1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act for the relief of Lawrence Femminella by the Palm |
3 | Beach County Sheriff's Office; providing for an |
4 | appropriation to compensate Lawrence Femminella for loss |
5 | of consortium, false arrest, and the negligent training |
6 | and hiring of deputy sheriffs by the Palm Beach County |
7 | Sheriff's Office; providing a limitation on the payment of |
8 | fees and costs; providing an effective date. |
9 |
|
10 | WHEREAS, Lawrence Femminella was employed by the Palm Beach |
11 | County Sherriff's Office as a correctional officer and deputy |
12 | sheriff and resided in Palm Beach County, and |
13 | WHEREAS, in March, 2003, Willoughby Farr was confined to |
14 | the Palm Beach County jail awaiting sentencing on various felony |
15 | charges for which he was facing a long prison term. In an effort |
16 | to avoid a lengthy prison term and to garner favors from law |
17 | enforcement officers, Farr concocted a story in which he claimed |
18 | that several correctional officers were smuggling drugs into the |
19 | Palm Beach County jail, and |
20 | WHEREAS, to further his scheme, Farr enrolled the |
21 | assistance of Danny Negrych, who was a former correctional |
22 | officer from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. Together |
23 | Farr and Negrych fabricated a story in which Negrych claimed to |
24 | be a member of a ring of correctional officers who regularly |
25 | smuggled narcotic drugs into the jail. Farr then contacted the |
26 | Organized Crime Bureau of the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office |
27 | and told his fabricated story, and |
28 | WHEREAS, Detective Jeffrey Clarke and Sergeant Jones, who |
29 | were assigned to investigate Farr's drug smuggling allegations, |
30 | used Farr as a confidential informant. Deputy Clarke did not |
31 | have any prior training in investigating narcotics cases even |
32 | though he was designated as the lead detective in the |
33 | investigation, and |
34 | WHEREAS, Farr and the detectives agreed that if Farr |
35 | provided evidence of the drug smuggling activities involving the |
36 | correctional officers, the detectives would testify at Farr's |
37 | sentencing in order to get Farr a more lenient sentence, and |
38 | WHEREAS, on three separate occasions Negrych and Farr |
39 | arranged for cocaine and other illicit drugs to be delivered to |
40 | the jail, but Lawrence Femminella was not involved in any of the |
41 | deliveries, and |
42 | WHEREAS, in late June 2003, Farr was released on bond with |
43 | the help of the detectives. The purpose of the release was to |
44 | facilitate the criminal investigation regarding the alleged drug |
45 | smuggling activities that involved certain correctional |
46 | officers, and |
47 | WHEREAS, after his release, Farr claimed he could meet with |
48 | Lawrence Femminella to discuss drugs. Farr had Negrych contact |
49 | Femminella to arrange a meeting. The purpose of the meeting, as |
50 | stated by Negrych to Femminella, was to interest Lawrence |
51 | Femminella in starting a landscaping business. A meeting was |
52 | arranged for July 8, 2003, at a local restaurant, and |
53 | WHEREAS, Lawrence Femminella appeared at the scheduled |
54 | meeting expecting to meet Negrych, who failed to appear. |
55 | Instead, Farr met with Femminella claiming that Negrych was |
56 | unable to attend. The meeting was monitored and recorded by the |
57 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office and there were no discussions |
58 | about narcotics at the meeting. Femminella and Negrych discussed |
59 | only the landscaping business, and |
60 | WHEREAS, in late July 2003, Farr was arrested again for |
61 | violating the terms of his bond. After his arrest, Farr |
62 | continued his role as an informant for the Palm Beach County |
63 | Sheriff's Office and placed telephone calls to Negrych regarding |
64 | the delivery of narcotics into the jail, and |
65 | WHEREAS, during this period Farr also placed several calls |
66 | to Lawrence Femminella's cellular telephone and on each occasion |
67 | left a message asking Lawrence Femminella to return the call. In |
68 | response to Farr's several messages, Lawrence Femminella |
69 | returned the call on a single occasion and left a message for |
70 | Farr to quit contacting him. Afterward, Femminella changed his |
71 | cellular telephone number in order to avoid Farr's calls, and |
72 | WHEREAS, in early September 2003, Farr also made several |
73 | telephone calls to a woman who identified herself as Lawrence |
74 | Femminella's wife Gayle, and they discussed the smuggling of |
75 | drugs into the jail. It was these telephone calls that led to |
76 | the arrest of Gayle Femminella, along with her husband Lawrence |
77 | Femminella. It was later determined that the woman was not Gayle |
78 | Femminella but an imposter hired by Farr and Negrych to further |
79 | their scheme, and |
80 | WHEREAS, during the telephone call between Farr and the |
81 | female impersonator posing as Gayle Femminella, the two would |
82 | discuss having Lawrence Femminella deliver drugs to Farr in |
83 | jail. The female impersonator then requested the moneys for the |
84 | drugs to be delivered to the Femminella's home and for |
85 | Femminella to deliver the narcotics to Farr, and |
86 | WHEREAS, on September 10, 2003, two undercover agents |
87 | wearing recording devices attempted to deliver moneys to the |
88 | Femminella's home. Gayle Femminella answered the door and the |
89 | agents told Mrs. Femminella that they were delivering money for |
90 | Farr. Not only did Gayle Femminella refuse to accept the money, |
91 | she was described by police as being confused as to why the |
92 | police were at her house. She immediately called her husband who |
93 | was at work at the jail and reported the incident to him. The |
94 | agents' encounter with Gayle Femminella was recorded by |
95 | detectives from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. The |
96 | detectives realized that the voice of Gayle Femminella was |
97 | completely different from the voice recording of the female |
98 | impersonator, and |
99 | WHEREAS, alarmed by the unusual events, including the |
100 | messages from Farr, the visit to his home by unknown persons |
101 | offering money from Farr, and the July 8th meeting with Farr, |
102 | Lawrence Femminella immediately wrote a letter to his supervisor |
103 | at the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office which explained the |
104 | events involving the meeting on July 8, 2003, the unsolicited |
105 | phone calls, and the visits to his home with the offer of money, |
106 | and |
107 | WHEREAS, on the evening of September 11, 2003, Lawrence |
108 | Femminella and his wife Gayle Femminella were arrested at their |
109 | home in the presence of their children, taken in handcuffs to |
110 | jail, and held in a jail cell at the Palm Beach County jail |
111 | where they were interviewed. When the detectives confronted |
112 | Gayle Femminella about tape recordings that appeared to |
113 | incriminated her, Mrs. Femminella asked to hear the tapes. When |
114 | the detectives played the tapes, it became readily apparent that |
115 | the female's voice on the tape was not the voice of Gayle |
116 | Femminella, and |
117 | WHEREAS, on September 12, 2003, the detectives interviewed |
118 | Farr and confronted him with the fabricated evidence against |
119 | Gayle Femminella. According to the detectives, Farr admitted |
120 | that he had fabricated much of the evidence in order to get a |
121 | more lenient sentence, and |
122 | WHEREAS, Deputy Clarke commenced the criminal investigation |
123 | of Farr's allegations of the smuggling of illicit drugs into the |
124 | Palm Beach County jail in May of 2003, which terminated in |
125 | November 2004. At the conclusion of the investigation, the |
126 | Femminellas were completely exonerated and received a personal |
127 | apology from the Sheriff, and |
128 | WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the criminal investigation, |
129 | the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office conducted an internal |
130 | affairs investigation. The internal affairs investigation |
131 | concluded that Deputy Clarke was guilty of neglect of duty and |
132 | that the accusations against the Femminellas were totally |
133 | unfounded and without merit, and |
134 | WHEREAS, on May 11, 2005, Lawrence Femminella filed an |
135 | Amended Complaint against the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office |
136 | for false arrest, negligent training and hiring of its deputies, |
137 | and loss of consortium, and |
138 | WHEREAS, the case of Lawrence Femminella was tried before a |
139 | jury, and on February 6, 2006, the jury returned a verdict in |
140 | favor of Lawrence Femminella, and a final judgment in favor of |
141 | Lawrence Femminella in the sum of $816,200 was entered against |
142 | the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office on February 8, 2006, and |
143 | WHEREAS, Lawrence Femminella has been paid $100,000 by the |
144 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, and he seeks satisfaction in |
145 | the amount of $716,200, the balance of the final judgment, NOW, |
146 | THEREFORE, |
147 |
|
148 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
149 |
|
150 | Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act |
151 | are found and declared to be true. |
152 | Section 2. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office is |
153 | authorized and directed to appropriate from funds of the county |
154 | not otherwise appropriated and to draw a warrant in the sum of |
155 | $716,200, payable to Lawrence Femminella, as compensation for |
156 | loss of consortium, false arrest, and the negligent training and |
157 | hiring of deputy sheriffs by the Palm Beach County Sheriff's |
158 | Office. |
159 | Section 3. The amount paid by the Palm Beach County |
160 | Sheriff's Office and the amount awarded under this act are |
161 | intended to provide the sole compensation for all present and |
162 | future claims arising out of the factual situation described in |
163 | this act regarding Lawrence Femminella. The total amount paid |
164 | for attorney's fees, lobbying fees, costs, and other similar |
165 | expenses relating to this claim may not exceed 25 percent of the |
166 | amount awarded under this act. |
167 | Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |