| 1 | A bill to be entitled |
| 2 | An act for the relief of Lawrence Femminella by the Palm |
| 3 | Beach County Sheriff's Office; providing for an |
| 4 | appropriation to compensate Lawrence Femminella for loss |
| 5 | of consortium, false arrest, and the negligent training |
| 6 | and hiring of deputy sheriffs by the Palm Beach County |
| 7 | Sheriff's Office; providing a limitation on the payment of |
| 8 | fees and costs; providing an effective date. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 | WHEREAS, Lawrence Femminella was employed by the Palm Beach |
| 11 | County Sherriff's Office as a correctional officer and deputy |
| 12 | sheriff and resided in Palm Beach County, and |
| 13 | WHEREAS, in March, 2003, Willoughby Farr was confined to |
| 14 | the Palm Beach County jail awaiting sentencing on various felony |
| 15 | charges for which he was facing a long prison term. In an effort |
| 16 | to avoid a lengthy prison term and to garner favors from law |
| 17 | enforcement officers, Farr concocted a story in which he claimed |
| 18 | that several correctional officers were smuggling drugs into the |
| 19 | Palm Beach County jail, and |
| 20 | WHEREAS, to further his scheme, Farr enrolled the |
| 21 | assistance of Danny Negrych, who was a former correctional |
| 22 | officer from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. Together |
| 23 | Farr and Negrych fabricated a story in which Negrych claimed to |
| 24 | be a member of a ring of correctional officers who regularly |
| 25 | smuggled narcotic drugs into the jail. Farr then contacted the |
| 26 | Organized Crime Bureau of the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office |
| 27 | and told his fabricated story, and |
| 28 | WHEREAS, Detective Jeffrey Clarke and Sergeant Jones, who |
| 29 | were assigned to investigate Farr's drug smuggling allegations, |
| 30 | used Farr as a confidential informant. Deputy Clarke did not |
| 31 | have any prior training in investigating narcotics cases even |
| 32 | though he was designated as the lead detective in the |
| 33 | investigation, and |
| 34 | WHEREAS, Farr and the detectives agreed that if Farr |
| 35 | provided evidence of the drug smuggling activities involving the |
| 36 | correctional officers, the detectives would testify at Farr's |
| 37 | sentencing in order to get Farr a more lenient sentence, and |
| 38 | WHEREAS, on three separate occasions Negrych and Farr |
| 39 | arranged for cocaine and other illicit drugs to be delivered to |
| 40 | the jail, but Lawrence Femminella was not involved in any of the |
| 41 | deliveries, and |
| 42 | WHEREAS, in late June 2003, Farr was released on bond with |
| 43 | the help of the detectives. The purpose of the release was to |
| 44 | facilitate the criminal investigation regarding the alleged drug |
| 45 | smuggling activities that involved certain correctional |
| 46 | officers, and |
| 47 | WHEREAS, after his release, Farr claimed he could meet with |
| 48 | Lawrence Femminella to discuss drugs. Farr had Negrych contact |
| 49 | Femminella to arrange a meeting. The purpose of the meeting, as |
| 50 | stated by Negrych to Femminella, was to interest Lawrence |
| 51 | Femminella in starting a landscaping business. A meeting was |
| 52 | arranged for July 8, 2003, at a local restaurant, and |
| 53 | WHEREAS, Lawrence Femminella appeared at the scheduled |
| 54 | meeting expecting to meet Negrych, who failed to appear. |
| 55 | Instead, Farr met with Femminella claiming that Negrych was |
| 56 | unable to attend. The meeting was monitored and recorded by the |
| 57 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office and there were no discussions |
| 58 | about narcotics at the meeting. Femminella and Negrych discussed |
| 59 | only the landscaping business, and |
| 60 | WHEREAS, in late July 2003, Farr was arrested again for |
| 61 | violating the terms of his bond. After his arrest, Farr |
| 62 | continued his role as an informant for the Palm Beach County |
| 63 | Sheriff's Office and placed telephone calls to Negrych regarding |
| 64 | the delivery of narcotics into the jail, and |
| 65 | WHEREAS, during this period Farr also placed several calls |
| 66 | to Lawrence Femminella's cellular telephone and on each occasion |
| 67 | left a message asking Lawrence Femminella to return the call. In |
| 68 | response to Farr's several messages, Lawrence Femminella |
| 69 | returned the call on a single occasion and left a message for |
| 70 | Farr to quit contacting him. Afterward, Femminella changed his |
| 71 | cellular telephone number in order to avoid Farr's calls, and |
| 72 | WHEREAS, in early September 2003, Farr also made several |
| 73 | telephone calls to a woman who identified herself as Lawrence |
| 74 | Femminella's wife Gayle, and they discussed the smuggling of |
| 75 | drugs into the jail. It was these telephone calls that led to |
| 76 | the arrest of Gayle Femminella, along with her husband Lawrence |
| 77 | Femminella. It was later determined that the woman was not Gayle |
| 78 | Femminella but an imposter hired by Farr and Negrych to further |
| 79 | their scheme, and |
| 80 | WHEREAS, during the telephone call between Farr and the |
| 81 | female impersonator posing as Gayle Femminella, the two would |
| 82 | discuss having Lawrence Femminella deliver drugs to Farr in |
| 83 | jail. The female impersonator then requested the moneys for the |
| 84 | drugs to be delivered to the Femminella's home and for |
| 85 | Femminella to deliver the narcotics to Farr, and |
| 86 | WHEREAS, on September 10, 2003, two undercover agents |
| 87 | wearing recording devices attempted to deliver moneys to the |
| 88 | Femminella's home. Gayle Femminella answered the door and the |
| 89 | agents told Mrs. Femminella that they were delivering money for |
| 90 | Farr. Not only did Gayle Femminella refuse to accept the money, |
| 91 | she was described by police as being confused as to why the |
| 92 | police were at her house. She immediately called her husband who |
| 93 | was at work at the jail and reported the incident to him. The |
| 94 | agents' encounter with Gayle Femminella was recorded by |
| 95 | detectives from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. The |
| 96 | detectives realized that the voice of Gayle Femminella was |
| 97 | completely different from the voice recording of the female |
| 98 | impersonator, and |
| 99 | WHEREAS, alarmed by the unusual events, including the |
| 100 | messages from Farr, the visit to his home by unknown persons |
| 101 | offering money from Farr, and the July 8th meeting with Farr, |
| 102 | Lawrence Femminella immediately wrote a letter to his supervisor |
| 103 | at the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office which explained the |
| 104 | events involving the meeting on July 8, 2003, the unsolicited |
| 105 | phone calls, and the visits to his home with the offer of money, |
| 106 | and |
| 107 | WHEREAS, on the evening of September 11, 2003, Lawrence |
| 108 | Femminella and his wife Gayle Femminella were arrested at their |
| 109 | home in the presence of their children, taken in handcuffs to |
| 110 | jail, and held in a jail cell at the Palm Beach County jail |
| 111 | where they were interviewed. When the detectives confronted |
| 112 | Gayle Femminella about tape recordings that appeared to |
| 113 | incriminated her, Mrs. Femminella asked to hear the tapes. When |
| 114 | the detectives played the tapes, it became readily apparent that |
| 115 | the female's voice on the tape was not the voice of Gayle |
| 116 | Femminella, and |
| 117 | WHEREAS, on September 12, 2003, the detectives interviewed |
| 118 | Farr and confronted him with the fabricated evidence against |
| 119 | Gayle Femminella. According to the detectives, Farr admitted |
| 120 | that he had fabricated much of the evidence in order to get a |
| 121 | more lenient sentence, and |
| 122 | WHEREAS, Deputy Clarke commenced the criminal investigation |
| 123 | of Farr's allegations of the smuggling of illicit drugs into the |
| 124 | Palm Beach County jail in May of 2003, which terminated in |
| 125 | November 2004. At the conclusion of the investigation, the |
| 126 | Femminellas were completely exonerated and received a personal |
| 127 | apology from the Sheriff, and |
| 128 | WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the criminal investigation, |
| 129 | the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office conducted an internal |
| 130 | affairs investigation. The internal affairs investigation |
| 131 | concluded that Deputy Clarke was guilty of neglect of duty and |
| 132 | that the accusations against the Femminellas were totally |
| 133 | unfounded and without merit, and |
| 134 | WHEREAS, on May 11, 2005, Lawrence Femminella filed an |
| 135 | Amended Complaint against the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office |
| 136 | for false arrest, negligent training and hiring of its deputies, |
| 137 | and loss of consortium, and |
| 138 | WHEREAS, the case of Lawrence Femminella was tried before a |
| 139 | jury, and on February 6, 2006, the jury returned a verdict in |
| 140 | favor of Lawrence Femminella, and a final judgment in favor of |
| 141 | Lawrence Femminella in the sum of $816,200 was entered against |
| 142 | the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office on February 8, 2006, and |
| 143 | WHEREAS, Lawrence Femminella has been paid $100,000 by the |
| 144 | Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, and he seeks satisfaction in |
| 145 | the amount of $716,200, the balance of the final judgment, NOW, |
| 146 | THEREFORE, |
| 147 |
|
| 148 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 149 |
|
| 150 | Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act |
| 151 | are found and declared to be true. |
| 152 | Section 2. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office is |
| 153 | authorized and directed to appropriate from funds of the county |
| 154 | not otherwise appropriated and to draw a warrant in the sum of |
| 155 | $716,200, payable to Lawrence Femminella, as compensation for |
| 156 | loss of consortium, false arrest, and the negligent training and |
| 157 | hiring of deputy sheriffs by the Palm Beach County Sheriff's |
| 158 | Office. |
| 159 | Section 3. The amount paid by the Palm Beach County |
| 160 | Sheriff's Office and the amount awarded under this act are |
| 161 | intended to provide the sole compensation for all present and |
| 162 | future claims arising out of the factual situation described in |
| 163 | this act regarding Lawrence Femminella. The total amount paid |
| 164 | for attorney's fees, lobbying fees, costs, and other similar |
| 165 | expenses relating to this claim may not exceed 25 percent of the |
| 166 | amount awarded under this act. |
| 167 | Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |