| 1 | A bill to be entitled | 
| 2 | An act relating to petroleum contamination site cleanup; | 
| 3 | amending s. 376.3071, F.S.; revising provisions relating | 
| 4 | to petroleum contamination site selection and cleanup | 
| 5 | criteria; deleting obsolete provisions relating to funding | 
| 6 | for limited interim soil-source removals; requiring the | 
| 7 | Department of Environmental Protection to utilize natural | 
| 8 | attenuation monitoring strategies to transition sites into | 
| 9 | long-term natural attenuation monitoring under specified | 
| 10 | conditions; providing for natural attenuation and active | 
| 11 | remediation of sites; requiring the department to evaluate | 
| 12 | certain costs and strategies; prohibiting local | 
| 13 | governments from denying development orders and permits on | 
| 14 | the grounds that a property is contaminated; providing an | 
| 15 | exception; establishing a low-scored site initiative; | 
| 16 | providing conditions for participation; requiring the | 
| 17 | department to issue certain determinations and orders; | 
| 18 | providing that certain sites are eligible for payment of | 
| 19 | preapproved costs; requiring assessment work to be | 
| 20 | completed within a certain timeframe; providing payment | 
| 21 | and funding limitations; deleting provisions relating to | 
| 22 | nonreimbursable voluntary cleanup; providing an effective | 
| 23 | date. | 
| 24 | 
 | 
| 25 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: | 
| 26 | 
 | 
| 27 | Section 1.  Paragraph (c) of subsection (5) and paragraph | 
| 28 | (b) of subsection (11) of section 376.3071, Florida Statutes, | 
| 29 | are amended to read: | 
| 30 | 376.3071  Inland Protection Trust Fund; creation; purposes; | 
| 31 | funding.- | 
| 32 | (5)  SITE SELECTION AND CLEANUP CRITERIA.- | 
| 33 | (c)  The department shall require source removal, if | 
| 34 | warranted and cost-effective, at each site eligible for | 
| 35 | restoration funding from the Inland Protection Trust Fund. | 
| 36 | 1.  Funding for free product recovery may be provided in | 
| 37 | advance of the order established by the priority ranking system | 
| 38 | under paragraph (a) for site cleanup activities. However, a | 
| 39 | separate prioritization for free product recovery shall be | 
| 40 | established consistent with paragraph (a). No more than $5 | 
| 41 | million shall be encumbered from the Inland Protection Trust | 
| 42 | Fund in any fiscal year for free product recovery conducted in | 
| 43 | advance of the priority order under paragraph (a) established | 
| 44 | for site cleanup activities. | 
| 45 | 2.  Funding for limited interim soil-source removals for  | 
| 46 | sites that will become inaccessible for future remediation due  | 
| 47 | to road infrastructure and right-of-way restrictions resulting  | 
| 48 | from a pending Department of Transportation road construction  | 
| 49 | project or for secondary containment upgrading of underground  | 
| 50 | storage tanks required under chapter 62-761, Florida  | 
| 51 | Administrative Code, may be provided in advance of the order  | 
| 52 | established by the priority ranking system under paragraph (a)  | 
| 53 | for site cleanup activities. The department shall provide  | 
| 54 | written guidance on the limited source removal information and  | 
| 55 | technical evaluation necessary to justify a request for a  | 
| 56 | limited source removal in advance of the priority order pursuant  | 
| 57 | to paragraph (a) established for site cleanup activities.  | 
| 58 | Prioritization for limited source removal projects associated  | 
| 59 | with a secondary containment upgrade in any fiscal year shall be  | 
| 60 | determined on a first-come, first-served basis according to the  | 
| 61 | approval date issued under s. 376.30711 for the limited source  | 
| 62 | removal. Funding for limited source removals associated with  | 
| 63 | secondary containment upgrades shall be limited to 10 sites in  | 
| 64 | each fiscal year for each facility owner and any related person.  | 
| 65 | The limited source removal for secondary containment upgrades  | 
| 66 | shall be completed no later than 6 months after the department  | 
| 67 | issues its approval of the project, and the approval  | 
| 68 | automatically expires at the end of the 6 months. Funding for  | 
| 69 | Department of Transportation and secondary containment upgrade  | 
| 70 | source removals may not exceed $50,000 for a single facility  | 
| 71 | unless the department makes a determination that it is cost- | 
| 72 | effective and environmentally beneficial to exceed this amount,  | 
| 73 | but in no event shall the department authorize costs in excess  | 
| 74 | of $100,000 for a single facility. Department funding for  | 
| 75 | limited interim soil-source removals associated with Department  | 
| 76 | of Transportation projects and secondary containment upgrades  | 
| 77 | shall be limited to supplemental soil assessment, soil  | 
| 78 | screening, soil removal, backfill material, treatment or  | 
| 79 | disposal of the contaminated soil, dewatering related to the  | 
| 80 | contaminated soil removal in an amount of up to 10 percent of  | 
| 81 | the total interim soil-source removal project costs, treatment,  | 
| 82 | and disposal of the contaminated groundwater and preparation of  | 
| 83 | the source removal report. No other costs associated with the  | 
| 84 | facility upgrade may be paid with department funds. No more than  | 
| 85 | $1 million for Department of Transportation limited source  | 
| 86 | removal projects and $10 million for secondary containment  | 
| 87 | upgrade limited source removal projects conducted in advance of  | 
| 88 | the priority order established under paragraph (a) for site  | 
| 89 | cleanup activities shall be encumbered from the Inland  | 
| 90 | Protection Trust Fund in any fiscal year. This subparagraph is  | 
| 91 | repealed effective June 30, 2010. | 
| 92 | 2. 3.Once free product removal and other source removal | 
| 93 | identified in this paragraph are completed at a site, and | 
| 94 | notwithstanding the order established by the priority ranking | 
| 95 | system under paragraph (a) for site cleanup activities, the | 
| 96 | department may reevaluate the site to determine the degree of | 
| 97 | active cleanup needed to continue site rehabilitation. Further, | 
| 98 | the department shall determine if the reevaluated site qualifies | 
| 99 | for natural attenuation monitoring, long-term natural | 
| 100 | attenuation monitoring, or no further action. If additional site | 
| 101 | rehabilitation is necessary to reach no further action status, | 
| 102 | the site rehabilitation shall be conducted in the order | 
| 103 | established by the priority ranking system under paragraph (a). | 
| 104 | andThe department shallis encouraged toutilize natural | 
| 105 | attenuation andmonitoring strategies and, when cost-effective, | 
| 106 | transition sites eligible for restoration funding assistance to | 
| 107 | long-term natural attenuation monitoring where the plume is | 
| 108 | shrinking or stable and confined to the source property | 
| 109 | boundaries and the petroleum products' chemicals of concern meet | 
| 110 | the natural attenuation default concentrations, as defined by | 
| 111 | department rule. If the plume migrates beyond the source | 
| 112 | property boundaries, natural attenuation monitoring may be | 
| 113 | conducted in accordance with department rule, or if the site no | 
| 114 | longer qualifies for natural attenuation monitoring, active | 
| 115 | remediation may be resumed. If the petroleum products' chemicals | 
| 116 | of concern increase or are not significantly reduced after 42 | 
| 117 | months of monitoring, active remediation shall be resumed as | 
| 118 | necessary. For sites undergoing active remediation, the | 
| 119 | department shall evaluate the cost of natural attenuation | 
| 120 | monitoring pursuant to s. 376.30711 to ensure that site | 
| 121 | mobilizations are performed in a cost-effective manner. Sites | 
| 122 | that are not eligible for state restoration funding may | 
| 123 | transition to long-term natural attenuation monitoring using the | 
| 124 | criteria in this subparagraph. Nothing in this subparagraph | 
| 125 | precludes a site from pursuing a "No Further Action" order with | 
| 126 | conditions where site conditions warrant. | 
| 127 | 3.  The department shall evaluate whether higher natural | 
| 128 | attenuation default concentrations for natural attenuation | 
| 129 | monitoring or long-term natural attenuation monitoring are cost- | 
| 130 | effective and would adequately protect public health and the | 
| 131 | environment. The department shall also evaluate site-specific | 
| 132 | characteristics that would allow for higher natural attenuation | 
| 133 | or long-term natural attenuation concentration levels. | 
| 134 | 4.  Unless institutional controls have been imposed by the | 
| 135 | responsible party or property owner to restrict the uses of the | 
| 136 | site, a local government may not deny a development order or | 
| 137 | other permit on the grounds that petroleum contamination exists | 
| 138 | onsite. | 
| 139 | (11) | 
| 140 | (b)  Low-scored site initiative Nonreimbursable voluntary  | 
| 141 | cleanup.-Notwithstanding s. 376.30711, any siteFor sites with  | 
| 142 | releases reported prior to January 1, 1995, the department shall  | 
| 143 | issue a determination of "No Further Action" at sites ranked  | 
| 144 | with a totalpriority ranking score of 10 points or less may | 
| 145 | voluntarily participate in the low-scored site initiative, | 
| 146 | whether or not the site is eligible for state restoration | 
| 147 | funding. | 
| 148 | 1.  To participate in the low-scored site initiative, the | 
| 149 | responsible party or property owner must affirmatively | 
| 150 | demonstrate that , which meetthe following conditions are met: | 
| 151 | a. 1.Upon reassessment pursuant to department rule, the | 
| 152 | site retains a priority ranking score of 10 points or less No  | 
| 153 | free product exists in wells, boreholes, subsurface utility  | 
| 154 | conduits, or vaults or buildings and no other fire or explosion  | 
| 155 | hazard exists as a result of a release of petroleum products. | 
| 156 | b. 2.No excessively contaminated soil, as defined by | 
| 157 | department rule, exists onsite as a result of a release of | 
| 158 | petroleum products. | 
| 159 | c. 3.A minimum of 6 months of groundwater monitoring | 
| 160 | indicates that the plume is shrinking or stable Public supply  | 
| 161 | wells for consumptive use of water expected to be affected by  | 
| 162 | the site shall not be located within a 1/2-mile radius of the  | 
| 163 | site; private supply wells for consumptive use of water expected  | 
| 164 | to be affected by the site shall not be located within a 1/4- | 
| 165 | mile radius of the site; and there must be no current or  | 
| 166 | projected consumptive use of the water affected by the site for  | 
| 167 | at least the following 3 years. Where appropriate, institutional  | 
| 168 | controls meeting the requirements of subparagraph (5)(b)4. may  | 
| 169 | be required by the department to meet these criteria. | 
| 170 | d. 4.The release of petroleum products at the site does | 
| 171 | shallnot adversely affect adjacent surface waters, including | 
| 172 | their effects on human health and the environment. | 
| 173 | e. 5.The area of groundwater containing the petroleum | 
| 174 | products' chemicals of concern in concentrations greater than  | 
| 175 | the boundary values defined in subparagraph 7.is less than one- | 
| 176 | quarter acre and is confined to the source property boundaries | 
| 177 | of the real property on which the discharge originated. | 
| 178 | f. 6.Soils onsite that are subject to human exposure found | 
| 179 | between land surface and 2 feet below land surface shallmeet | 
| 180 | the soil cleanup target levels criteriaestablished by | 
| 181 | department rule or human exposure is limited by pursuant to sub- | 
| 182 | subparagraph (5)(b)9.a. Whereappropriate,institutional or | 
| 183 | engineering controls meeting the requirements of subparagraph  | 
| 184 | (5)(b)4. may be required by the department to meet these  | 
| 185 | criteria. | 
| 186 | 2.  Upon affirmative demonstration of the conditions under | 
| 187 | subparagraph 1., the department shall issue a determination of | 
| 188 | "No Further Action." Such determination acknowledges that | 
| 189 | minimal contamination exists onsite and that such contamination | 
| 190 | is not a threat to human health or the environment. If no | 
| 191 | contamination is detected, the department may issue a site | 
| 192 | rehabilitation completion order. | 
| 193 | 3.  Sites that are eligible for state restoration funding | 
| 194 | may receive payment of preapproved costs for the low-scored site | 
| 195 | initiative as follows: | 
| 196 | a.  A responsible party or property owner may submit an | 
| 197 | assessment plan designed to affirmatively demonstrate that the | 
| 198 | site meets the conditions under subparagraph 1. Notwithstanding | 
| 199 | the priority ranking score of the site, the department may | 
| 200 | preapprove the cost of the assessment pursuant to s. 376.30711, | 
| 201 | including 6 months of groundwater monitoring, not to exceed | 
| 202 | $30,000 for each site. The department may not pay the costs | 
| 203 | associated with the establishment of institutional or | 
| 204 | engineering controls. | 
| 205 | b.  The assessment work shall be completed no later than 6 | 
| 206 | months after the department issues its approval. | 
| 207 | c.  No more than $10 million for the low-scored site | 
| 208 | initiative shall be encumbered from the Inland Protection Trust | 
| 209 | Fund in any fiscal year. Funds shall be made available on a | 
| 210 | first-come, first-served basis and shall be limited to 10 sites | 
| 211 | in each fiscal year for each responsible party or property | 
| 212 | owner. | 
| 213 | 7.  Concentrations of the petroleum products' chemicals of  | 
| 214 | concern in groundwater at the property boundary of the real  | 
| 215 | property on which the petroleum contamination originates shall  | 
| 216 | not exceed the criteria established pursuant to sub-subparagraph  | 
| 217 | (5)(b)7.a. Where appropriate, institutional or engineering  | 
| 218 | controls meeting the requirements of subparagraph (5)(b)4. may  | 
| 219 | be required by the department to meet these criteria. | 
| 220 | 8.  The department is authorized to establish alternate  | 
| 221 | cleanup target levels for onsite nonboundary wells pursuant to  | 
| 222 | the criteria in subparagraph (5)(b)8. | 
| 223 | 9.  A scientific evaluation that demonstrates that the  | 
| 224 | boundary criteria in subparagraph 7. will not be exceeded and a  | 
| 225 | 1-year site-specific groundwater monitoring plan approved in  | 
| 226 | advance by the department validates the scientific evaluation.  | 
| 227 | If the boundary criteria in subparagraph 7. are exceeded at any  | 
| 228 | time, the department may order an extension of the monitoring  | 
| 229 | period for up to 12 additional months from the time of the  | 
| 230 | excess reading. The department shall determine the adequacy of  | 
| 231 | the groundwater monitoring system at a site. All wells required  | 
| 232 | by the department pursuant to this paragraph shall be installed  | 
| 233 | before the monitoring period begins. | 
| 234 | 10.  Costs associated with activities performed pursuant to  | 
| 235 | this paragraph for sites which qualify for a determination of  | 
| 236 | "No Further Action" under this paragraph shall not be  | 
| 237 | reimbursable from the Inland Protection Trust Fund. | 
| 238 | Section 2.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2010. |