| 1 | A bill to be entitled |
| 2 | An act for the relief of Lois H. Lacava by the Munroe |
| 3 | Regional Health System, Inc.; providing for an |
| 4 | appropriation to compensate her for injuries sustained as |
| 5 | a result of the negligence of the Munroe Regional Medical |
| 6 | Center; providing a limitation on the payment of fees and |
| 7 | costs; providing an effective date. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 | WHEREAS, on November 8, 2005, Lois H. Lacava was admitted |
| 10 | to the Munroe Regional Medical Center in Ocala, Florida, with an |
| 11 | admitted diagnosis of a malunion of the right hip which was |
| 12 | related to a prior fracture of the neck of the femur bone in her |
| 13 | leg, and |
| 14 | WHEREAS, on November 11, 2005, Ms. Lacava had a total right |
| 15 | hip arthroplasty along with hardware removal, and the following |
| 16 | day Dr. Mehra examined Ms. Lacava and noticed that her right leg |
| 17 | below the knee to her toes was cold to the touch and that her |
| 18 | toes were discolored, and |
| 19 | WHEREAS, Dr. Mehra brought these observations to the |
| 20 | attention of registered nurse Stacey Graham, ordered an arterial |
| 21 | Doppler test to be performed immediately, and advised the nurse |
| 22 | to continue to daily monitor Ms. Lacava's production of red |
| 23 | blood cells and the effectiveness of a blood-thinning drug that |
| 24 | Ms. Lacava was prescribed, and |
| 25 | WHEREAS, an arterial Doppler test is a blood pressure test |
| 26 | that measures the lack of blood flow which may be caused by a |
| 27 | blockage in the arteries in the legs, and |
| 28 | WHEREAS, Dr. Mehra was not on call on the evening of |
| 29 | November 12, but the next morning he was paged by the nurse |
| 30 | taking care of Ms. Lacava and told that her venous Doppler test, |
| 31 | a test used to check the circulation in the large veins in the |
| 32 | legs, was negative for deep venous thrombosis, and |
| 33 | WHEREAS, upon further questioning, Dr. Mehra realized that |
| 34 | the arterial Doppler test had not been performed even though he |
| 35 | had ordered nurse Graham to conduct the test, and |
| 36 | WHEREAS, nurse Graham explained that she had spoken to the |
| 37 | Doppler technician who, upon hearing the clinical features and |
| 38 | history of the patient, had been reluctant to perform an |
| 39 | arterial Doppler test because the technician thought there was a |
| 40 | venous problem in Ms. Lacava's leg, and |
| 41 | WHEREAS, a computer loading error required a venous Doppler |
| 42 | test to be performed before an arterial Doppler test and, for |
| 43 | unexplained reasons, the arterial Doppler test was never |
| 44 | performed, and |
| 45 | WHEREAS, even though the venous Doppler test did not reveal |
| 46 | any deep venous thrombosis, the lack of the arterial Doppler |
| 47 | test prevented a femoral artery occlusion from being timely |
| 48 | diagnosed, and |
| 49 | WHEREAS, Dr. Mehra ordered an evaluation for vascular |
| 50 | surgery by Dr. Swaminathan and another arterial Doppler test to |
| 51 | be performed immediately, and |
| 52 | WHEREAS, Dr. Swaminathan evaluated Ms. Lacava and ordered |
| 53 | an angiogram, which revealed a blockage of the right femoral |
| 54 | artery and dislocation of the right hip prosthesis, and Ms. |
| 55 | Lacava was taken to the emergency operating room where Dr. Brill |
| 56 | performed a right total hip arthroplasty revision and Dr. |
| 57 | Swaminathan performed an excision of a blood clot of the right |
| 58 | femoral vein, with repair to the right femoral artery, and |
| 59 | WHEREAS, Dr. Swaminathan also removed a blockage in the |
| 60 | right tibial artery and cut the soft tissue component of the |
| 61 | connective tissue in order to relieve tension or pressure within |
| 62 | the right leg; however, Ms. Lacava ultimately experienced |
| 63 | irreversible necrosis of her right lower leg, which required |
| 64 | that her leg be amputated above the knee, and |
| 65 | WHEREAS, after her surgeries Ms. Lacava developed |
| 66 | tachycardia secondary to toxemia from the gangrene of her right |
| 67 | foot and lower leg, suffered a fracture of her superior pubic |
| 68 | ramus and femoral prosthesis, acquired a staphylococcus |
| 69 | infection, and developed diarrhea, and |
| 70 | WHEREAS, it was determined that Ms. Lacava was not a |
| 71 | suitable candidate for a prosthesis due to her medical |
| 72 | conditions that included an above-the-knee amputation of her |
| 73 | right leg and a dislocated prosthetic hip, and |
| 74 | WHEREAS, a consent final judgment was entered in favor of |
| 75 | Ms. Lacava against the Munroe Regional Health System, Inc., by |
| 76 | the Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial Circuit in and for |
| 77 | Marion County for $450,000, wherein $200,000 was paid to Ms. |
| 78 | Lacava within 30 days after entry of the consent final judgment, |
| 79 | and the remaining balance of $250,000, pursuant to the agreement |
| 80 | by the parties, would be reported to the Florida Legislature for |
| 81 | its consideration as a claim bill, NOW, THEREFORE, |
| 82 |
|
| 83 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 84 |
|
| 85 | Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act |
| 86 | are found and declared to be true. |
| 87 | Section 2. Munroe Regional Health System, Inc., is |
| 88 | authorized and directed to appropriate from funds not otherwise |
| 89 | appropriated and to draw a warrant in the sum of $250,000, |
| 90 | payable to Lois H. Lacava, as compensation for injuries and |
| 91 | damages sustained as a result of the negligence of Munroe |
| 92 | Regional Medical Center. |
| 93 | Section 3. The amount paid by Munroe Regional Health |
| 94 | System, Inc., pursuant to s. 768.28, Florida Statutes, and the |
| 95 | amount awarded under this act are intended to provide the sole |
| 96 | compensation for all present and future claims arising out of |
| 97 | the factual situation described in this act which resulted in |
| 98 | injury to Lois H. Lacava. The total amount paid for attorney's |
| 99 | fees, lobbying fees, costs, and other similar expenses relating |
| 100 | to this claim may not exceed 25 percent of the total amount |
| 101 | awarded under this act. |
| 102 | Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |