| 1 | House Memorial |
| 2 | A memorial to the Congress of the United States, urging |
| 3 | Congress to keep the United States Environmental |
| 4 | Protection Agency from overextending its mandate and to |
| 5 | direct the agency not to intrude into Florida's previously |
| 6 | approved clean water program. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 | WHEREAS, on December 7, 2010, the State of Florida filed a |
| 9 | lawsuit against the United States Environmental Protection |
| 10 | Agency over federal intrusion into Florida's clean water |
| 11 | program, and |
| 12 | WHEREAS, the lawsuit alleges that the agency's action is |
| 13 | inconsistent with the intent of Congress when it based the Clean |
| 14 | Water Act on the idea of cooperative federalism whereby the |
| 15 | states would be responsible for the control of water quality |
| 16 | with oversight by the agency, and |
| 17 | WHEREAS, the control of nutrient loading from predominately |
| 18 | nonpoint sources involves traditional states' rights and |
| 19 | responsibilities for water and land resource management, which |
| 20 | Congress expressly intended to preserve in the Clean Water Act, |
| 21 | and |
| 22 | WHEREAS, the lawsuit specifically alleges that the agency's |
| 23 | rule and its January 2009 necessity determination for adopting |
| 24 | numeric nutrient water quality criteria for Florida's waters |
| 25 | were arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion, and |
| 26 | requests the court to enjoin the agency's administrator from |
| 27 | implementing the numeric water quality criteria for Florida in |
| 28 | the rule, and |
| 29 | WHEREAS, prior to the agency's announcement that it would |
| 30 | be implementing new rules for Florida, the state had been |
| 31 | diligently working through its Total Maximum Daily Load Program |
| 32 | to adopt numeric standards for impaired bodies of water, and |
| 33 | WHEREAS, the agency had already approved Florida's Total |
| 34 | Maximum Daily Load Program on the basis that it was sufficient |
| 35 | to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act, as referenced |
| 36 | in a letter dated September 28, 2007, and |
| 37 | WHEREAS, as recently as January 2010, the agency praised |
| 38 | Florida for implementing "some of the most progressive nutrient |
| 39 | management strategies in the nation," and the Total Maximum |
| 40 | Daily Load Program had a timetable for implementation through |
| 41 | 2011, and |
| 42 | WHEREAS, despite the fact that Florida was working to |
| 43 | implement its approved program and was seeing successes, the |
| 44 | agency reversed its determinations in 2009 and informed the |
| 45 | state that new federal rules and criteria would be developed and |
| 46 | implemented by the agency, preempting the approved state |
| 47 | program, and |
| 48 | WHEREAS, according to the state's lawsuit, the agency has |
| 49 | continued to rely on a methodology that is neither |
| 50 | scientifically sound nor site specific for Florida's waters, and |
| 51 | WHEREAS, in April, the agency's own Science Advisory Board |
| 52 | joined the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the |
| 53 | Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the |
| 54 | University of Florida's Institute of Food and Agricultural |
| 55 | Sciences, the Florida Legislature, and others in expressing |
| 56 | serious concerns that the agency's methods for developing |
| 57 | numeric nutrient water quality criteria are scientifically |
| 58 | flawed, and |
| 59 | WHEREAS, the State of Florida has significant concerns with |
| 60 | regard to the cost of implementing the new numeric nutrient |
| 61 | water quality criteria proposed by the agency, NOW, THEREFORE, |
| 62 |
|
| 63 | Be It Resolved by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 64 |
|
| 65 | That the Congress of the United States is urged to keep the |
| 66 | United States Environmental Protection Agency from overextending |
| 67 | its mandate and to direct the agency not to intrude into |
| 68 | Florida's previously approved clean water program. |
| 69 | BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be |
| 70 | dispatched to the President of the United States, to the |
| 71 | President of the United States Senate, to the Speaker of the |
| 72 | United States House of Representatives, and to each member of |
| 73 | the Florida delegation to the United States Congress. |