1 | Representative Saunders offered the following: |
2 |
|
3 | Amendment (with title amendment) |
4 | Remove everything after the enacting clause and insert: |
5 | Section 1. Subsection (31) of section 163.3164, Florida |
6 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
7 | 163.3164 Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land |
8 | Development Regulation Act; definitions.-As used in this act: |
9 | (31) "Optional Sector plan" means the an optional process |
10 | authorized by s. 163.3245 in which one or more local governments |
11 | by agreement with the state land planning agency are allowed to |
12 | address development-of-regional-impact issues within certain |
13 | designated geographic areas identified in the local |
14 | comprehensive plan as a means of fostering innovative planning |
15 | and development strategies in s. 163.3177(11)(a) and (b), |
16 | furthering the purposes of this part and part I of chapter 380, |
17 | reducing overlapping data and analysis requirements, protecting |
18 | regionally significant resources and facilities, and addressing |
19 | extrajurisdictional impacts. The term includes an optional |
20 | sector plan that was adopted pursuant to the optional sector |
21 | plan program. |
22 | Section 2. Paragraph (d) of subsection (15) of section |
23 | 163.3177, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
24 | 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive |
25 | plan; studies and surveys.- |
26 | (15) |
27 | (d) This subsection does not apply to a an optional sector |
28 | plan adopted pursuant to s. 163.3245, a rural land stewardship |
29 | area designated pursuant to subsection (11), or any |
30 | comprehensive plan amendment that includes an inland port |
31 | terminal or affiliated port development. |
32 | Section 3. Paragraph (a) of subsection (12) of section |
33 | 163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
34 | 163.3180 Concurrency.- |
35 | (12)(a) A development of regional impact may satisfy the |
36 | transportation concurrency requirements of the local |
37 | comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency |
38 | management system, and s. 380.06 by payment of a proportionate- |
39 | share contribution for local and regionally significant traffic |
40 | impacts, if: |
41 | 1. The development of regional impact which, based on its |
42 | location or mix of land uses, is designed to encourage |
43 | pedestrian or other nonautomotive modes of transportation; |
44 | 2. The proportionate-share contribution for local and |
45 | regionally significant traffic impacts is sufficient to pay for |
46 | one or more required mobility improvements that will benefit a |
47 | regionally significant transportation facility; |
48 | 3. The owner and developer of the development of regional |
49 | impact pays or assures payment of the proportionate-share |
50 | contribution; and |
51 | 4. If the regionally significant transportation facility |
52 | to be constructed or improved is under the maintenance authority |
53 | of a governmental entity, as defined by s. 334.03(12), other |
54 | than the local government with jurisdiction over the development |
55 | of regional impact, the developer is required to enter into a |
56 | binding and legally enforceable commitment to transfer funds to |
57 | the governmental entity having maintenance authority or to |
58 | otherwise assure construction or improvement of the facility. |
59 |
|
60 | The proportionate-share contribution may be applied to any |
61 | transportation facility to satisfy the provisions of this |
62 | subsection and the local comprehensive plan, but, for the |
63 | purposes of this subsection, the amount of the proportionate- |
64 | share contribution shall be calculated based upon the cumulative |
65 | number of trips from the proposed development expected to reach |
66 | roadways during the peak hour from the complete buildout of a |
67 | stage or phase being approved, divided by the change in the peak |
68 | hour maximum service volume of roadways resulting from |
69 | construction of an improvement necessary to maintain the adopted |
70 | level of service, multiplied by the construction cost, at the |
71 | time of developer payment, of the improvement necessary to |
72 | maintain the adopted level of service. For purposes of this |
73 | subsection, "construction cost" includes all associated costs of |
74 | the improvement. Proportionate-share mitigation shall be limited |
75 | to ensure that a development of regional impact meeting the |
76 | requirements of this subsection mitigates its impact on the |
77 | transportation system but is not responsible for the additional |
78 | cost of reducing or eliminating backlogs. This subsection also |
79 | applies to Florida Quality Developments pursuant to s. 380.061 |
80 | and to detailed specific area plans implementing optional sector |
81 | plans pursuant to s. 163.3245. |
82 | Section 4. Paragraph (c) of subsection (11) of section |
83 | 163.3184, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
84 | 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or |
85 | plan amendment.- |
86 | (11) ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION.- |
87 | (c) The sanctions provided by paragraphs (a) and (b) shall |
88 | not apply to a local government regarding any plan amendment, |
89 | except for plan amendments that amend plans that have not been |
90 | finally determined to be in compliance with this part, and |
91 | except as provided in s. 163.3189(2) or s. 163.3191(9)(11). |
92 | Section 5. Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, is amended |
93 | to read: |
94 | 163.3191 Evaluation and appraisal of comprehensive plan.- |
95 | (1) The planning program shall be a continuous and ongoing |
96 | process. Each local government shall prepare adopt an evaluation |
97 | and appraisal report once every 7 years assessing the progress |
98 | in implementing the local government's comprehensive plan |
99 | unless: |
100 | (a) The local government has issued development orders for |
101 | residential units comprised of less than 10 percent of the local |
102 | government's residential development capacity at the time it |
103 | last submitted amendments based on an evaluation and appraisal |
104 | report pursuant to subsection (8); |
105 | (b) The local government has not adopted amendments to its |
106 | comprehensive plan that increase the local government's |
107 | residential development capacity by 10 percent or more since it |
108 | last submitted amendments based on an evaluation and appraisal |
109 | report pursuant to subsection (8); and |
110 | (c) Based on resident population estimates supplied by the |
111 | University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, |
112 | or the Executive Office of the Governor, the local government |
113 | demonstrates that its population has not increased by more than |
114 | 10 percent since it last submitted amendments based on an |
115 | evaluation and appraisal report pursuant to subsection (8). |
116 | (2) Furthermore, It is the intent of this section that: |
117 | (a) Adopted comprehensive plans be reviewed through such |
118 | evaluation process to respond to changes in state, regional, and |
119 | local policies on planning and growth management and changing |
120 | conditions and trends, to ensure effective intergovernmental |
121 | coordination, and to identify major issues regarding the |
122 | community's achievement of its goals. |
123 | (b) After completion of the initial evaluation and |
124 | appraisal report and any supporting plan amendments, each |
125 | subsequent evaluation and appraisal report must evaluate the |
126 | comprehensive plan in effect at the time of the initiation of |
127 | the evaluation and appraisal report process. |
128 | (c) Local governments identify the major issues, if |
129 | applicable, with input from state agencies, regional agencies, |
130 | adjacent local governments, and the public in the evaluation and |
131 | appraisal report process. It is also the intent of this section |
132 | to establish minimum requirements for information to ensure |
133 | predictability, certainty, and integrity in the growth |
134 | management process. The report is intended to serve as a summary |
135 | audit of the actions that a local government has undertaken and |
136 | identify changes that it may need to make. The report should be |
137 | based on the local government's analysis of major issues to |
138 | further the community's goals consistent with statewide minimum |
139 | standards. The report is not intended to require a comprehensive |
140 | rewrite of the elements within the local plan, unless a local |
141 | government chooses to do so. |
142 | (3)(2) The report shall present an evaluation and |
143 | assessment of the comprehensive plan and the local government is |
144 | encouraged to include shall contain appropriate statements to |
145 | update the comprehensive plan, including, but not limited to, |
146 | words, maps, illustrations, or other media, related to: |
147 | (a) Population growth and changes in land area, including |
148 | annexation, since the adoption of the original plan or the most |
149 | recent update amendments. |
150 | (b) The extent of vacant and developable land. |
151 | (c) The financial feasibility of implementing the |
152 | comprehensive plan and of providing needed infrastructure to |
153 | achieve and maintain adopted level-of-service standards and |
154 | sustain concurrency management systems through the capital |
155 | improvements element, as well as the ability to address |
156 | infrastructure backlogs and meet the demands of growth on public |
157 | services and facilities. |
158 | (d) The location of existing development in relation to |
159 | the location of development as anticipated in the original plan, |
160 | or in the plan as amended by the most recent evaluation and |
161 | appraisal report update amendments, such as within areas |
162 | designated for urban growth. |
163 | (e) An identification of the major issues for the |
164 | jurisdiction and, where pertinent, the potential social, |
165 | economic, and environmental impacts. |
166 | (f) Relevant changes to the state comprehensive plan, the |
167 | requirements of this part, the minimum criteria contained in |
168 | chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and the appropriate |
169 | strategic regional policy plan since the adoption of the |
170 | original plan or the most recent evaluation and appraisal report |
171 | update amendments. |
172 | (g) An assessment of whether the plan objectives within |
173 | each element, as they relate to major issues, have been |
174 | achieved. The report shall include, as appropriate, an |
175 | identification as to whether unforeseen or unanticipated changes |
176 | in circumstances have resulted in problems or opportunities with |
177 | respect to major issues identified in each element and the |
178 | social, economic, and environmental impacts of the issue. |
179 | (h) A brief assessment of successes and shortcomings |
180 | related to each element of the plan. |
181 | (i) The identification of any actions or corrective |
182 | measures, including whether plan amendments are anticipated to |
183 | address the major issues identified and analyzed in the report. |
184 | Such identification shall include, as appropriate, new |
185 | population projections, new revised planning timeframes, a |
186 | revised future conditions map or map series, an updated capital |
187 | improvements element, and any new and revised goals, objectives, |
188 | and policies for major issues identified within each element. |
189 | This paragraph does shall not require the submittal of the plan |
190 | amendments with the evaluation and appraisal report. |
191 | (j) A summary of the public participation program and |
192 | activities undertaken by the local government in preparing the |
193 | report. |
194 | (k) The coordination of the comprehensive plan with |
195 | existing public schools and those identified in the applicable |
196 | educational facilities plan adopted pursuant to s. 1013.35. The |
197 | assessment shall address, where relevant, the success or failure |
198 | of the coordination of the future land use map and associated |
199 | planned residential development with public schools and their |
200 | capacities, as well as the joint decisionmaking processes |
201 | engaged in by the local government and the school board in |
202 | regard to establishing appropriate population projections and |
203 | the planning and siting of public school facilities. For those |
204 | counties or municipalities that do not have a public schools |
205 | interlocal agreement or public school facilities element, the |
206 | assessment shall determine whether the local government |
207 | continues to meet the criteria of s. 163.3177(12). If the county |
208 | or municipality determines that it no longer meets the criteria, |
209 | it must adopt appropriate school concurrency goals, objectives, |
210 | and policies in its plan amendments pursuant to the requirements |
211 | of the public school facilities element, and enter into the |
212 | existing interlocal agreement required by ss. 163.3177(6)(h)2. |
213 | and 163.31777 in order to fully participate in the school |
214 | concurrency system. |
215 | (l) The extent to which the local government has been |
216 | successful in identifying alternative water supply projects and |
217 | traditional water supply projects, including conservation and |
218 | reuse, necessary to meet the water needs identified in s. |
219 | 373.709(2)(a) within the local government's jurisdiction. The |
220 | report must evaluate the degree to which the local government |
221 | has implemented the work plan for building public, private, and |
222 | regional water supply facilities, including development of |
223 | alternative water supplies, identified in the element as |
224 | necessary to serve existing and new development. |
225 | (m) If any of the jurisdiction of the local government is |
226 | located within the coastal high-hazard area, an evaluation of |
227 | whether any past reduction in land use density impairs the |
228 | property rights of current residents when redevelopment occurs, |
229 | including, but not limited to, redevelopment following a natural |
230 | disaster. The property rights of current residents shall be |
231 | balanced with public safety considerations. The local government |
232 | must identify strategies to address redevelopment feasibility |
233 | and the property rights of affected residents. These strategies |
234 | may include the authorization of redevelopment up to the actual |
235 | built density in existence on the property prior to the natural |
236 | disaster or redevelopment. |
237 | (n) An assessment of whether the criteria adopted pursuant |
238 | to s. 163.3177(6)(a) were successful in achieving compatibility |
239 | with military installations. |
240 | (o) The extent to which a concurrency exception area |
241 | designated pursuant to s. 163.3180(5), a concurrency management |
242 | area designated pursuant to s. 163.3180(7), or a multimodal |
243 | transportation district designated pursuant to s. 163.3180(15) |
244 | has achieved the purpose for which it was created and otherwise |
245 | complies with the provisions of s. 163.3180. |
246 | (p) An assessment of the extent to which changes are |
247 | needed to develop a common methodology for measuring impacts on |
248 | transportation facilities for the purpose of implementing its |
249 | concurrency management system in coordination with the |
250 | municipalities and counties, as appropriate pursuant to s. |
251 | 163.3180(10). |
252 | (4)(3) Voluntary scoping meetings may be conducted by each |
253 | local government or several local governments within the same |
254 | county that agree to meet together. Joint meetings among all |
255 | local governments in a county are encouraged. All scoping |
256 | meetings shall be completed at least 1 year prior to the |
257 | established adoption date of the report. The purpose of the |
258 | meetings shall be to distribute data and resources available to |
259 | assist in the preparation of the report, to provide input on |
260 | major issues in each community that should be addressed in the |
261 | report, and to advise on the extent of the effort for the |
262 | components of subsection (3) (2). If scoping meetings are held, |
263 | the local government is encouraged to shall invite each state |
264 | and regional reviewing agency, as well as adjacent and other |
265 | affected local governments. A preliminary list of new data and |
266 | major issues that have emerged since the adoption of the |
267 | original plan, or the most recent evaluation and appraisal |
268 | report-based update amendments, should be developed by state and |
269 | regional entities and involved local governments for |
270 | distribution at the scoping meeting. For purposes of this |
271 | subsection, a "scoping meeting" is a meeting conducted to |
272 | determine the scope of review of the evaluation and appraisal |
273 | report by parties to which the report relates. |
274 | (5)(4) The local planning agency shall prepare the |
275 | evaluation and appraisal report and shall make recommendations |
276 | to the governing body regarding adoption of the proposed report. |
277 | The local planning agency shall prepare the report in conformity |
278 | with its public participation procedures adopted as required by |
279 | s. 163.3181. To further public participation in the evaluation |
280 | and appraisal process During the preparation of the proposed |
281 | report and prior to making any recommendation to the governing |
282 | body, the local planning agency shall hold at least one public |
283 | hearing, with public notice, on the proposed report. At a |
284 | minimum, the format and content of the proposed report shall |
285 | include a table of contents; numbered pages; element headings; |
286 | section headings within elements; a list of included tables, |
287 | maps, and figures; a title and sources for all included tables; |
288 | a preparation date; and the name of the preparer. Where |
289 | applicable, maps shall include major natural and artificial |
290 | geographic features; city, county, and state lines; and a legend |
291 | indicating a north arrow, map scale, and the date. |
292 | (5) Ninety days prior to the scheduled adoption date, the |
293 | local government may provide a proposed evaluation and appraisal |
294 | report to the state land planning agency and distribute copies |
295 | to state and regional commenting agencies as prescribed by rule, |
296 | adjacent jurisdictions, and interested citizens for review. All |
297 | review comments, including comments by the state land planning |
298 | agency, shall be transmitted to the local government and state |
299 | land planning agency within 30 days after receipt of the |
300 | proposed report. |
301 | (6) The governing body, after considering the review |
302 | comments and recommended changes, if any, shall adopt the |
303 | evaluation and appraisal report by resolution or ordinance at a |
304 | public hearing with public notice. The governing body shall |
305 | adopt the report in conformity with its public participation |
306 | procedures adopted as required by s. 163.3181. The local |
307 | government shall submit to the state land planning agency three |
308 | copies of the report, a transmittal letter indicating the dates |
309 | of public hearings, and a copy of the adoption resolution or |
310 | ordinance. The local government shall provide a copy of the |
311 | report to the reviewing agencies which provided comments for the |
312 | proposed report, or to all the reviewing agencies if a proposed |
313 | report was not provided pursuant to subsection (5), including |
314 | the adjacent local governments. Within 60 days after receipt, |
315 | the state land planning agency shall review the adopted report |
316 | and make a preliminary sufficiency determination that shall be |
317 | forwarded by the agency to the local government for its |
318 | consideration. The state land planning agency shall issue a |
319 | final sufficiency determination within 90 days after receipt of |
320 | the adopted evaluation and appraisal report. |
321 | (6)(7) The intent of the evaluation and appraisal process |
322 | is the preparation of a plan update that clearly and concisely |
323 | achieves the purpose of this section. The evaluation and |
324 | appraisal report shall be submitted as data and analysis in |
325 | support of amendments based on the report. Toward this end, the |
326 | sufficiency review of the state land planning agency shall |
327 | concentrate on whether the evaluation and appraisal report |
328 | sufficiently fulfills the components of subsection (2). If the |
329 | state land planning agency determines that the report is |
330 | insufficient, the governing body shall adopt a revision of the |
331 | report and submit the revised report for review pursuant to |
332 | subsection (6). |
333 | (8) The state land planning agency may delegate the review |
334 | of evaluation and appraisal reports, including all state land |
335 | planning agency duties under subsections (4)-(7), to the |
336 | appropriate regional planning council. When the review has been |
337 | delegated to a regional planning council, any local government |
338 | in the region may elect to have its report reviewed by the |
339 | regional planning council rather than the state land planning |
340 | agency. The state land planning agency shall by agreement |
341 | provide for uniform and adequate review of reports and shall |
342 | retain oversight for any delegation of review to a regional |
343 | planning council. |
344 | (7)(9) The state land planning agency may establish a |
345 | phased schedule for adoption of amendments based on evaluation |
346 | and appraisal reports. The schedule shall provide each local |
347 | government at least 7 years from plan adoption or last |
348 | established adoption date for amendments based on an evaluation |
349 | and appraisal a report and shall allot approximately one-seventh |
350 | of the reports to any 1 year. In order to allow the |
351 | municipalities to use data and analyses gathered by the |
352 | counties, the state land planning agency shall schedule |
353 | municipal report adoption dates for amendments to a municipal |
354 | plan which are based on an evaluation and appraisal report |
355 | between 1 year and 18 months later than the report adoption date |
356 | for amendments to a county plan which are based on an evaluation |
357 | and appraisal report of the county in which those municipalities |
358 | are located. A local government may adopt its report no earlier |
359 | than 90 days prior to the established adoption date. Small |
360 | municipalities which were scheduled by chapter 9J-33, Florida |
361 | Administrative Code, to adopt their evaluation and appraisal |
362 | report after February 2, 1999, shall be rescheduled to adopt |
363 | their report together with the other municipalities in their |
364 | county as provided in this subsection. |
365 | (8)(10) The governing body shall amend its comprehensive |
366 | plan based on the recommendations in the report and shall update |
367 | the comprehensive plan based on the components of subsection (3) |
368 | (2), pursuant to the provisions of ss. 163.3184, 163.3187, and |
369 | 163.3189. Amendments to update a comprehensive plan based on the |
370 | evaluation and appraisal report shall be adopted during a single |
371 | amendment cycle within the time period established by the state |
372 | land planning agency's schedule authorized in subsection (7) 18 |
373 | months after the report is determined to be sufficient by the |
374 | state land planning agency, except that the state land planning |
375 | agency may grant an extension for adoption of a portion of such |
376 | amendments. The state land planning agency may grant a 6-month |
377 | extension for the adoption of such amendments if the request is |
378 | justified by good and sufficient cause as determined by the |
379 | agency. An additional extension may also be granted if the |
380 | request will result in greater coordination between |
381 | transportation and land use, for the purposes of improving |
382 | Florida's transportation system, as determined by the agency in |
383 | coordination with the Metropolitan Planning Organization |
384 | program. Except for local governments exempted from preparing |
385 | evaluation and appraisal reports pursuant to subsection (1), |
386 | beginning July 1, 2006, failure to timely adopt and transmit |
387 | update amendments to the comprehensive plan based on the |
388 | evaluation and appraisal report shall result in a local |
389 | government being prohibited from adopting amendments to the |
390 | comprehensive plan until the amendments based on the evaluation |
391 | and appraisal report update amendments have been adopted and |
392 | transmitted to the state land planning agency. The prohibition |
393 | on plan amendments shall commence when such the update |
394 | amendments to the comprehensive plan are past due. The |
395 | comprehensive plan as amended shall be in compliance as defined |
396 | in s. 163.3184(1)(b). Within 6 months after the effective date |
397 | of such the update amendments to the comprehensive plan, the |
398 | local government shall provide to the state land planning agency |
399 | and to all agencies designated by rule a complete copy of the |
400 | updated comprehensive plan. |
401 | (9)(11) The Administration Commission may impose the |
402 | sanctions provided by s. 163.3184(11) against any local |
403 | government that fails to adopt and submit a report, or that |
404 | fails to implement its report through timely and sufficient |
405 | amendments to its local plan, except for reasons of excusable |
406 | delay or valid planning reasons agreed to by the state land |
407 | planning agency or found present by the Administration |
408 | Commission. Sanctions for untimely or insufficient plan |
409 | amendments shall be prospective only and shall begin after a |
410 | final order has been issued by the Administration Commission and |
411 | a reasonable period of time has been allowed for the local |
412 | government to comply with an adverse determination by the |
413 | Administration Commission through adoption of plan amendments |
414 | that are in compliance. The state land planning agency may |
415 | initiate, and an affected person may intervene in, such a |
416 | proceeding by filing a petition with the Division of |
417 | Administrative Hearings, which shall appoint an administrative |
418 | law judge and conduct a hearing pursuant to ss. 120.569 and |
419 | 120.57(1) and shall submit a recommended order to the |
420 | Administration Commission. The affected local government shall |
421 | be a party to any such proceeding. The commission may implement |
422 | this subsection by rule. |
423 | (10)(12) The state land planning agency may shall not |
424 | adopt rules to implement this section, other than procedural |
425 | rules. |
426 | (13) The state land planning agency shall regularly review |
427 | the evaluation and appraisal report process and submit a report |
428 | to the Governor, the Administration Commission, the Speaker of |
429 | the House of Representatives, the President of the Senate, and |
430 | the respective community affairs committees of the Senate and |
431 | the House of Representatives. The first report shall be |
432 | submitted by December 31, 2004, and subsequent reports shall be |
433 | submitted every 5 years thereafter. At least 9 months before the |
434 | due date of each report, the Secretary of Community Affairs |
435 | shall appoint a technical committee of at least 15 members to |
436 | assist in the preparation of the report. The membership of the |
437 | technical committee shall consist of representatives of local |
438 | governments, regional planning councils, the private sector, and |
439 | environmental organizations. The report shall assess the |
440 | effectiveness of the evaluation and appraisal report process. |
441 | (11)(14) The requirement of subsection (8) (10) |
442 | prohibiting a local government from adopting amendments to the |
443 | local comprehensive plan until the amendments based on the |
444 | evaluation and appraisal report update amendments have been |
445 | adopted and transmitted to the state land planning agency does |
446 | not apply to a plan amendment proposed for adoption by the |
447 | appropriate local government as defined in s. 163.3178(2)(k) in |
448 | order to integrate a port comprehensive master plan with the |
449 | coastal management element of the local comprehensive plan as |
450 | required by s. 163.3178(2)(k) if the port comprehensive master |
451 | plan or the proposed plan amendment does not cause or contribute |
452 | to the failure of the local government to comply with the |
453 | requirements of this section the evaluation and appraisal |
454 | report. |
455 | Section 6. Section 163.3245, Florida Statutes, is amended |
456 | to read: |
457 | 163.3245 Optional Sector plans.- |
458 | (1) In recognition of the benefits of conceptual long- |
459 | range planning, for the buildout of an area, and detailed |
460 | planning for specific areas, as a demonstration project, the |
461 | requirements of s. 380.06 may be addressed as identified by this |
462 | section for up to five local governments or combinations of |
463 | local governments may which adopt into their the comprehensive |
464 | plans a plan an optional sector plan in accordance with this |
465 | section. This section is intended to promote and encourage long- |
466 | term planning for conservation, development, and agriculture on |
467 | a landscape scale; to further the intent of s. 163.3177(11), |
468 | which supports innovative and flexible planning and development |
469 | strategies, and the purposes of this part, and part I of chapter |
470 | 380; to facilitate protection of regionally significant water |
471 | courses and wildlife corridors;, and to avoid duplication of |
472 | effort in terms of the level of data and analysis required for a |
473 | development of regional impact, while ensuring the adequate |
474 | mitigation of impacts to applicable regional resources and |
475 | facilities, including those within the jurisdiction of other |
476 | local governments, as would otherwise be provided. Optional |
477 | Sector plans are intended for substantial geographic areas that |
478 | include including at least 15,000 5,000 acres of one or more |
479 | local governmental jurisdictions and are to emphasize urban form |
480 | and protection of regionally significant resources and public |
481 | facilities. The state land planning agency may approve optional |
482 | sector plans of less than 5,000 acres based on local |
483 | circumstances if it is determined that the plan would further |
484 | the purposes of this part and part I of chapter 380. Preparation |
485 | of an optional sector plan is authorized by agreement between |
486 | the state land planning agency and the applicable local |
487 | governments under s. 163.3171(4). An optional sector plan may be |
488 | adopted through one or more comprehensive plan amendments under |
489 | s. 163.3184. A However, an optional sector plan may not be |
490 | adopted authorized in an area of critical state concern. |
491 | (2) The state land planning agency may enter into an |
492 | agreement to authorize preparation of an optional sector plan |
493 | upon the request of one or more local governments based on |
494 | consideration of problems and opportunities presented by |
495 | existing development trends; the effectiveness of current |
496 | comprehensive plan provisions; the potential to further the |
497 | state comprehensive plan, applicable strategic regional policy |
498 | plans, this part, and part I of chapter 380; and those factors |
499 | identified by s. 163.3177(10)(i). Upon the request of a local |
500 | government with jurisdiction, the applicable regional planning |
501 | council shall conduct a scoping meeting with affected local |
502 | governments and those agencies identified in s. 163.3184(4) |
503 | before preparation of the sector plan execution of the agreement |
504 | authorized by this section. The purpose of this meeting is to |
505 | assist the state land planning agency and the local government |
506 | in the identification of the relevant planning issues to be |
507 | addressed and the data and resources available to assist in the |
508 | preparation of the sector subsequent plan amendments. If a |
509 | scoping meeting is held, the regional planning council shall |
510 | make written recommendations to the state land planning agency |
511 | and affected local governments on the issues requested by the |
512 | local government, including whether a sustainable sector plan |
513 | would be appropriate. The scoping meeting must be noticed and |
514 | open to the public. If the entire planning area proposed for the |
515 | sector plan is within the jurisdiction of two or more local |
516 | governments, some or all of them may enter into a joint planning |
517 | agreement pursuant to s. 163.3171 with respect to agreement must |
518 | define the geographic area to be subject to the sector plan, the |
519 | planning issues that will be emphasized, procedures requirements |
520 | for intergovernmental coordination to address |
521 | extrajurisdictional impacts, supporting application materials |
522 | including data and analysis, and procedures for public |
523 | participation, or any other issues agreed to by the local |
524 | governments entering into the agreement. An agreement may |
525 | address previously adopted sector plans that are consistent with |
526 | the standards in this section. Before executing an agreement |
527 | under this subsection, the local government shall hold a duly |
528 | noticed public workshop to review and explain to the public the |
529 | optional sector planning process and the terms and conditions of |
530 | the proposed agreement. The local government shall hold a duly |
531 | noticed public hearing to execute the agreement. All meetings |
532 | between the department and the local government must be open to |
533 | the public. |
534 | (3) Optional Sector planning encompasses two levels: |
535 | adoption pursuant to under s. 163.3184 of a conceptual long-term |
536 | master plan for the entire planning area as part of the |
537 | comprehensive plan and adoption by local development order of |
538 | two or more buildout overlay to the comprehensive plan, having |
539 | no immediate effect on the issuance of development orders or the |
540 | applicability of s. 380.06, and adoption under s. 163.3184 of |
541 | detailed specific area plans that implement the conceptual long- |
542 | term master plan buildout overlay and authorize issuance of |
543 | development orders, and within which s. 380.06 is waived. Until |
544 | such time as a detailed specific area plan is adopted, the |
545 | underlying future land use designations apply. |
546 | (a) In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, |
547 | a long-term master plan pursuant to this section conceptual |
548 | long-term buildout overlay must include maps, illustrations, and |
549 | text supported by data and analysis to address the following: |
550 | 1. A long-range conceptual framework map that, at a |
551 | minimum, generally depicts identifies anticipated areas of |
552 | urban, agricultural, rural, and conservation land use; |
553 | identifies allowed uses in various parts of the planning area; |
554 | specifies maximum and minimum densities and intensities of use; |
555 | and provides the conceptual framework for the development |
556 | pattern in developed areas with graphic illustrations based on a |
557 | hierarchy of places and functional place-making components. |
558 | 2. A general identification of the water supplies needed |
559 | and available sources of water, including water resource |
560 | development and water supply development projects, and water |
561 | conservation measures needed to meet the projected demand of the |
562 | future land uses in the long-term master plan. |
563 | 3. A general identification of the transportation |
564 | facilities to serve the future land uses in the long-term master |
565 | plan, including guidelines to be used to establish each modal |
566 | component intended to optimize mobility. |
567 | 4. A general identification of other regionally |
568 | significant public facilities consistent with chapter 9J-2, |
569 | Florida Administrative Code, irrespective of local governmental |
570 | jurisdiction necessary to support buildout of the anticipated |
571 | future land uses, which may include central utilities provided |
572 | on site within the planning area, and policies setting forth the |
573 | procedures to be used to mitigate the impacts of future land |
574 | uses on public facilities. |
575 | 5.3. A general identification of regionally significant |
576 | natural resources within the planning area and policies setting |
577 | forth the procedures for protection or conservation of specific |
578 | resources consistent with the overall conservation and |
579 | development strategy for the planning area consistent with |
580 | chapter 9J-2, Florida Administrative Code. |
581 | 6.4. General principles and guidelines addressing that |
582 | address the urban form and the interrelationships of anticipated |
583 | future land uses; providing for the protection and, as |
584 | appropriate, restoration and management of lands identified for |
585 | permanent preservation; and a discussion, at the applicant's |
586 | option, of the extent, if any, to which the plan will address |
587 | restoring key ecosystems, achieving a cleaner more clean, more |
588 | healthy environment;, limiting urban sprawl; providing a range |
589 | of housing types;, protecting wildlife and natural areas;, |
590 | advancing the efficient use of land and other resources;, and |
591 | creating quality communities of a design that promotes travel by |
592 | multiple transportation modes; and enhancing the prospects for |
593 | the creation of jobs. |
594 | 7.5. Identification of general procedures and policies to |
595 | facilitate ensure intergovernmental coordination to address |
596 | extrajurisdictional impacts from the future land uses long-range |
597 | conceptual framework map. |
598 |
|
599 | A long-term master plan adopted pursuant to this section shall |
600 | be based on a planning period longer than the generally |
601 | applicable planning period of the local comprehensive plan, |
602 | shall specify the projected population within the planning area |
603 | during the chosen planning period, and may include a phasing or |
604 | staging schedule that allocates a portion of the local |
605 | government's future growth to the planning area through the |
606 | planning period. A long-term master plan adopted pursuant to |
607 | this section does not have to be based on projected population |
608 | growth or any other need. |
609 | (b) In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, |
610 | including those in paragraph (a), the detailed specific area |
611 | plans must be consistent with the long-term master plan and must |
612 | include conditions and commitments that provide for: |
613 | 1. Development or conservation of an area of adequate size |
614 | to accommodate a level of development which achieves a |
615 | functional relationship between a full range of land uses within |
616 | the area and to encompass at least 1,000 acres consistent with |
617 | the long-term master plan. The local government state land |
618 | planning agency may approve detailed specific area plans of less |
619 | than 1,000 acres based on local circumstances if it is |
620 | determined that the detailed specific area plan furthers the |
621 | purposes of this part and part I of chapter 380. |
622 | 2. Detailed identification and analysis of the maximum and |
623 | minimum densities and intensities of use and the distribution, |
624 | extent, and location of future land uses. |
625 | 3. Detailed identification of water resource development |
626 | and water supply development projects and related infrastructure |
627 | and water conservation measures to address water needs of |
628 | development in the detailed specific area plan. |
629 | 4. Detailed identification of the transportation |
630 | facilities to serve the future land uses in the detailed |
631 | specific area plan. |
632 | 5.3. Detailed identification of other regionally |
633 | significant public facilities, including public facilities |
634 | outside the jurisdiction of the host local government, |
635 | anticipated impacts of future land uses on those facilities, and |
636 | required improvements consistent with the long-term master plan |
637 | chapter 9J-2, Florida Administrative Code. |
638 | 6.4. Public facilities necessary to serve development in |
639 | the detailed specific area plan for the short term, including |
640 | developer contributions in a financially feasible 5-year capital |
641 | improvement schedule of the affected local government. |
642 | 7.5. Detailed analysis and identification of specific |
643 | measures to ensure assure the protection or conservation of |
644 | lands identified in the long-term master plan to be permanently |
645 | preserved and, as appropriate, restored or managed of regionally |
646 | significant natural resources and other important resources both |
647 | within and outside the host jurisdiction, including those |
648 | regionally significant resources identified in chapter 9J-2, |
649 | Florida Administrative Code. |
650 | 8.6. Detailed principles and guidelines addressing that |
651 | address the urban form and the interrelationships of anticipated |
652 | future land uses; and a discussion, at the applicant's option, |
653 | of the extent, if any, to which the plan will address restoring |
654 | key ecosystems, achieving a cleaner more clean, more healthy |
655 | environment;, limiting urban sprawl; providing a range of |
656 | housing types;, protecting wildlife and natural areas;, |
657 | advancing the efficient use of land and other resources;, and |
658 | creating quality communities of a design that promotes travel by |
659 | multiple transportation modes; and enhancing the prospects for |
660 | the creation of jobs. |
661 | 9.7. Identification of specific procedures to facilitate |
662 | ensure intergovernmental coordination to address |
663 | extrajurisdictional impacts from of the detailed specific area |
664 | plan. |
665 |
|
666 | A detailed specific area plan adopted by local development order |
667 | pursuant to this section may be based on a planning period |
668 | longer than the generally applicable planning period of the |
669 | local comprehensive plan and shall specify the projected |
670 | population within the specific planning area during the chosen |
671 | planning period. A detailed specific area plan adopted pursuant |
672 | to this section does not have to be based on projected |
673 | population growth or any other need. |
674 | (c) In its review of a long-term master plan, the state |
675 | land planning agency shall consult with the Department of |
676 | Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Department of |
677 | Environmental Protection, the Florida Fish and Wildlife |
678 | Conservation Commission, and the applicable water management |
679 | district regarding the design of areas for protection and |
680 | conservation of regionally significant natural resources and for |
681 | the protection and, as appropriate, restoration and management |
682 | of lands identified for permanent preservation. |
683 | (d) The state land planning agency may initiate a civil |
684 | action pursuant to s. 163.3215 with respect to a detailed |
685 | specific area plan which is not consistent with a long-term |
686 | master plan adopted pursuant to this section. For purposes of |
687 | such a proceeding, the state land planning agency shall be |
688 | deemed an aggrieved and adversely affected party. Regardless of |
689 | whether the local government has adopted an ordinance that |
690 | establishes a local process which meets the requirements of s. |
691 | 163.3215(4), judicial review of a detailed specific area plan |
692 | initiated by the state land planning agency shall be de novo |
693 | pursuant to s. 163.3215(3) and not by petition for writ of |
694 | certiorari pursuant to s. 163.3215(4). Any other aggrieved or |
695 | adversely affected party shall be subject to s. 163.3215 in all |
696 | respects when initiating a consistency challenge to a detailed |
697 | specific area plan. |
698 | (e)(c) This subsection does may not be construed to |
699 | prevent preparation and approval of the optional sector plan and |
700 | detailed specific area plan concurrently or in the same |
701 | submission. |
702 | (4) Upon the long-term master plan becoming legally |
703 | effective: |
704 | (a) Any long-range transportation plan developed by a |
705 | metropolitan planning organization pursuant to s. 339.175(7) |
706 | must be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible, with the |
707 | long-term master plan, including, but not limited to, the |
708 | projected population, the approved uses and densities and |
709 | intensities of use and their distribution within the planning |
710 | area, and the transportation facilities identified in adopted |
711 | plans pursuant to subparagraphs (3)(a)3. and (3)(b)4. |
712 | (b) The water supply needs, water sources, and water |
713 | resource development and water supply development projects |
714 | identified in adopted plans pursuant to subparagraphs (3)(a)2. |
715 | and (3)(b)3. shall be incorporated into the applicable district |
716 | and regional water supply plans adopted in accordance with ss. |
717 | 373.036 and 373.709. Accordingly, and notwithstanding the permit |
718 | durations stated in s. 373.236, an applicant may request and the |
719 | applicable district may issue consumptive use permits for |
720 | durations commensurate with the long-term master plan. The |
721 | permitting criteria in s. 373.223 shall be applied based on the |
722 | projected population and the approved densities and intensities |
723 | of use and their distribution in the long-term master plan. |
724 | (c) A development subject to s. 380.06 may be granted |
725 | development approval pursuant to s. 380.06 without submission |
726 | and approval of a detailed specific area plan pursuant to this |
727 | section and thereafter shall be subject to all requirements of |
728 | s. 380.06 in lieu of the requirements of this section. The host |
729 | local government shall submit a monitoring report to the state |
730 | land planning agency and applicable regional planning council on |
731 | an annual basis after adoption of a detailed specific area plan. |
732 | The annual monitoring report must provide summarized information |
733 | on development orders issued, development that has occurred, |
734 | public facility improvements made, and public facility |
735 | improvements anticipated over the upcoming 5 years. |
736 | (5) When a plan amendment adopting a detailed specific |
737 | area plan has become effective for a portion of the planning |
738 | area governed by a long-term master plan adopted pursuant to |
739 | this section under ss. 163.3184 and 163.3189(2), the provisions |
740 | of s. 380.06 do not apply to development within the geographic |
741 | area of the detailed specific area plan. However, any |
742 | development-of-regional-impact development order that is vested |
743 | from the detailed specific area plan may be enforced pursuant to |
744 | under s. 380.11. |
745 | (a) The local government adopting the detailed specific |
746 | area plan is primarily responsible for monitoring and enforcing |
747 | the detailed specific area plan. Local governments may shall not |
748 | issue any permits or approvals or provide any extensions of |
749 | services to development that are not consistent with the |
750 | detailed specific sector area plan. |
751 | (b) If the state land planning agency has reason to |
752 | believe that a violation of any detailed specific area plan, or |
753 | of any agreement entered into under this section, has occurred |
754 | or is about to occur, it may institute an administrative or |
755 | judicial proceeding to prevent, abate, or control the conditions |
756 | or activity creating the violation, using the procedures in s. |
757 | 380.11. |
758 | (c) In instituting an administrative or judicial |
759 | proceeding involving a an optional sector plan or detailed |
760 | specific area plan, including a proceeding pursuant to paragraph |
761 | (b), the complaining party must shall comply with the |
762 | requirements of s. 163.3215(4), (5), (6), and (7), except as |
763 | provided by paragraph (3)(d). |
764 | (d) The detailed specific area plan shall establish a |
765 | buildout date prior to which the approved development is not |
766 | subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or intensity |
767 | reduction unless the local government demonstrates that |
768 | implementation of the plan is not continuing in good faith based |
769 | on standards established by plan policy, that substantial |
770 | changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the |
771 | detailed specific area plan have occurred, that the detailed |
772 | specific area plan was based on substantially inaccurate |
773 | information provided by the applicant, or that the change is |
774 | clearly essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. |
775 | (6) Concurrent with or subsequent to review and adoption |
776 | of a long-term master plan pursuant to paragraph (3)(a), an |
777 | applicant may apply for master development approval pursuant to |
778 | s. 380.06(21) for the entire planning area in order to establish |
779 | a buildout date prior to which the approved uses and densities |
780 | and intensities of use of the master plan are not subject to |
781 | downzoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction |
782 | unless the local government demonstrates that implementation of |
783 | the master plan is not continuing in good faith based on |
784 | standards established by plan policy, that substantial changes |
785 | in the conditions underlying the approval of the master plan |
786 | have occurred, that the master plan was based on substantially |
787 | inaccurate information provided by the applicant, or that change |
788 | is clearly essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. |
789 | Review of the application for master development approval shall |
790 | be at a level of detail appropriate for the long-term and |
791 | conceptual nature of the long-term master plan and, to the |
792 | maximum extent possible, may only consider information provided |
793 | in the application for a long-term master plan. Notwithstanding |
794 | any provision of s. 380.06 to the contrary, an increment of |
795 | development in such an approved master development plan must be |
796 | approved by a detailed specific area plan pursuant to paragraph |
797 | (3)(b) and is exempt from review pursuant to s. 380.06. |
798 | Beginning December 1, 1999, and each year thereafter, the |
799 | department shall provide a status report to the Legislative |
800 | Committee on Intergovernmental Relations regarding each optional |
801 | sector plan authorized under this section. |
802 | (7) A developer within an area subject to a long-term |
803 | master plan that meets the requirements of paragraph (3)(a) and |
804 | subsection (6) or a detailed specific area plan that meets the |
805 | requirements of paragraph (3)(b) may enter into a development |
806 | agreement with a local government pursuant to ss. 163.3220- |
807 | 163.3243. The duration of such a development agreement may be |
808 | through the planning period of the long-term master plan or the |
809 | detailed specific area plan, as the case may be, notwithstanding |
810 | the limit on the duration of a development agreement pursuant to |
811 | s. 163.3229. |
812 | (8) Any owner of property within the planning area of a |
813 | proposed long-term master plan may withdraw the owner's consent |
814 | to the master plan at any time prior its adoption by the local |
815 | government, and the local government shall exclude such parcels |
816 | from the adopted master plan. Thereafter, the long-term master |
817 | plan, any detailed specific area plan, and the exemption from |
818 | development-of-regional-impact review under this section does |
819 | not apply to the subject parcels. After adoption of a long-term |
820 | master plan, an owner may withdraw the owner's property from the |
821 | plan only with the approval of the local government by means of |
822 | a plan amendment. |
823 | (9) The adoption of a long-term master plan or a detailed |
824 | specific area plan pursuant to this section does not limit the |
825 | right to continue existing agricultural or silvicultural uses or |
826 | other natural resource-based operations or to establish similar |
827 | new uses that are consistent with the plans approved pursuant to |
828 | this section. |
829 | (10) Notwithstanding s. 380.06, part II of chapter 163, or |
830 | any planning agreement or plan policy, a landowner or developer |
831 | who has received approval of a master development of regional |
832 | impact development order pursuant to s. 380.06(21) may apply to |
833 | implement this order by filing one or more applications to |
834 | approve a detailed specific area plan pursuant to paragraph |
835 | (3)(b). |
836 | (11) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a |
837 | detailed specific area plan to implement a conceptual long-term |
838 | buildout overlay of less than 15,000 acres, which was adopted by |
839 | a local government and found in compliance before July 1, 2011, |
840 | is subject to this section. |
841 | (12)(7) This section may not be construed to abrogate the |
842 | rights of any person under this chapter. |
843 | Section 7. Paragraph (b) of subsection (9) of section |
844 | 163.3246, Florida Statutes, is amended to read: |
845 | 163.3246 Local government comprehensive planning |
846 | certification program.- |
847 | (9) |
848 | (b) Plan amendments that change the boundaries of the |
849 | certification area; propose a rural land stewardship area |
850 | pursuant to s. 163.3177(11)(d); propose a an optional sector |
851 | plan pursuant to s. 163.3245; propose a school facilities |
852 | element; update a comprehensive plan based on an evaluation and |
853 | appraisal report; impact lands outside the certification |
854 | boundary; implement new statutory requirements that require |
855 | specific comprehensive plan amendments; or increase hurricane |
856 | evacuation times or the need for shelter capacity on lands |
857 | within the coastal high-hazard area shall be reviewed pursuant |
858 | to ss. 163.3184 and 163.3187. |
859 | Section 8. Section 163.32465, Florida Statutes, is amended |
860 | to read: |
861 | 163.32465 State review of local comprehensive plans in |
862 | urban areas.- |
863 | (1) LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS.- |
864 | (a) The Legislature finds that comprehensive planning |
865 | programs have matured throughout the state and therefore local |
866 | governments in this state have a wide diversity of resources, |
867 | conditions, abilities, and needs. The Legislature also finds |
868 | that the needs and resources of urban areas are different from |
869 | those of rural areas and that different planning and growth |
870 | management approaches, strategies, and techniques are required |
871 | in urban areas. The state role in overseeing growth management |
872 | should reflect this diversity and should vary based on local |
873 | government conditions, capabilities, needs, and extent of |
874 | development. Thus, the Legislature recognizes and finds that |
875 | reduced state oversight of local comprehensive planning is |
876 | justified for some local governments in urban areas. |
877 | (b) The Legislature finds and declares that this state's |
878 | local governments urban areas require a reduced level of state |
879 | oversight because of their high degree of urbanization and the |
880 | planning capabilities and resources of many of their local |
881 | governments. An alternative state review process that is |
882 | adequate to protect issues of regional or statewide importance |
883 | should be created for appropriate local governments in these |
884 | areas. Further, the Legislature finds that development, |
885 | including urban infill and redevelopment, should be encouraged |
886 | in these urban areas. Accordingly, the Legislature finds that an |
887 | alternative process provided by this section for amending local |
888 | comprehensive plans is in these areas should be established with |
889 | the an objective of streamlining the process and recognizing |
890 | local responsibility and accountability. |
891 | (c) The Legislature finds a pilot program will be |
892 | beneficial in evaluating an alternative, expedited plan |
893 | amendment adoption and review process. Pilot local governments |
894 | shall represent highly developed counties and the municipalities |
895 | within these counties and highly populated municipalities. |
896 | (2) APPLICABILITY ALTERNATIVE STATE REVIEW PROCESS PILOT |
897 | PROGRAM.-The process for amending a comprehensive plan described |
898 | in this section shall be applicable statewide. On a case-by-case |
899 | basis, a local government, by majority vote, may elect to follow |
900 | the procedures set forth in s. 163.3184 for processing a |
901 | comprehensive plan amendment in lieu of using the procedures set |
902 | forth in this section. Pinellas and Broward Counties, and the |
903 | municipalities within these counties, and Jacksonville, Miami, |
904 | Tampa, and Hialeah shall follow an alternative state review |
905 | process provided in this section. Municipalities within the |
906 | pilot counties may elect, by super majority vote of the |
907 | governing body, not to participate in the pilot program. In |
908 | addition to the pilot program jurisdictions, any local |
909 | government may use the alternative state review process to |
910 | designate an urban service area as defined in s. 163.3164(29) in |
911 | its comprehensive plan. |
912 | (3) PROCESS FOR ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS |
913 | UNDER THE PILOT PROGRAM.- |
914 | (a) Plan amendments adopted by local governments are |
915 | subject to the pilot program jurisdictions shall follow the |
916 | alternate, expedited process in subsections (4) and (5), except |
917 | as follows: as set forth in paragraphs (b)-(e) of this |
918 | subsection. |
919 | (a)(b) Amendments that qualify as small-scale development |
920 | amendments may continue to be adopted by the pilot program |
921 | jurisdictions pursuant to s. 163.3187(1)(c) and (3). |
922 | (b)(c) Plan amendments that propose a rural land |
923 | stewardship area pursuant to s. 163.3177(11)(d); propose a an |
924 | optional sector plan; update a comprehensive plan based on an |
925 | evaluation and appraisal report; or implement new statutory |
926 | requirements; plan amendment packages for which local |
927 | governments request a more thorough review pursuant to |
928 | subsection (2); or new plans for newly incorporated |
929 | municipalities are subject to state review as set forth in s. |
930 | 163.3184. |
931 | (c)(d) Local governments Pilot program jurisdictions shall |
932 | be subject to the frequency and timing requirements for plan |
933 | amendments set forth in ss. 163.3187 and 163.3191, except where |
934 | otherwise stated in this section. |
935 | (d)(e) The mediation and expedited hearing provisions in |
936 | s. 163.3189(3) apply to all plan amendments adopted pursuant to |
937 | this section by the pilot program jurisdictions. |
938 | (4) INITIAL HEARING ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR |
939 | PILOT PROGRAM.- |
940 | (a) The local government shall hold its first public |
941 | hearing on a comprehensive plan amendment on a weekday at least |
942 | 7 days after the day the first advertisement is published |
943 | pursuant to the requirements of chapter 125 or chapter 166. Upon |
944 | an affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the members |
945 | of the governing body present at the hearing, the local |
946 | government shall immediately transmit the amendment or |
947 | amendments and appropriate supporting data and analyses to the |
948 | state land planning agency; the appropriate regional planning |
949 | council and water management district; the Department of |
950 | Environmental Protection; the Department of State; the |
951 | Department of Transportation; in the case of municipal plans, to |
952 | the appropriate county; the Fish and Wildlife Conservation |
953 | Commission; the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services; |
954 | and in the case of amendments that include or impact the public |
955 | school facilities element, the Department Office of Educational |
956 | Facilities of the Commissioner of Education. The local governing |
957 | body shall also transmit a copy of the amendments and supporting |
958 | data and analyses to any other local government or governmental |
959 | agency that has filed a written request with the governing body. |
960 | (b) The agencies and local governments specified in |
961 | paragraph (a) may provide comments regarding the amendment or |
962 | amendments to the local government. The regional planning |
963 | council review and comment shall be limited to effects on |
964 | regional resources or facilities identified in the strategic |
965 | regional policy plan and extrajurisdictional impacts that would |
966 | be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan of the affected |
967 | local government. A regional planning council may shall not |
968 | review and comment on a proposed comprehensive plan amendment |
969 | prepared by such council unless the plan amendment has been |
970 | changed by the local government subsequent to the preparation of |
971 | the plan amendment by the regional planning council. County |
972 | comments on municipal comprehensive plan amendments shall be |
973 | primarily in the context of the relationship and effect of the |
974 | proposed plan amendments on the county plan. Municipal comments |
975 | on county plan amendments shall be primarily in the context of |
976 | the relationship and effect of the amendments on the municipal |
977 | plan. State agency comments may include technical guidance on |
978 | issues of agency jurisdiction identified in this paragraph as it |
979 | relates to the requirements of this part. Such comments shall |
980 | clearly identify issues that, if not resolved, may result in an |
981 | agency challenge to the plan amendment. State agencies shall For |
982 | the purposes of this pilot program, agencies are encouraged to |
983 | focus potential challenges on issues of regional or statewide |
984 | importance. Agencies and local governments must transmit their |
985 | comments to the affected local government such that they are |
986 | received by the local government not later than 30 thirty days |
987 | after from the date on which the agency or government received |
988 | the amendment or amendments. With respect to comments to the |
989 | state land planning agency regarding plan amendments: |
990 | 1. The appropriate water management district shall limit |
991 | its comments to the subjects of wetlands, well fields, and |
992 | consumptive use of water. |
993 | 2. The Department of Environmental Protection shall limit |
994 | its comments to the subjects of air and water pollution, solid |
995 | waste, sewage, drinking water, state parks, greenways and |
996 | trails, state-owned lands, and wetlands. |
997 | 3. The Department of State shall limit its comments to the |
998 | subjects of historic and archeological resources. |
999 | 4. The Department of Transportation shall limit its |
1000 | comments to the subjects of roads and transportation facilities. |
1001 | 5. The Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission shall |
1002 | limit its comments to the subjects of fish and wildlife issues, |
1003 | including issues relating to fish and wildlife habitat and |
1004 | endangered species and their habitat. |
1005 | 6. The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services |
1006 | shall limit its comments to the subjects of agriculture, |
1007 | forestry, and aquaculture issues. |
1008 | 7. The Department of Education shall limit its comments to |
1009 | the subject of public school facilities. |
1010 | (5) ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PILOT |
1011 | AREAS.- |
1012 | (a) The local government shall hold its second public |
1013 | hearing, which shall be a hearing on whether to adopt one or |
1014 | more comprehensive plan amendments, on a weekday at least 5 days |
1015 | after the day the second advertisement is published pursuant to |
1016 | the requirements of chapter 125 or chapter 166. Adoption of |
1017 | comprehensive plan amendments must be by ordinance and requires |
1018 | an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the |
1019 | governing body present at the second hearing. |
1020 | (b) All comprehensive plan amendments adopted by the |
1021 | governing body along with the supporting data and analysis shall |
1022 | be transmitted within 10 days after of the second public hearing |
1023 | to the state land planning agency and any other agency or local |
1024 | government that provided timely comments under paragraph (4)(b). |
1025 | (6) ADMINISTRATIVE CHALLENGES TO PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR PILOT |
1026 | PROGRAM.- |
1027 | (a) Any "affected person" as defined in s. 163.3184(1)(a) |
1028 | may file a petition with the Division of Administrative Hearings |
1029 | pursuant to ss. 120.569 and 120.57, with a copy served on the |
1030 | affected local government, to request a formal hearing to |
1031 | challenge whether the amendments are "in compliance" as defined |
1032 | in s. 163.3184(1)(b). This petition must be filed with the |
1033 | division Division within 30 days after the local government |
1034 | adopts the amendment. The state land planning agency may |
1035 | intervene in a proceeding instituted by an affected person. |
1036 | (b) The state land planning agency may file a petition |
1037 | with the Division of Administrative Hearings pursuant to ss. |
1038 | 120.569 and 120.57, with a copy served on the affected local |
1039 | government, to request a formal hearing. This petition must be |
1040 | filed with the division Division within 30 days after the state |
1041 | land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan |
1042 | amendment package is complete. For purposes of this section, an |
1043 | adopted amendment package shall be deemed complete if it |
1044 | contains a full, executed copy of the adoption ordinance or |
1045 | ordinances; in the case of a text amendment, a full copy of the |
1046 | amended language in legislative format with new words inserted |
1047 | in the text underlined, and words to be deleted lined through |
1048 | with hyphens; in the case of a future land use map amendment, a |
1049 | copy of the future land use map clearly depicting the parcel, |
1050 | its existing future land use designation, and its adopted |
1051 | designation; and a copy of any data and analyses the local |
1052 | government deems appropriate. The state land planning agency |
1053 | shall notify the local government of any deficiencies within 5 |
1054 | working days after of receipt of an amendment package. |
1055 | (c) The state land planning agency's challenge shall be |
1056 | limited to those issues raised in the comments provided by the |
1057 | reviewing agencies pursuant to paragraph (4)(b). The state land |
1058 | planning agency may challenge a plan amendment that has |
1059 | substantially changed from the version on which the agencies |
1060 | provided comments. For the purposes of this pilot program, the |
1061 | Legislature strongly encourages The state land planning agency |
1062 | shall to focus any challenge on issues of regional or statewide |
1063 | importance. |
1064 | (d) An administrative law judge shall hold a hearing in |
1065 | the affected local jurisdiction. The local government's |
1066 | determination that the amendment is "in compliance" is presumed |
1067 | to be correct and shall be sustained unless it is shown by a |
1068 | preponderance of the evidence that the amendment is not "in |
1069 | compliance." |
1070 | (e) If the administrative law judge recommends that the |
1071 | amendment be found not in compliance, the judge shall submit the |
1072 | recommended order to the Administration Commission for final |
1073 | agency action. The Administration Commission shall enter a final |
1074 | order within 45 days after its receipt of the recommended order. |
1075 | (f) If the administrative law judge recommends that the |
1076 | amendment be found in compliance, the judge shall submit the |
1077 | recommended order to the state land planning agency. |
1078 | 1. If the state land planning agency determines that the |
1079 | plan amendment should be found not in compliance, the agency |
1080 | shall refer, within 30 days after of receipt of the recommended |
1081 | order, the recommended order and its determination to the |
1082 | Administration Commission for final agency action. If the |
1083 | commission determines that the amendment is not in compliance, |
1084 | it may sanction the local government as set forth in s. |
1085 | 163.3184(11). |
1086 | 2. If the state land planning agency determines that the |
1087 | plan amendment should be found in compliance, the agency shall |
1088 | enter its final order not later than 30 days after from receipt |
1089 | of the recommended order. |
1090 | (g) An amendment adopted under the expedited provisions of |
1091 | this section shall not become effective until 31 days after |
1092 | adoption. If timely challenged, an amendment shall not become |
1093 | effective until the state land planning agency or the |
1094 | Administration Commission enters a final order determining the |
1095 | adopted amendment to be in compliance. |
1096 | (h) Parties to a proceeding under this section may enter |
1097 | into compliance agreements using the process in s. 163.3184(16). |
1098 | Any remedial amendment adopted pursuant to a settlement |
1099 | agreement shall be provided to the agencies and governments |
1100 | listed in paragraph (4)(a). |
1101 | (7) APPLICABILITY OF PILOT PROGRAM IN CERTAIN LOCAL |
1102 | GOVERNMENTS.-Local governments and specific areas that have been |
1103 | designated for alternate review process pursuant to ss. 163.3246 |
1104 | and 163.3184(17) and (18) are not subject to this section. |
1105 | (8) RULEMAKING AUTHORITY FOR PILOT PROGRAM.-Agencies shall |
1106 | not promulgate rules to implement this pilot program. |
1107 | (9) REPORT.-The Office of Program Policy Analysis and |
1108 | Government Accountability shall submit to the Governor, the |
1109 | President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of |
1110 | Representatives by December 1, 2008, a report and |
1111 | recommendations for implementing a statewide program that |
1112 | addresses the legislative findings in subsection (1) in areas |
1113 | that meet urban criteria. The Office of Program Policy Analysis |
1114 | and Government Accountability in consultation with the state |
1115 | land planning agency shall develop the report and |
1116 | recommendations with input from other state and regional |
1117 | agencies, local governments, and interest groups. Additionally, |
1118 | the office shall review local and state actions and |
1119 | correspondence relating to the pilot program to identify issues |
1120 | of process and substance in recommending changes to the pilot |
1121 | program. At a minimum, the report and recommendations shall |
1122 | include the following: |
1123 | (a) Identification of local governments beyond those |
1124 | participating in the pilot program that should be subject to the |
1125 | alternative expedited state review process. The report may |
1126 | recommend that pilot program local governments may no longer be |
1127 | appropriate for such alternative review process. |
1128 | (b) Changes to the alternative expedited state review |
1129 | process for local comprehensive plan amendments identified in |
1130 | the pilot program. |
1131 | (c) Criteria for determining issues of regional or |
1132 | statewide importance that are to be protected in the alternative |
1133 | state review process. |
1134 | (d) In preparing the report and recommendations, the |
1135 | Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability |
1136 | shall consult with the state land planning agency, the |
1137 | Department of Transportation, the Department of Environmental |
1138 | Protection, and the regional planning agencies in identifying |
1139 | highly developed local governments to participate in the |
1140 | alternative expedited state review process. The Office of |
1141 | Program Policy Analysis and Governmental Accountability shall |
1142 | also solicit citizen input in the potentially affected areas and |
1143 | consult with the affected local governments and stakeholder |
1144 | groups. |
1145 | Section 9. Subsection (3) of section 380.115, Florida |
1146 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
1147 | 380.115 Vested rights and duties; effect of size |
1148 | reduction, changes in guidelines and standards.- |
1149 | (3) A landowner that has filed an application for a |
1150 | development-of-regional-impact review prior to the adoption of a |
1151 | an optional sector plan pursuant to s. 163.3245 may elect to |
1152 | have the application reviewed pursuant to s. 380.06, |
1153 | comprehensive plan provisions in force prior to adoption of the |
1154 | sector plan, and any requested comprehensive plan amendments |
1155 | that accompany the application. |
1156 | Section 10. This act shall take effect upon becoming a |
1157 | law. |
1158 |
|
1159 |
|
1160 | ----------------------------------------------------- |
1161 | T I T L E A M E N D M E N T |
1162 | Remove the entire title and insert: |
1163 | A bill to be entitled |
1164 | An act relating to growth management; amending s. |
1165 | 163.3191, F.S.; revising provisions relating to the |
1166 | evaluation and appraisal of comprehensive plans; providing |
1167 | requirements for exemption from such reporting |
1168 | requirements; revising requirements relating to reporting |
1169 | and scoping meetings; revising powers and duties of local |
1170 | planning agencies and governing bodies relating to the |
1171 | updating of local comprehensive plans pursuant to the |
1172 | evaluation and appraisal process; amending s. 163.3245, |
1173 | F.S.; revising provisions relating to optional sector |
1174 | plans; renaming optional sector plans as sector plans; |
1175 | increasing the minimum size of geographic areas that |
1176 | qualify for the use of sector plans; revising other |
1177 | terminology and deleting obsolete provisions; renaming |
1178 | long-term conceptual buildout overlays as long-term master |
1179 | plans; revising the content required to be included in |
1180 | long-term master plans and detailed specified area plans; |
1181 | requiring identification of water development projects and |
1182 | transportation facilities to serve future development |
1183 | needs; exempting certain developments from the requirement |
1184 | to develop a detailed specific area plan; providing that |
1185 | detailed specific area plans shall be adopted by local |
1186 | development orders; requiring that detailed specific area |
1187 | plans include a buildout date and precluding certain |
1188 | changes in the development until after that date; |
1189 | authorizing certain development agreements between the |
1190 | developer and the local government; providing for |
1191 | continuation of certain existing land uses; amending s. |
1192 | 163.32465, F.S.; revising provisions relating to state |
1193 | review of local comprehensive plans; revising intent; |
1194 | providing applicability; removing the pilot status of the |
1195 | alternative state review process and authorizing that |
1196 | process statewide; limiting agency comments regarding plan |
1197 | amendments to subjects within their scope of |
1198 | responsibility and oversight; amending ss. 163.3164, |
1199 | 163.3177, 163.3180, 163.3184, 163.3246, 380.115, F.S.; |
1200 | revising provisions to conform to changes made by this |
1201 | act; providing an effective date. |