1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to management and storage of surface |
3 | waters; amending s. 373.4135, F.S.; revising legislative |
4 | intent relating to certain rules of the Department of |
5 | Environmental Protection and water management districts |
6 | relating to mitigation banks and offsite regional |
7 | mitigation; amending s. 373.414, F.S.; revising criteria |
8 | for issuing permits for projects affecting surface waters |
9 | and wetlands; requiring the department to provide training |
10 | and guidance for applying the uniform mitigation |
11 | assessment method; requiring the department to provide a |
12 | formal determination process by rule to assess property |
13 | for the establishment of proposed mitigation banks; |
14 | providing procedures and requirements; authorizing water |
15 | management districts to take action on petitions for such |
16 | determinations; providing a fee; providing for revocation; |
17 | providing for final agency action and application of ch. |
18 | 120, F.S.; providing for application of specified permit |
19 | processing requirements; authorizing formal determinations |
20 | to be petitioned in conjunction with other determinations; |
21 | providing an effective date. |
22 |
|
23 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
24 |
|
25 | Section 1. Paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of section |
26 | 373.4135, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
27 | 373.4135 Mitigation banks and offsite regional |
28 | mitigation.- |
29 | (1) The Legislature finds that the adverse impacts of |
30 | activities regulated under this part may be offset by the |
31 | creation, maintenance, and use of mitigation banks and offsite |
32 | regional mitigation. Mitigation banks and offsite regional |
33 | mitigation can enhance the certainty of mitigation and provide |
34 | ecological value due to the improved likelihood of environmental |
35 | success associated with their proper construction, maintenance, |
36 | and management. Therefore, the department and the water |
37 | management districts are directed to participate in and |
38 | encourage the establishment of private and public mitigation |
39 | banks and offsite regional mitigation. Mitigation banks and |
40 | offsite regional mitigation should emphasize the restoration and |
41 | enhancement of degraded ecosystems and the preservation of |
42 | uplands and wetlands as intact ecosystems rather than alteration |
43 | of landscapes to create wetlands. This is best accomplished |
44 | through restoration of ecological communities that were |
45 | historically present. |
46 | (b) It is the further intent of the Legislature that |
47 | mitigation banks and offsite regional mitigation be considered |
48 | appropriate and a permittable mitigation option under the |
49 | conditions specified by the rules of the department and water |
50 | management districts and that such rules shall include a |
51 | preference for the use of mitigation banks consistent with the |
52 | provisions of 33 C.F.R. s. 332.3(b)(2). |
53 | Section 2. Subsection (18) of section 373.414, Florida |
54 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
55 | 373.414 Additional criteria for activities in surface |
56 | waters and wetlands.- |
57 | (18) The department and each water management district |
58 | responsible for implementation of the environmental resource |
59 | permitting program shall develop a uniform mitigation assessment |
60 | method for wetlands and other surface waters. The department |
61 | shall adopt the uniform mitigation assessment method by rule no |
62 | later than July 31, 2002. The rule shall provide an exclusive |
63 | and consistent process for determining the amount of mitigation |
64 | required to offset impacts to wetlands and other surface waters, |
65 | and, once effective, shall supersede all rules, ordinances, and |
66 | variance procedures from ordinances that determine the amount of |
67 | mitigation needed to offset such impacts. Once the department |
68 | adopts the uniform mitigation assessment method by rule, the |
69 | uniform mitigation assessment method shall be binding on the |
70 | department, the water management districts, local governments, |
71 | and any other governmental agencies and shall be the sole means |
72 | to determine the amount of mitigation needed to offset adverse |
73 | impacts to wetlands and other surface waters and to award and |
74 | deduct mitigation bank credits. A water management district and |
75 | any other governmental agency subject to chapter 120 may apply |
76 | the uniform mitigation assessment method without the need to |
77 | adopt it pursuant to s. 120.54. It shall be a goal of the |
78 | department and water management districts that the uniform |
79 | mitigation assessment method developed be practicable for use |
80 | within the timeframes provided in the permitting process and |
81 | result in a consistent process for determining mitigation |
82 | requirements. It shall be recognized that any such method shall |
83 | require the application of reasonable scientific judgment. The |
84 | uniform mitigation assessment method must determine the value of |
85 | functions provided by wetlands and other surface waters |
86 | considering the current conditions of these areas, utilization |
87 | by fish and wildlife, location, uniqueness, and hydrologic |
88 | connection, and, when applied to mitigation banks, the factors |
89 | listed in s. 373.4136(4). The uniform mitigation assessment |
90 | method shall also account for the expected time-lag associated |
91 | with offsetting impacts and the degree of risk associated with |
92 | the proposed mitigation. The uniform mitigation assessment |
93 | method shall account for different ecological communities in |
94 | different areas of the state. In developing the uniform |
95 | mitigation assessment method, the department and water |
96 | management districts shall consult with approved local programs |
97 | under s. 403.182 which have an established mitigation program |
98 | for wetlands or other surface waters. The department and water |
99 | management districts shall consider the recommendations |
100 | submitted by such approved local programs, including any |
101 | recommendations relating to the adoption by the department and |
102 | water management districts of any uniform mitigation methodology |
103 | that has been adopted and used by an approved local program in |
104 | its established mitigation program for wetlands or other surface |
105 | waters. Environmental resource permitting rules may establish |
106 | categories of permits or thresholds for minor impacts under |
107 | which the use of the uniform mitigation assessment method will |
108 | not be required. The application of the uniform mitigation |
109 | assessment method is not subject to s. 70.001. In the event the |
110 | rule establishing the uniform mitigation assessment method is |
111 | deemed to be invalid, the applicable rules related to |
112 | establishing needed mitigation in existence prior to the |
113 | adoption of the uniform mitigation assessment method, including |
114 | those adopted by a county which is an approved local program |
115 | under s. 403.182, and the method described in paragraph (b) for |
116 | existing mitigation banks, shall be authorized for use by the |
117 | department, water management districts, local governments, and |
118 | other state agencies. The department shall provide training and |
119 | guidance for the application of the uniform mitigation |
120 | assessment method and shall be available to address questions |
121 | regarding such application. |
122 | (a) In developing the uniform mitigation assessment |
123 | method, the department shall seek input from the United States |
124 | Army Corps of Engineers in order to promote consistency in the |
125 | mitigation assessment methods used by the state and federal |
126 | permitting programs. |
127 | (b) An entity which has received a mitigation bank permit |
128 | prior to the adoption of the uniform mitigation assessment |
129 | method shall have impact sites assessed, for the purpose of |
130 | deducting bank credits, using the credit assessment method, |
131 | including any functional assessment methodology, which was in |
132 | place when the bank was permitted; unless the entity elects to |
133 | have its credits redetermined, and thereafter have its credits |
134 | deducted, using the uniform mitigation assessment method. |
135 | (c) The department shall provide a formal determination |
136 | process by rule to assess a parcel of land pursuant to the |
137 | uniform mitigation assessment method for potential establishment |
138 | of a mitigation bank. The rule shall specify the information |
139 | that must be provided and may require authorization to enter |
140 | upon the property. The rule shall also establish procedures for |
141 | applying for, processing, and issuing a formal determination. |
142 | Once the department has adopted the rule, a water management |
143 | district may receive and take final agency action on petitions |
144 | for such determinations without the need to adopt the rule |
145 | pursuant to s. 120.54. By interagency agreement, the department |
146 | and each water management district shall determine which agency |
147 | shall implement the determination process within the district. |
148 | Upon adoption of the rule, any person with the written consent |
149 | of the property owner, an entity that has the power of eminent |
150 | domain, or any other person who has legal or equitable interest |
151 | in the property may petition the district for a formal |
152 | determination. If a petitioner does not provide information |
153 | regarding potential impacts or mitigation activities for the |
154 | property, the water management district or the department shall |
155 | only assess the current condition of the property or the |
156 | condition of the property without the proposed mitigation. A |
157 | water management district may authorize its executive director |
158 | to issue formal determinations. The water management district or |
159 | the department may establish by rule a fee to cover the costs of |
160 | processing and acting upon the petition. A water management |
161 | district or the department may publish, or require the |
162 | petitioner to publish at the petitioner's expense, notice of the |
163 | intended agency action on a petition for a formal determination |
164 | in a newspaper of general circulation within the affected area. |
165 | 1. A formal determination for an assessment of the current |
166 | condition of a property or the condition of the property without |
167 | the proposed mitigation is binding for a period not to exceed 5 |
168 | years as long as physical conditions on the property do not |
169 | change, other than changes that have been authorized by a permit |
170 | pursuant to this part, so as to alter the ecological conditions |
171 | of the uplands, wetlands, or other surface waters assessed |
172 | pursuant to this paragraph. A formal determination for an |
173 | assessment of the condition of a property with the proposed |
174 | mitigation is binding for a period not to exceed 5 years as long |
175 | as the mitigation has not changed. |
176 | 2. Within 60 days prior to the expiration of a formal |
177 | determination, the holder of the determination, with the written |
178 | consent of the property owner, an entity that has the power of |
179 | eminent domain, or any other person who has legal or equitable |
180 | interest in the property, may petition for a new formal |
181 | determination for the same parcel of property. Such |
182 | determination approving the same uniform mitigation assessment |
183 | in the previous formal determination shall be issued as long as |
184 | physical conditions on the property have not changed, other than |
185 | changes that have been authorized by a permit pursuant to this |
186 | part, so as to alter the ecological conditions of the uplands, |
187 | wetlands, or other surface waters and the uniform mitigation |
188 | assessment methodology authorized by this subsection has not |
189 | been amended since the previous formal determination or the |
190 | proposed impacts or mitigation for the assessed property have |
191 | not changed. The holder of a determination may also apply to |
192 | modify the determination to reflect changed physical conditions |
193 | on the property or new or modified proposed impacts or |
194 | mitigation. The application fee for such a subsequent petition |
195 | shall be less than the application fee for the original |
196 | determination. |
197 | 3. A water management district or the department may |
198 | revoke a formal determination if it finds that the petitioner |
199 | has submitted inaccurate information. |
200 | 4. A formal determination obtained under this paragraph is |
201 | final agency action and is in lieu of a declaratory statement of |
202 | jurisdiction obtainable under s. 120.565. Sections 120.569, |
203 | 120.57, and 373.4141 apply to formal determinations under this |
204 | paragraph. |
205 | 5. A formal determination of the extent of surface waters |
206 | and wetlands pursuant to s. 373.421 may be petitioned in |
207 | conjunction with a formal determination under this paragraph. |
208 | Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2010. |