HB 7071

1
A bill to be entitled
2An act relating to repealing budget provisions; amending
3s. 216.023, F.S.; deleting certain budget summary
4requirements; repealing s. 339.1371, F.S., relating to
5Mobility 2000 funding; amending ss. 216.013, 287.0574, and
6489.145, F.S.; conforming cross-references; providing an
7effective date.
8
9Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
10
11     Section 1.  Subsection (4) of section 216.023, Florida
12Statutes, is amended to read:
13     216.023  Legislative budget requests to be furnished to
14Legislature by agencies.-
15     (4)(a)  The legislative budget request must contain for
16each program:
17     (a)1.  The constitutional or statutory authority for a
18program, a brief purpose statement, and approved program
19components.
20     (b)2.  Information on expenditures for 3 fiscal years
21(actual prior-year expenditures, current-year estimated
22expenditures, and agency budget requested expenditures for the
23next fiscal year) by appropriation category.
24     (c)3.  Details on trust funds and fees.
25     (d)4.  The total number of positions (authorized, fixed,
26and requested).
27     (e)5.  An issue narrative describing and justifying changes
28in amounts and positions requested for current and proposed
29programs for the next fiscal year.
30     (f)6.  Information resource requests.
31     (g)7.  Supporting information, including applicable cost-
32benefit analyses, business case analyses, performance
33contracting procedures, service comparisons, and impacts on
34performance standards for any request to outsource or privatize
35agency functions. The cost-benefit and business case analyses
36must include an assessment of the impact on each affected
37activity from those identified in accordance with paragraph (b).
38Performance standards must include standards for each affected
39activity and be expressed in terms of the associated unit of
40activity.
41     (h)8.  An evaluation of any major outsourcing and
42privatization initiatives undertaken during the last 5 fiscal
43years having aggregate expenditures exceeding $10 million during
44the term of the contract. The evaluation shall include an
45assessment of contractor performance, a comparison of
46anticipated service levels to actual service levels, and a
47comparison of estimated savings to actual savings achieved.
48Consolidated reports issued by the Department of Management
49Services may be used to satisfy this requirement.
50     (i)9.  Supporting information for any proposed consolidated
51financing of deferred-payment commodity contracts including
52guaranteed energy performance savings contracts. Supporting
53information must also include narrative describing and
54justifying the need, baseline for current costs, estimated cost
55savings, projected equipment purchases, estimated contract
56costs, and return on investment calculation.
57     (j)10.  For projects that exceed $10 million in total cost,
58the statutory reference of the existing policy or the proposed
59substantive policy that establishes and defines the project's
60governance structure, planned scope, main business objectives
61that must be achieved, and estimated completion timeframes.
62Information technology budget requests for the continuance of
63existing hardware and software maintenance agreements, renewal
64of existing software licensing agreements, or the replacement of
65desktop units with new technology that is similar to the
66technology currently in use are exempt from this requirement.
67     (b)  It is the intent of the Legislature that total
68accountability measures, including unit-cost data, serve not
69only as a budgeting tool but also as a policymaking tool and an
70accountability tool. Therefore, each state agency and the
71judicial branch must submit a summary of information for the
72preceding year in accordance with the legislative budget
73instructions. Each summary must provide a one-page overview and
74must contain:
75     1.  The final budget for the agency and the judicial
76branch.
77     2.  Total funds from the General Appropriations Act.
78     3.  Adjustments to the General Appropriations Act.
79     4.  The line-item listings of all activities.
80     5.  The number of activity units performed or accomplished.
81     6.  Total expenditures for each activity, including amounts
82paid to contractors and subordinate entities. Expenditures
83related to administrative activities not aligned with output
84measures must consistently be allocated to activities with
85output measures prior to computing unit costs.
86     7.  The cost per unit for each activity, including the
87costs allocated to contractors and subordinate entities.
88     8.  The total amount of reversions and pass-through
89expenditures omitted from unit-cost calculations.
90
91At the regular session immediately following the submission of
92the agency unit cost summary, the Legislature shall reduce in
93the General Appropriations Act for the ensuing fiscal year, by
94an amount equal to at least 10 percent of the allocation for the
95fiscal year preceding the current fiscal year, the funding of
96each state agency that fails to submit the report required under
97this paragraph.
98     Section 2.  Section 339.1371, Florida Statutes, is
99repealed.
100     Section 3.  Paragraph (h) of subsection (1) of section
101216.013, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
102     216.013  Long-range program plan.-State agencies and the
103judicial branch shall develop long-range program plans to
104achieve state goals using an interagency planning process that
105includes the development of integrated agency program service
106outcomes. The plans shall be policy based, priority driven,
107accountable, and developed through careful examination and
108justification of all agency and judicial branch programs.
109     (1)  Long-range program plans shall provide the framework
110for the development of budget requests and shall identify or
111update:
112     (h)  Legislatively approved output and outcome performance
113measures. Each performance measure must identify the associated
114activity contributing to the measure from those identified in
115accordance with s. 216.023(4)(b).
116     Section 4.  Subsection (4) of section 287.0574, Florida
117Statutes, is amended to read:
118     287.0574  Business cases to outsource; review and analysis;
119requirements.-
120     (4)  For any proposed outsourcing, the state agency shall
121develop a business case that justifies the proposal to
122outsource. In order to reduce any administrative burden, the
123council may allow a state agency to submit the business case in
124the form required by the budget instructions issued pursuant to
125s. 216.023(4)(g) s. 216.023(4)(a)7., augmented with additional
126information if necessary, to ensure that the requirements of
127this section are met. The business case is not subject to
128challenge or protest pursuant to chapter 120. The business case
129must include, but need not be limited to:
130     (a)  A detailed description of the service or activity for
131which the outsourcing is proposed.
132     (b)  A description and analysis of the state agency's
133current performance, based on existing performance metrics if
134the state agency is currently performing the service or
135activity.
136     (c)  The goals desired to be achieved through the proposed
137outsourcing and the rationale for such goals.
138     (d)  A citation to the existing or proposed legal authority
139for outsourcing the service or activity.
140     (e)  A description of available options for achieving the
141goals. If state employees are currently performing the service
142or activity, at least one option involving maintaining state
143provision of the service or activity shall be included.
144     (f)  An analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of
145each option, including, at a minimum, potential performance
146improvements and risks.
147     (g)  A description of the current market for the
148contractual services that are under consideration for
149outsourcing.
150     (h)  A cost-benefit analysis documenting the direct and
151indirect specific baseline costs, savings, and qualitative and
152quantitative benefits involved in or resulting from the
153implementation of the recommended option or options. Such
154analysis must specify the schedule that, at a minimum, must be
155adhered to in order to achieve the estimated savings. All
156elements of cost must be clearly identified in the cost-benefit
157analysis, described in the business case, and supported by
158applicable records and reports. The state agency head shall
159attest that, based on the data and information underlying the
160business case, to the best of his or her knowledge, all
161projected costs, savings, and benefits are valid and achievable.
162As used in this section, the term "cost" means the reasonable,
163relevant, and verifiable cost, which may include, but is not
164limited to, elements such as personnel, materials and supplies,
165services, equipment, capital depreciation, rent, maintenance and
166repairs, utilities, insurance, personnel travel, overhead, and
167interim and final payments. The appropriate elements shall
168depend on the nature of the specific initiative. As used in this
169section, the term "savings" means the difference between the
170direct and indirect actual annual baseline costs compared to the
171projected annual cost for the contracted functions or
172responsibilities in any succeeding state fiscal year during the
173term of the contract.
174     (i)  A description of differences among current state
175agency policies and processes and, as appropriate, a discussion
176of options for or a plan to standardize, consolidate, or revise
177current policies and processes, if any, to reduce the
178customization of any proposed solution that would otherwise be
179required.
180     (j)  A description of the specific performance standards
181that must, at a minimum, be met to ensure adequate performance.
182     (k)  The projected timeframe for key events from the
183beginning of the procurement process through the expiration of a
184contract.
185     (l)  A plan to ensure compliance with the public records
186law.
187     (m)  A specific and feasible contingency plan addressing
188contractor nonperformance and a description of the tasks
189involved in and costs required for its implementation.
190     (n)  A state agency's transition plan for addressing
191changes in the number of agency personnel, affected business
192processes, employee transition issues, and communication with
193affected stakeholders, such as agency clients and the public.
194The transition plan must contain a reemployment and retraining
195assistance plan for employees who are not retained by the state
196agency or employed by the contractor.
197     (o)  A plan for ensuring access by persons with
198disabilities in compliance with applicable state and federal
199law.
200     (p)  A description of legislative and budgetary actions
201necessary to accomplish the proposed outsourcing.
202     Section 5.  Paragraph (a) of subsection (6) of section
203489.145, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
204     489.145  Guaranteed energy, water, and wastewater
205performance savings contracting.-
206     (6)  PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND CONTRACT REVIEW.-The
207Department of Management Services, with the assistance of the
208Office of the Chief Financial Officer, shall, within available
209resources, provide technical content assistance to state
210agencies contracting for energy, water, and wastewater
211efficiency and conservation measures and engage in other
212activities considered appropriate by the department for
213promoting and facilitating guaranteed energy, water, and
214wastewater performance contracting by state agencies. The
215Department of Management Services shall review the investment-
216grade audit for each proposed project and certify that the cost
217savings are appropriate and sufficient for the term of the
218contract. The Office of the Chief Financial Officer, with the
219assistance of the Department of Management Services, shall,
220within available resources, develop model contractual and
221related documents for use by state agencies. Prior to entering
222into a guaranteed energy, water, and wastewater performance
223savings contract, any contract or lease for third-party
224financing, or any combination of such contracts, a state agency
225shall submit such proposed contract or lease to the Office of
226the Chief Financial Officer for review and approval. A proposed
227contract or lease shall include:
228     (a)  Supporting information required by s. 216.023(4)(i) s.
229216.023(4)(a)9. in ss. 287.063(5) and 287.064(11). For contracts
230approved under this section, the criteria may, at a minimum,
231include the specification of a benchmark cost of capital and
232minimum real rate of return on energy, water, or wastewater
233savings against which proposals shall be evaluated.
234
235The Office of the Chief Financial Officer shall not approve any
236contract submitted under this section from a state agency that
237does not meet the requirements of this section.
238     Section 6.  This act shall take effect July 1, 2010.


CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.