| 1 | A bill to be entitled |
| 2 | An act relating to management and storage of surface |
| 3 | waters; amending s. 373.4135, F.S.; revising legislative |
| 4 | intent relating to certain rules of the Department of |
| 5 | Environmental Protection and water management districts |
| 6 | relating to mitigation banks and offsite regional |
| 7 | mitigation; amending s. 373.414, F.S.; revising criteria |
| 8 | for issuing permits for projects affecting surface waters |
| 9 | and wetlands; requiring the department to provide training |
| 10 | and guidance for applying the uniform mitigation |
| 11 | assessment method; requiring the department to provide a |
| 12 | formal determination process by rule to assess property |
| 13 | for the establishment of proposed mitigation banks; |
| 14 | providing procedures and requirements; authorizing water |
| 15 | management districts to take action on petitions for such |
| 16 | determinations; providing a fee; providing for revocation; |
| 17 | providing for final agency action and application of ch. |
| 18 | 120, F.S.; providing for application of specified permit |
| 19 | processing requirements; authorizing formal determinations |
| 20 | to be petitioned in conjunction with other determinations; |
| 21 | providing an effective date. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 | Section 1. Paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of section |
| 26 | 373.4135, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
| 27 | 373.4135 Mitigation banks and offsite regional |
| 28 | mitigation.- |
| 29 | (1) The Legislature finds that the adverse impacts of |
| 30 | activities regulated under this part may be offset by the |
| 31 | creation, maintenance, and use of mitigation banks and offsite |
| 32 | regional mitigation. Mitigation banks and offsite regional |
| 33 | mitigation can enhance the certainty of mitigation and provide |
| 34 | ecological value due to the improved likelihood of environmental |
| 35 | success associated with their proper construction, maintenance, |
| 36 | and management. Therefore, the department and the water |
| 37 | management districts are directed to participate in and |
| 38 | encourage the establishment of private and public mitigation |
| 39 | banks and offsite regional mitigation. Mitigation banks and |
| 40 | offsite regional mitigation should emphasize the restoration and |
| 41 | enhancement of degraded ecosystems and the preservation of |
| 42 | uplands and wetlands as intact ecosystems rather than alteration |
| 43 | of landscapes to create wetlands. This is best accomplished |
| 44 | through restoration of ecological communities that were |
| 45 | historically present. |
| 46 | (b) It is the further intent of the Legislature that |
| 47 | mitigation banks and offsite regional mitigation be considered |
| 48 | appropriate and a permittable mitigation option under the |
| 49 | conditions specified by the rules of the department and water |
| 50 | management districts and that such rules shall include a |
| 51 | preference for the use of mitigation banks consistent with the |
| 52 | provisions of 33 C.F.R. s. 332.3(b)(2). |
| 53 | Section 2. Subsection (18) of section 373.414, Florida |
| 54 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
| 55 | 373.414 Additional criteria for activities in surface |
| 56 | waters and wetlands.- |
| 57 | (18) The department and each water management district |
| 58 | responsible for implementation of the environmental resource |
| 59 | permitting program shall develop a uniform mitigation assessment |
| 60 | method for wetlands and other surface waters. The department |
| 61 | shall adopt the uniform mitigation assessment method by rule no |
| 62 | later than July 31, 2002. The rule shall provide an exclusive |
| 63 | and consistent process for determining the amount of mitigation |
| 64 | required to offset impacts to wetlands and other surface waters, |
| 65 | and, once effective, shall supersede all rules, ordinances, and |
| 66 | variance procedures from ordinances that determine the amount of |
| 67 | mitigation needed to offset such impacts. Once the department |
| 68 | adopts the uniform mitigation assessment method by rule, the |
| 69 | uniform mitigation assessment method shall be binding on the |
| 70 | department, the water management districts, local governments, |
| 71 | and any other governmental agencies and shall be the sole means |
| 72 | to determine the amount of mitigation needed to offset adverse |
| 73 | impacts to wetlands and other surface waters and to award and |
| 74 | deduct mitigation bank credits. A water management district and |
| 75 | any other governmental agency subject to chapter 120 may apply |
| 76 | the uniform mitigation assessment method without the need to |
| 77 | adopt it pursuant to s. 120.54. It shall be a goal of the |
| 78 | department and water management districts that the uniform |
| 79 | mitigation assessment method developed be practicable for use |
| 80 | within the timeframes provided in the permitting process and |
| 81 | result in a consistent process for determining mitigation |
| 82 | requirements. It shall be recognized that any such method shall |
| 83 | require the application of reasonable scientific judgment. The |
| 84 | uniform mitigation assessment method must determine the value of |
| 85 | functions provided by wetlands and other surface waters |
| 86 | considering the current conditions of these areas, utilization |
| 87 | by fish and wildlife, location, uniqueness, and hydrologic |
| 88 | connection, and, when applied to mitigation banks, the factors |
| 89 | listed in s. 373.4136(4). The uniform mitigation assessment |
| 90 | method shall also account for the expected time-lag associated |
| 91 | with offsetting impacts and the degree of risk associated with |
| 92 | the proposed mitigation. The uniform mitigation assessment |
| 93 | method shall account for different ecological communities in |
| 94 | different areas of the state. In developing the uniform |
| 95 | mitigation assessment method, the department and water |
| 96 | management districts shall consult with approved local programs |
| 97 | under s. 403.182 which have an established mitigation program |
| 98 | for wetlands or other surface waters. The department and water |
| 99 | management districts shall consider the recommendations |
| 100 | submitted by such approved local programs, including any |
| 101 | recommendations relating to the adoption by the department and |
| 102 | water management districts of any uniform mitigation methodology |
| 103 | that has been adopted and used by an approved local program in |
| 104 | its established mitigation program for wetlands or other surface |
| 105 | waters. Environmental resource permitting rules may establish |
| 106 | categories of permits or thresholds for minor impacts under |
| 107 | which the use of the uniform mitigation assessment method will |
| 108 | not be required. The application of the uniform mitigation |
| 109 | assessment method is not subject to s. 70.001. In the event the |
| 110 | rule establishing the uniform mitigation assessment method is |
| 111 | deemed to be invalid, the applicable rules related to |
| 112 | establishing needed mitigation in existence prior to the |
| 113 | adoption of the uniform mitigation assessment method, including |
| 114 | those adopted by a county which is an approved local program |
| 115 | under s. 403.182, and the method described in paragraph (b) for |
| 116 | existing mitigation banks, shall be authorized for use by the |
| 117 | department, water management districts, local governments, and |
| 118 | other state agencies. The department shall provide training and |
| 119 | guidance for the application of the uniform mitigation |
| 120 | assessment method and shall be available to address questions |
| 121 | regarding such application. |
| 122 | (a) In developing the uniform mitigation assessment |
| 123 | method, the department shall seek input from the United States |
| 124 | Army Corps of Engineers in order to promote consistency in the |
| 125 | mitigation assessment methods used by the state and federal |
| 126 | permitting programs. |
| 127 | (b) An entity which has received a mitigation bank permit |
| 128 | prior to the adoption of the uniform mitigation assessment |
| 129 | method shall have impact sites assessed, for the purpose of |
| 130 | deducting bank credits, using the credit assessment method, |
| 131 | including any functional assessment methodology, which was in |
| 132 | place when the bank was permitted; unless the entity elects to |
| 133 | have its credits redetermined, and thereafter have its credits |
| 134 | deducted, using the uniform mitigation assessment method. |
| 135 | (c) The department shall provide a formal determination |
| 136 | process by rule to assess a parcel of land pursuant to the |
| 137 | uniform mitigation assessment method for potential establishment |
| 138 | of a mitigation bank. The rule shall specify the information |
| 139 | that must be provided and may require authorization to enter |
| 140 | upon the property. The rule shall also establish procedures for |
| 141 | applying for, processing, and issuing a formal determination. |
| 142 | Once the department has adopted the rule, a water management |
| 143 | district may receive and take final agency action on petitions |
| 144 | for such determinations without the need to adopt the rule |
| 145 | pursuant to s. 120.54. By interagency agreement, the department |
| 146 | and each water management district shall determine which agency |
| 147 | shall implement the determination process within the district. |
| 148 | Upon adoption of the rule, any person with the written consent |
| 149 | of the property owner, an entity that has the power of eminent |
| 150 | domain, or any other person who has legal or equitable interest |
| 151 | in the property may petition the district for a formal |
| 152 | determination. If a petitioner does not provide information |
| 153 | regarding potential impacts or mitigation activities for the |
| 154 | property, the water management district or the department shall |
| 155 | only assess the current condition of the property or the |
| 156 | condition of the property without the proposed mitigation. A |
| 157 | water management district may authorize its executive director |
| 158 | to issue formal determinations. The water management district or |
| 159 | the department may establish by rule a fee to cover the costs of |
| 160 | processing and acting upon the petition. A water management |
| 161 | district or the department may publish, or require the |
| 162 | petitioner to publish at the petitioner's expense, notice of the |
| 163 | intended agency action on a petition for a formal determination |
| 164 | in a newspaper of general circulation within the affected area. |
| 165 | 1. A formal determination for an assessment of the current |
| 166 | condition of a property or the condition of the property without |
| 167 | the proposed mitigation is binding for a period not to exceed 5 |
| 168 | years as long as physical conditions on the property do not |
| 169 | change, other than changes that have been authorized by a permit |
| 170 | pursuant to this part, so as to alter the ecological conditions |
| 171 | of the uplands, wetlands, or other surface waters assessed |
| 172 | pursuant to this paragraph. A formal determination for an |
| 173 | assessment of the condition of a property with the proposed |
| 174 | mitigation is binding for a period not to exceed 5 years as long |
| 175 | as the mitigation has not changed. |
| 176 | 2. Within 60 days prior to the expiration of a formal |
| 177 | determination, the holder of the determination, with the written |
| 178 | consent of the property owner, an entity that has the power of |
| 179 | eminent domain, or any other person who has legal or equitable |
| 180 | interest in the property, may petition for a new formal |
| 181 | determination for the same parcel of property. Such |
| 182 | determination approving the same uniform mitigation assessment |
| 183 | in the previous formal determination shall be issued as long as |
| 184 | physical conditions on the property have not changed, other than |
| 185 | changes that have been authorized by a permit pursuant to this |
| 186 | part, so as to alter the ecological conditions of the uplands, |
| 187 | wetlands, or other surface waters and the uniform mitigation |
| 188 | assessment methodology authorized by this subsection has not |
| 189 | been amended since the previous formal determination or the |
| 190 | proposed impacts or mitigation for the assessed property have |
| 191 | not changed. The holder of a determination may also apply to |
| 192 | modify the determination to reflect changed physical conditions |
| 193 | on the property or new or modified proposed impacts or |
| 194 | mitigation. The application fee for such a subsequent petition |
| 195 | shall be less than the application fee for the original |
| 196 | determination. |
| 197 | 3. A water management district or the department may |
| 198 | revoke a formal determination if it finds that the petitioner |
| 199 | has submitted inaccurate information. |
| 200 | 4. A formal determination obtained under this paragraph is |
| 201 | final agency action and is in lieu of a declaratory statement of |
| 202 | jurisdiction obtainable under s. 120.565. Sections 120.569, |
| 203 | 120.57, and 373.4141 apply to formal determinations under this |
| 204 | paragraph. |
| 205 | 5. A formal determination of the extent of surface waters |
| 206 | and wetlands pursuant to s. 373.421 may be petitioned in |
| 207 | conjunction with a formal determination under this paragraph. |
| 208 | Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2010. |