1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act for the relief of Eric Brody by the Broward County |
3 | Sheriff's Office; providing for an appropriation to |
4 | compensate Eric Brody for injuries sustained as a result |
5 | of the negligence of the Broward County Sheriff's Office; |
6 | providing a limitation on the payment of fees and costs; |
7 | providing an effective date. |
8 |
|
9 | WHEREAS, on the evening of March 3, 1998, 18-year-old Eric |
10 | Brody, a college-bound high school senior, was returning home |
11 | from his part-time job at the Sawgrass Mills Sports Authority, |
12 | driving his 1982 AMC Concord eastbound on Oakland Park Boulevard |
13 | in Sunrise, Florida, and |
14 | WHEREAS, that same evening, Broward County Sheriff's Deputy |
15 | Christopher Thieman was driving his Broward County Sheriff's |
16 | Office cruiser westbound on Oakland Park Boulevard on his way to |
17 | work at the Weston Station, and |
18 | WHEREAS, at the time that Deputy Thieman left the home of |
19 | his girlfriend, he had less than 15 minutes to travel 11 miles |
20 | in order to make roll call on time. The speed limit on his route |
21 | to the Weston Station was 45 mph, and |
22 | WHEREAS, at approximately 10:36 p.m., Eric Brody attempted |
23 | to make a left-hand turn into his neighborhood at the |
24 | intersection of N.W. 117th Avenue and Oakland Park Boulevard. |
25 | Eric Brody's car cleared two of the three westbound lanes on |
26 | Oakland Park Boulevard. Deputy Thieman, who had been traveling |
27 | in the inside westbound lane closest to the median, suddenly and |
28 | inexplicably steered his vehicle to the right, across the center |
29 | lane and into the outside lane, where the front end of his car |
30 | struck the passenger side of Eric Brody's car, just behind the |
31 | right front wheel and near the passenger door, and |
32 | WHEREAS, Deputy Thieman claimed at trial that he had no |
33 | idea how fast he was traveling and there were no reported |
34 | witnesses to the accident; however, experts for the claimant and |
35 | the defendant testified that Deputy Thieman was driving between |
36 | 60 mph and 70 mph when he struck the passenger side of Eric |
37 | Brody's car, and |
38 | WHEREAS, Eric Brody was found unconscious 6 minutes later |
39 | by paramedics, his head and upper torso leaning upright and |
40 | toward the passenger-side door. Although Eric Brody was out of |
41 | his seat belt, photographs of the accident scene show that the |
42 | seat belt was fully spooled out, with the retractor jammed, |
43 | dangling out of the driver-side door, indicating it had been in |
44 | use at the time and involved in a high-speed impact. The right |
45 | side of Eric Brody's head had struck the intruding passenger- |
46 | side door, causing skull fractures and brain sheering, bruising, |
47 | bleeding, and swelling, and |
48 | WHEREAS, Eric Brody was airlifted by helicopter to Broward |
49 | General Hospital where he was placed on a ventilator and |
50 | underwent an emergency craniotomy. He was in a coma for 6 months |
51 | and underwent extensive rehabilitation, having to relearn how to |
52 | walk and talk, and |
53 | WHEREAS, Eric Brody, who is now 29 years old, has been left |
54 | profoundly brain-injured and lives with his parents. His speech |
55 | is barely intelligible, he has significant memory loss and |
56 | cognitive dysfunction, and he has visual problems. Eric also has |
57 | impaired fine and gross motor skills and has very poor balance. |
58 | Although Eric is able to use a walker for short distances, he |
59 | must mostly uses a wheelchair to get around. The entire left |
60 | side of his body is partially paralyzed and spastic, and he |
61 | needs help with many of his daily functions. Though he has a |
62 | normal life expectancy, Eric Brody is permanently and totally |
63 | disabled, and |
64 | WHEREAS, the Brody family alleged in their lawsuit against |
65 | the Broward County Sheriff's Office that Deputy Thieman was |
66 | negligent in the operation of his vehicle by driving too fast |
67 | and by steering his vehicle two lanes to the right where the |
68 | impact occurred. In reconstructing the accident, experts |
69 | determined that if Deputy Thieman had remained within the inside |
70 | lane, there would have been no collision, and |
71 | WHEREAS, the Broward County Sheriff's Office alleged that |
72 | Eric failed to yield the right-of-way and use his seat belt. |
73 | However, the seat belt expert the Broward Sheriff's Office |
74 | called at trial admitted under cross-examination that the fact |
75 | that the seat belt was spooled out and the retractor jammed was |
76 | consistent with seat belt usage in a high-speed impact, and |
77 | WHEREAS, the Brodys proved at trial that Deputy Thieman's |
78 | speed caused Eric Brody to misjudge the time and distance he had |
79 | to clear the intersection. The Brody's experts re-created the |
80 | accident by conducting an exact car-to-car crash test, using |
81 | identical vehicles, an instrumented hybrid III dummy, and fast- |
82 | action cameras. The crash test demonstrated that regardless of |
83 | the fact that the seat belt was spooled out and the retractor |
84 | was jammed, given the severity of this crash and the significant |
85 | amount of intrusion into the occupant compartment where Eric was |
86 | seated, Eric's head would have made contact with the passenger |
87 | door anyway and a seat belt could not have prevented his |
88 | injuries. During the crash, the test dummy, which was wearing a |
89 | seat belt, struck its head on the passenger door within inches |
90 | of where Eric Brody's head actually struck the passenger door, |
91 | providing additional proof that Eric was wearing a seat belt, |
92 | and |
93 | WHEREAS, on December 1, 2005, a Broward County jury made up |
94 | of three men and three women found that Deputy Thieman and the |
95 | Broward County Sheriff's Office were 100 percent negligent and |
96 | Eric Brody was not comparatively negligent, and rendered a |
97 | $30,690,000 verdict in favor of the then 25-year-old Eric Brody. |
98 | The trial lasted almost 2 months, including a 2-week break due |
99 | to Hurricane Wilma, and |
100 | WHEREAS, judgment was entered shortly after the jury |
101 | verdict for the full amount of $30,690,000, and the court |
102 | entered a cost judgment for $270,372.30, for a total judgment of |
103 | $30,960,372.30. The trial court denied the Broward County |
104 | Sheriff's Office posttrial motions for judgment notwithstanding |
105 | the verdict, new trial, or remittitur. The Broward County |
106 | Sheriff's Office appealed the final judgment but not the cost |
107 | judgment. The Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld the verdict |
108 | and the amount of the verdict in the fall of 2007. The Broward |
109 | County Sheriff's Office subsequently petitioned the Florida |
110 | Supreme Court, which denied the petition in April of 2008. |
111 | Therefore, all legal remedies have been exhausted and a claim |
112 | bill against the Broward County Sheriff's Office is the only |
113 | recourse available to Eric Brody, and |
114 | WHEREAS, before the lawsuit was filed, the Brodys made a |
115 | demand for $3 million, which was the limit of the insurance |
116 | policy of the Broward County Sheriff's Office, reiterated that |
117 | demand at mediation, and gave the carrier additional time after |
118 | mediation to pay the policy limit before the Brody's attorneys |
119 | began the expense of preparing the case for trial. The insurance |
120 | carrier ignored multiple attempts to settle the case and, |
121 | instead, waited until the day the trial judge set the case for |
122 | trial before offering to pay the limit of the policy. By that |
123 | time, nearly $750,000 had been spent preparing the case for |
124 | trial and Eric Brody had liens of nearly $1 million for his |
125 | health care costs. Because so much money had been spent, it was |
126 | determined that settlement was no longer feasible. By the time |
127 | the trial was completed, an additional $250,000 had been spent |
128 | on trial costs, and |
129 | WHEREAS, the failure of the liability insurance carrier for |
130 | the Broward County Sheriff's Office to settle and pay the $3 |
131 | million policy limit when it could and should have done so on |
132 | multiple occasions unreasonably exposed the Broward County |
133 | Sheriff's Office to an excess judgment and claim bill. |
134 | Consequently, upon passage of this claim bill, the Broward |
135 | County Sheriff's Office will have standing to initiate an action |
136 | against the insurer for bad-faith claims practice in order to |
137 | recover the entire amount of the claim bill, and |
138 | WHEREAS, the Broward County Sheriff's Office has paid |
139 | $200,000 pursuant to the limits of liability set forth under s. |
140 | 768.28, Florida Statutes, and |
141 | WHEREAS, Eric Brody seeks the remaining amount of the |
142 | judgment through the submission of a claim bill to the |
143 | Legislature, NOW, THEREFORE, |
144 |
|
145 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
146 |
|
147 | Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act |
148 | are found and declared to be true. |
149 | Section 2. The Sheriff of Broward County is authorized and |
150 | directed to appropriate from funds of the Broward County |
151 | Sheriff's Office not otherwise appropriated and to draw a |
152 | warrant payable to Eric Brody in the sum of $10,000,000 as |
153 | compensation for injuries and damages sustained. |
154 | Section 3. Any amount awarded under this act pursuant to |
155 | the waiver of sovereign immunity permitted under s. 768.28, |
156 | Florida Statutes, and this award is intended to provide the sole |
157 | compensation for all present and future claims arising out of |
158 | the factual situation described in the preamble to this act |
159 | which resulted in the injury to Eric Brody. The total amount |
160 | paid for attorney's fees, lobbying fees, costs, and other |
161 | similar expenses relating to this claim may not exceed 25 |
162 | percent of the total amount awarded under section 2. |
163 | Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |