1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to petroleum contamination site cleanup; |
3 | amending s. 376.3071, F.S.; revising provisions relating |
4 | to petroleum contamination site selection and cleanup |
5 | criteria; deleting obsolete provisions relating to funding |
6 | for limited interim soil-source removals; requiring the |
7 | Department of Environmental Protection to utilize natural |
8 | attenuation monitoring strategies to transition sites into |
9 | long-term natural attenuation monitoring under specified |
10 | conditions; providing for natural attenuation and active |
11 | remediation of sites; requiring the department to evaluate |
12 | certain costs and strategies; prohibiting local |
13 | governments from denying building permits under specified |
14 | conditions; providing requirements for such permits and |
15 | related construction, repairs, and renovations; |
16 | establishing a low-scored site initiative; providing |
17 | conditions for participation; requiring the department to |
18 | issue certain determinations and orders; providing that |
19 | certain sites are eligible for payment of preapproved |
20 | costs; requiring assessment work to be completed within a |
21 | certain timeframe; providing payment and funding |
22 | limitations; deleting provisions relating to |
23 | nonreimbursable voluntary cleanup; providing an effective |
24 | date. |
25 |
|
26 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
27 |
|
28 | Section 1. Paragraph (c) of subsection (5) and paragraph |
29 | (b) of subsection (11) of section 376.3071, Florida Statutes, |
30 | are amended to read: |
31 | 376.3071 Inland Protection Trust Fund; creation; purposes; |
32 | funding.- |
33 | (5) SITE SELECTION AND CLEANUP CRITERIA.- |
34 | (c) The department shall require source removal, if |
35 | warranted and cost-effective, at each site eligible for |
36 | restoration funding from the Inland Protection Trust Fund. |
37 | 1. Funding for free product recovery may be provided in |
38 | advance of the order established by the priority ranking system |
39 | under paragraph (a) for site cleanup activities. However, a |
40 | separate prioritization for free product recovery shall be |
41 | established consistent with paragraph (a). No more than $5 |
42 | million shall be encumbered from the Inland Protection Trust |
43 | Fund in any fiscal year for free product recovery conducted in |
44 | advance of the priority order under paragraph (a) established |
45 | for site cleanup activities. |
46 | 2. Funding for limited interim soil-source removals for |
47 | sites that will become inaccessible for future remediation due |
48 | to road infrastructure and right-of-way restrictions resulting |
49 | from a pending Department of Transportation road construction |
50 | project or for secondary containment upgrading of underground |
51 | storage tanks required under chapter 62-761, Florida |
52 | Administrative Code, may be provided in advance of the order |
53 | established by the priority ranking system under paragraph (a) |
54 | for site cleanup activities. The department shall provide |
55 | written guidance on the limited source removal information and |
56 | technical evaluation necessary to justify a request for a |
57 | limited source removal in advance of the priority order pursuant |
58 | to paragraph (a) established for site cleanup activities. |
59 | Prioritization for limited source removal projects associated |
60 | with a secondary containment upgrade in any fiscal year shall be |
61 | determined on a first-come, first-served basis according to the |
62 | approval date issued under s. 376.30711 for the limited source |
63 | removal. Funding for limited source removals associated with |
64 | secondary containment upgrades shall be limited to 10 sites in |
65 | each fiscal year for each facility owner and any related person. |
66 | The limited source removal for secondary containment upgrades |
67 | shall be completed no later than 6 months after the department |
68 | issues its approval of the project, and the approval |
69 | automatically expires at the end of the 6 months. Funding for |
70 | Department of Transportation and secondary containment upgrade |
71 | source removals may not exceed $50,000 for a single facility |
72 | unless the department makes a determination that it is cost- |
73 | effective and environmentally beneficial to exceed this amount, |
74 | but in no event shall the department authorize costs in excess |
75 | of $100,000 for a single facility. Department funding for |
76 | limited interim soil-source removals associated with Department |
77 | of Transportation projects and secondary containment upgrades |
78 | shall be limited to supplemental soil assessment, soil |
79 | screening, soil removal, backfill material, treatment or |
80 | disposal of the contaminated soil, dewatering related to the |
81 | contaminated soil removal in an amount of up to 10 percent of |
82 | the total interim soil-source removal project costs, treatment, |
83 | and disposal of the contaminated groundwater and preparation of |
84 | the source removal report. No other costs associated with the |
85 | facility upgrade may be paid with department funds. No more than |
86 | $1 million for Department of Transportation limited source |
87 | removal projects and $10 million for secondary containment |
88 | upgrade limited source removal projects conducted in advance of |
89 | the priority order established under paragraph (a) for site |
90 | cleanup activities shall be encumbered from the Inland |
91 | Protection Trust Fund in any fiscal year. This subparagraph is |
92 | repealed effective June 30, 2010. |
93 | 2.3. Once free product removal and other source removal |
94 | identified in this paragraph are completed at a site, and |
95 | notwithstanding the order established by the priority ranking |
96 | system under paragraph (a) for site cleanup activities, the |
97 | department may reevaluate the site to determine the degree of |
98 | active cleanup needed to continue site rehabilitation. Further, |
99 | the department shall determine if the reevaluated site qualifies |
100 | for natural attenuation monitoring, long-term natural |
101 | attenuation monitoring, or no further action. If additional site |
102 | rehabilitation is necessary to reach no further action status, |
103 | the site rehabilitation shall be conducted in the order |
104 | established by the priority ranking system under paragraph (a). |
105 | and The department shall is encouraged to utilize natural |
106 | attenuation and monitoring strategies and, when cost-effective, |
107 | transition sites eligible for restoration funding assistance to |
108 | long-term natural attenuation monitoring where the plume is |
109 | shrinking or stable and confined to the source property |
110 | boundaries and the petroleum products' chemicals of concern meet |
111 | the natural attenuation default concentrations, as defined by |
112 | department rule. If the plume migrates beyond the source |
113 | property boundaries, natural attenuation monitoring may be |
114 | conducted in accordance with department rule, or if the site no |
115 | longer qualifies for natural attenuation monitoring, active |
116 | remediation may be resumed. For long-term natural attenuation |
117 | monitoring, if the petroleum products' chemicals of concern |
118 | increase or are not significantly reduced after 42 months of |
119 | monitoring, or if the plume migrates beyond the property |
120 | boundaries, active remediation shall be resumed as necessary. |
121 | For sites undergoing active remediation, the department shall |
122 | template the cost of natural attenuation monitoring pursuant to |
123 | s. 376.30711 to ensure that site mobilizations are performed in |
124 | a cost-effective manner. Sites that are not eligible for state |
125 | restoration funding may transition to long-term natural |
126 | attenuation monitoring using the criteria in this subparagraph. |
127 | Nothing in this subparagraph precludes a site from pursuing a |
128 | "No Further Action" order with conditions where site conditions |
129 | warrant. |
130 | 3. The department shall evaluate whether higher natural |
131 | attenuation default concentrations for natural attenuation |
132 | monitoring or long-term natural attenuation monitoring are cost- |
133 | effective and would adequately protect public health and the |
134 | environment. The department shall also evaluate site-specific |
135 | characteristics that would allow for higher natural attenuation |
136 | or long-term natural attenuation concentration levels. |
137 | 4. A local government may not deny a building permit based |
138 | solely on the presence of petroleum contamination for any |
139 | construction, repairs, or renovations performed in conjunction |
140 | with tank upgrade activities to an existing retail fuel facility |
141 | if the facility was fully operational before the building permit |
142 | was requested and if the construction, repair, or renovation is |
143 | performed by a licensed contractor. All building permits and any |
144 | construction, repairs, or renovations performed in conjunction |
145 | with such permits must comply with the applicable provisions of |
146 | chapters 489 and 553. |
147 | (11) |
148 | (b) Low-scored site initiative Nonreimbursable voluntary |
149 | cleanup.-Notwithstanding s. 376.30711, any site For sites with |
150 | releases reported prior to January 1, 1995, the department shall |
151 | issue a determination of "No Further Action" at sites ranked |
152 | with a total priority ranking score of 10 points or less may |
153 | voluntarily participate in the low-scored site initiative, |
154 | whether or not the site is eligible for state restoration |
155 | funding. |
156 | 1. To participate in the low-scored site initiative, the |
157 | responsible party or property owner must affirmatively |
158 | demonstrate that, which meet the following conditions are met: |
159 | a.1. Upon reassessment pursuant to department rule, the |
160 | site retains a priority ranking score of 10 points or less No |
161 | free product exists in wells, boreholes, subsurface utility |
162 | conduits, or vaults or buildings and no other fire or explosion |
163 | hazard exists as a result of a release of petroleum products. |
164 | b.2. No excessively contaminated soil, as defined by |
165 | department rule, exists onsite as a result of a release of |
166 | petroleum products. |
167 | c.3. A minimum of 6 months of groundwater monitoring |
168 | indicates that the plume is shrinking or stable Public supply |
169 | wells for consumptive use of water expected to be affected by |
170 | the site shall not be located within a 1/2-mile radius of the |
171 | site; private supply wells for consumptive use of water expected |
172 | to be affected by the site shall not be located within a 1/4- |
173 | mile radius of the site; and there must be no current or |
174 | projected consumptive use of the water affected by the site for |
175 | at least the following 3 years. Where appropriate, institutional |
176 | controls meeting the requirements of subparagraph (5)(b)4. may |
177 | be required by the department to meet these criteria. |
178 | d.4. The release of petroleum products at the site does |
179 | shall not adversely affect adjacent surface waters, including |
180 | their effects on human health and the environment. |
181 | e.5. The area of groundwater containing the petroleum |
182 | products' chemicals of concern in concentrations greater than |
183 | the boundary values defined in subparagraph 7. is less than one- |
184 | quarter acre and is confined to the source property boundaries |
185 | of the real property on which the discharge originated. |
186 | f.6. Soils onsite that are subject to human exposure found |
187 | between land surface and 2 feet below land surface shall meet |
188 | the soil cleanup target levels criteria established by |
189 | department rule or human exposure is limited by pursuant to sub- |
190 | subparagraph (5)(b)9.a. Where appropriate, institutional or |
191 | engineering controls meeting the requirements of subparagraph |
192 | (5)(b)4. may be required by the department to meet these |
193 | criteria. |
194 | 2. Upon affirmative demonstration of the conditions under |
195 | subparagraph 1., the department shall issue a determination of |
196 | "No Further Action." Such determination acknowledges that |
197 | minimal contamination exists onsite and that such contamination |
198 | is not a threat to human health or the environment. If no |
199 | contamination is detected, the department may issue a site |
200 | rehabilitation completion order. |
201 | 3. Sites that are eligible for state restoration funding |
202 | may receive payment of preapproved costs for the low-scored site |
203 | initiative as follows: |
204 | a. A responsible party or property owner may submit an |
205 | assessment plan designed to affirmatively demonstrate that the |
206 | site meets the conditions under subparagraph 1. Notwithstanding |
207 | the priority ranking score of the site, the department may |
208 | preapprove the cost of the assessment pursuant to s. 376.30711, |
209 | including 6 months of groundwater monitoring, not to exceed |
210 | $30,000 for each site. The department may not pay the costs |
211 | associated with the establishment of institutional or |
212 | engineering controls. |
213 | b. The assessment work shall be completed no later than 6 |
214 | months after the department issues its approval. |
215 | c. No more than $10 million for the low-scored site |
216 | initiative shall be encumbered from the Inland Protection Trust |
217 | Fund in any fiscal year. Funds shall be made available on a |
218 | first-come, first-served basis and shall be limited to 10 sites |
219 | in each fiscal year for each responsible party or property |
220 | owner. |
221 | 7. Concentrations of the petroleum products' chemicals of |
222 | concern in groundwater at the property boundary of the real |
223 | property on which the petroleum contamination originates shall |
224 | not exceed the criteria established pursuant to sub-subparagraph |
225 | (5)(b)7.a. Where appropriate, institutional or engineering |
226 | controls meeting the requirements of subparagraph (5)(b)4. may |
227 | be required by the department to meet these criteria. |
228 | 8. The department is authorized to establish alternate |
229 | cleanup target levels for onsite nonboundary wells pursuant to |
230 | the criteria in subparagraph (5)(b)8. |
231 | 9. A scientific evaluation that demonstrates that the |
232 | boundary criteria in subparagraph 7. will not be exceeded and a |
233 | 1-year site-specific groundwater monitoring plan approved in |
234 | advance by the department validates the scientific evaluation. |
235 | If the boundary criteria in subparagraph 7. are exceeded at any |
236 | time, the department may order an extension of the monitoring |
237 | period for up to 12 additional months from the time of the |
238 | excess reading. The department shall determine the adequacy of |
239 | the groundwater monitoring system at a site. All wells required |
240 | by the department pursuant to this paragraph shall be installed |
241 | before the monitoring period begins. |
242 | 10. Costs associated with activities performed pursuant to |
243 | this paragraph for sites which qualify for a determination of |
244 | "No Further Action" under this paragraph shall not be |
245 | reimbursable from the Inland Protection Trust Fund. |
246 | Section 2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2010. |