1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to repealing budget provisions; amending |
3 | s. 216.023, F.S.; deleting certain budget summary |
4 | requirements; repealing s. 339.1371, F.S., relating to |
5 | Mobility 2000 funding; amending ss. 216.013, 287.0574, and |
6 | 489.145, F.S.; conforming cross-references; providing an |
7 | effective date. |
8 |
|
9 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
10 |
|
11 | Section 1. Subsection (4) of section 216.023, Florida |
12 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
13 | 216.023 Legislative budget requests to be furnished to |
14 | Legislature by agencies.- |
15 | (4)(a) The legislative budget request must contain for |
16 | each program: |
17 | (a)1. The constitutional or statutory authority for a |
18 | program, a brief purpose statement, and approved program |
19 | components. |
20 | (b)2. Information on expenditures for 3 fiscal years |
21 | (actual prior-year expenditures, current-year estimated |
22 | expenditures, and agency budget requested expenditures for the |
23 | next fiscal year) by appropriation category. |
24 | (c)3. Details on trust funds and fees. |
25 | (d)4. The total number of positions (authorized, fixed, |
26 | and requested). |
27 | (e)5. An issue narrative describing and justifying changes |
28 | in amounts and positions requested for current and proposed |
29 | programs for the next fiscal year. |
30 | (f)6. Information resource requests. |
31 | (g)7. Supporting information, including applicable cost- |
32 | benefit analyses, business case analyses, performance |
33 | contracting procedures, service comparisons, and impacts on |
34 | performance standards for any request to outsource or privatize |
35 | agency functions. The cost-benefit and business case analyses |
36 | must include an assessment of the impact on each affected |
37 | activity from those identified in accordance with paragraph (b). |
38 | Performance standards must include standards for each affected |
39 | activity and be expressed in terms of the associated unit of |
40 | activity. |
41 | (h)8. An evaluation of any major outsourcing and |
42 | privatization initiatives undertaken during the last 5 fiscal |
43 | years having aggregate expenditures exceeding $10 million during |
44 | the term of the contract. The evaluation shall include an |
45 | assessment of contractor performance, a comparison of |
46 | anticipated service levels to actual service levels, and a |
47 | comparison of estimated savings to actual savings achieved. |
48 | Consolidated reports issued by the Department of Management |
49 | Services may be used to satisfy this requirement. |
50 | (i)9. Supporting information for any proposed consolidated |
51 | financing of deferred-payment commodity contracts including |
52 | guaranteed energy performance savings contracts. Supporting |
53 | information must also include narrative describing and |
54 | justifying the need, baseline for current costs, estimated cost |
55 | savings, projected equipment purchases, estimated contract |
56 | costs, and return on investment calculation. |
57 | (j)10. For projects that exceed $10 million in total cost, |
58 | the statutory reference of the existing policy or the proposed |
59 | substantive policy that establishes and defines the project's |
60 | governance structure, planned scope, main business objectives |
61 | that must be achieved, and estimated completion timeframes. |
62 | Information technology budget requests for the continuance of |
63 | existing hardware and software maintenance agreements, renewal |
64 | of existing software licensing agreements, or the replacement of |
65 | desktop units with new technology that is similar to the |
66 | technology currently in use are exempt from this requirement. |
67 | (b) It is the intent of the Legislature that total |
68 | accountability measures, including unit-cost data, serve not |
69 | only as a budgeting tool but also as a policymaking tool and an |
70 | accountability tool. Therefore, each state agency and the |
71 | judicial branch must submit a summary of information for the |
72 | preceding year in accordance with the legislative budget |
73 | instructions. Each summary must provide a one-page overview and |
74 | must contain: |
75 | 1. The final budget for the agency and the judicial |
76 | branch. |
77 | 2. Total funds from the General Appropriations Act. |
78 | 3. Adjustments to the General Appropriations Act. |
79 | 4. The line-item listings of all activities. |
80 | 5. The number of activity units performed or accomplished. |
81 | 6. Total expenditures for each activity, including amounts |
82 | paid to contractors and subordinate entities. Expenditures |
83 | related to administrative activities not aligned with output |
84 | measures must consistently be allocated to activities with |
85 | output measures prior to computing unit costs. |
86 | 7. The cost per unit for each activity, including the |
87 | costs allocated to contractors and subordinate entities. |
88 | 8. The total amount of reversions and pass-through |
89 | expenditures omitted from unit-cost calculations. |
90 |
|
91 | At the regular session immediately following the submission of |
92 | the agency unit cost summary, the Legislature shall reduce in |
93 | the General Appropriations Act for the ensuing fiscal year, by |
94 | an amount equal to at least 10 percent of the allocation for the |
95 | fiscal year preceding the current fiscal year, the funding of |
96 | each state agency that fails to submit the report required under |
97 | this paragraph. |
98 | Section 2. Section 339.1371, Florida Statutes, is |
99 | repealed. |
100 | Section 3. Paragraph (h) of subsection (1) of section |
101 | 216.013, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
102 | 216.013 Long-range program plan.-State agencies and the |
103 | judicial branch shall develop long-range program plans to |
104 | achieve state goals using an interagency planning process that |
105 | includes the development of integrated agency program service |
106 | outcomes. The plans shall be policy based, priority driven, |
107 | accountable, and developed through careful examination and |
108 | justification of all agency and judicial branch programs. |
109 | (1) Long-range program plans shall provide the framework |
110 | for the development of budget requests and shall identify or |
111 | update: |
112 | (h) Legislatively approved output and outcome performance |
113 | measures. Each performance measure must identify the associated |
114 | activity contributing to the measure from those identified in |
115 | accordance with s. 216.023(4)(b). |
116 | Section 4. Subsection (4) of section 287.0574, Florida |
117 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
118 | 287.0574 Business cases to outsource; review and analysis; |
119 | requirements.- |
120 | (4) For any proposed outsourcing, the state agency shall |
121 | develop a business case that justifies the proposal to |
122 | outsource. In order to reduce any administrative burden, the |
123 | council may allow a state agency to submit the business case in |
124 | the form required by the budget instructions issued pursuant to |
125 | s. 216.023(4)(g) s. 216.023(4)(a)7., augmented with additional |
126 | information if necessary, to ensure that the requirements of |
127 | this section are met. The business case is not subject to |
128 | challenge or protest pursuant to chapter 120. The business case |
129 | must include, but need not be limited to: |
130 | (a) A detailed description of the service or activity for |
131 | which the outsourcing is proposed. |
132 | (b) A description and analysis of the state agency's |
133 | current performance, based on existing performance metrics if |
134 | the state agency is currently performing the service or |
135 | activity. |
136 | (c) The goals desired to be achieved through the proposed |
137 | outsourcing and the rationale for such goals. |
138 | (d) A citation to the existing or proposed legal authority |
139 | for outsourcing the service or activity. |
140 | (e) A description of available options for achieving the |
141 | goals. If state employees are currently performing the service |
142 | or activity, at least one option involving maintaining state |
143 | provision of the service or activity shall be included. |
144 | (f) An analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of |
145 | each option, including, at a minimum, potential performance |
146 | improvements and risks. |
147 | (g) A description of the current market for the |
148 | contractual services that are under consideration for |
149 | outsourcing. |
150 | (h) A cost-benefit analysis documenting the direct and |
151 | indirect specific baseline costs, savings, and qualitative and |
152 | quantitative benefits involved in or resulting from the |
153 | implementation of the recommended option or options. Such |
154 | analysis must specify the schedule that, at a minimum, must be |
155 | adhered to in order to achieve the estimated savings. All |
156 | elements of cost must be clearly identified in the cost-benefit |
157 | analysis, described in the business case, and supported by |
158 | applicable records and reports. The state agency head shall |
159 | attest that, based on the data and information underlying the |
160 | business case, to the best of his or her knowledge, all |
161 | projected costs, savings, and benefits are valid and achievable. |
162 | As used in this section, the term "cost" means the reasonable, |
163 | relevant, and verifiable cost, which may include, but is not |
164 | limited to, elements such as personnel, materials and supplies, |
165 | services, equipment, capital depreciation, rent, maintenance and |
166 | repairs, utilities, insurance, personnel travel, overhead, and |
167 | interim and final payments. The appropriate elements shall |
168 | depend on the nature of the specific initiative. As used in this |
169 | section, the term "savings" means the difference between the |
170 | direct and indirect actual annual baseline costs compared to the |
171 | projected annual cost for the contracted functions or |
172 | responsibilities in any succeeding state fiscal year during the |
173 | term of the contract. |
174 | (i) A description of differences among current state |
175 | agency policies and processes and, as appropriate, a discussion |
176 | of options for or a plan to standardize, consolidate, or revise |
177 | current policies and processes, if any, to reduce the |
178 | customization of any proposed solution that would otherwise be |
179 | required. |
180 | (j) A description of the specific performance standards |
181 | that must, at a minimum, be met to ensure adequate performance. |
182 | (k) The projected timeframe for key events from the |
183 | beginning of the procurement process through the expiration of a |
184 | contract. |
185 | (l) A plan to ensure compliance with the public records |
186 | law. |
187 | (m) A specific and feasible contingency plan addressing |
188 | contractor nonperformance and a description of the tasks |
189 | involved in and costs required for its implementation. |
190 | (n) A state agency's transition plan for addressing |
191 | changes in the number of agency personnel, affected business |
192 | processes, employee transition issues, and communication with |
193 | affected stakeholders, such as agency clients and the public. |
194 | The transition plan must contain a reemployment and retraining |
195 | assistance plan for employees who are not retained by the state |
196 | agency or employed by the contractor. |
197 | (o) A plan for ensuring access by persons with |
198 | disabilities in compliance with applicable state and federal |
199 | law. |
200 | (p) A description of legislative and budgetary actions |
201 | necessary to accomplish the proposed outsourcing. |
202 | Section 5. Paragraph (a) of subsection (6) of section |
203 | 489.145, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
204 | 489.145 Guaranteed energy, water, and wastewater |
205 | performance savings contracting.- |
206 | (6) PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND CONTRACT REVIEW.-The |
207 | Department of Management Services, with the assistance of the |
208 | Office of the Chief Financial Officer, shall, within available |
209 | resources, provide technical content assistance to state |
210 | agencies contracting for energy, water, and wastewater |
211 | efficiency and conservation measures and engage in other |
212 | activities considered appropriate by the department for |
213 | promoting and facilitating guaranteed energy, water, and |
214 | wastewater performance contracting by state agencies. The |
215 | Department of Management Services shall review the investment- |
216 | grade audit for each proposed project and certify that the cost |
217 | savings are appropriate and sufficient for the term of the |
218 | contract. The Office of the Chief Financial Officer, with the |
219 | assistance of the Department of Management Services, shall, |
220 | within available resources, develop model contractual and |
221 | related documents for use by state agencies. Prior to entering |
222 | into a guaranteed energy, water, and wastewater performance |
223 | savings contract, any contract or lease for third-party |
224 | financing, or any combination of such contracts, a state agency |
225 | shall submit such proposed contract or lease to the Office of |
226 | the Chief Financial Officer for review and approval. A proposed |
227 | contract or lease shall include: |
228 | (a) Supporting information required by s. 216.023(4)(i) s. |
229 | 216.023(4)(a)9. in ss. 287.063(5) and 287.064(11). For contracts |
230 | approved under this section, the criteria may, at a minimum, |
231 | include the specification of a benchmark cost of capital and |
232 | minimum real rate of return on energy, water, or wastewater |
233 | savings against which proposals shall be evaluated. |
234 |
|
235 | The Office of the Chief Financial Officer shall not approve any |
236 | contract submitted under this section from a state agency that |
237 | does not meet the requirements of this section. |
238 | Section 6. This act shall take effect July 1, 2010. |