| 1 | A bill to be entitled |
| 2 | An act relating to property rights; amending s. 70.001, |
| 3 | F.S.; revising a definition; shortening a notice period |
| 4 | for certain actions; providing for the state land planning |
| 5 | agency to receive notice of claims; revising procedures |
| 6 | for determining a governmental entity's final decision |
| 7 | identifying the allowable uses for a property; providing |
| 8 | that enactment of a law or adoption of a regulation does |
| 9 | not constitute applying the law or regulation; providing |
| 10 | for a waiver of sovereign immunity for liability; |
| 11 | providing for prospective application; providing an |
| 12 | effective date. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 | WHEREAS, the Legislature wishes to clarify its original |
| 15 | intent with respect to allowing appropriate compensation for |
| 16 | unduly burdened real property and to provide a waiver of |
| 17 | sovereign immunity under section 70.001, Florida Statutes, the |
| 18 | Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act, to |
| 19 | conform statutory language to Royal World Metropolitan, Inc. v. |
| 20 | City of Miami Beach, 863 So.2d 320 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 2003), and |
| 21 | WHEREAS, the Legislature wishes to emphasize the |
| 22 | alternative bases under this act for determining an existing |
| 23 | use, and to correct and to clarify that certain determinations |
| 24 | under this act are questions of law and fact, considered in City |
| 25 | of Jacksonville v. Coffield, 18 So.3d 589 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. |
| 26 | 2009), and |
| 27 | WHEREAS, the Legislature wishes to correct and to clarify |
| 28 | its original intent with respect to what constitutes the first |
| 29 | application of a law or regulation under the act, considered in |
| 30 | Citrus County, Florida v. Halls River Development, Inc., 8 So.3d |
| 31 | 413 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 2009), and M & H Profit, Inc. v. City of |
| 32 | Panama City, 28 So.3d 71 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 2010), and |
| 33 | WHEREAS, the Legislature wishes to make other changes to |
| 34 | clarify provisions of this act, NOW, THEREFORE, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 37 |
|
| 38 | Section 1. Paragraphs (b) and (e) of subsection (3), |
| 39 | paragraphs (a) and (c) of subsection (4), and subsections (5), |
| 40 | (6), (11), and (13) of section 70.001, Florida Statutes, are |
| 41 | amended to read: |
| 42 | 70.001 Private property rights protection.- |
| 43 | (3) For purposes of this section: |
| 44 | (b) The term "existing use" means: |
| 45 | 1. An actual, present use or activity on the real |
| 46 | property, including periods of inactivity which are normally |
| 47 | associated with, or are incidental to, the nature or type of |
| 48 | use; or |
| 49 | 2. Activity or such reasonably foreseeable, nonspeculative |
| 50 | land uses which are suitable for the subject real property and |
| 51 | compatible with adjacent land uses and which have created an |
| 52 | existing fair market value in the property greater than the fair |
| 53 | market value of the actual, present use or activity on the real |
| 54 | property. |
| 55 | (e) The terms "inordinate burden" and or "inordinately |
| 56 | burdened" mean that an action of one or more governmental |
| 57 | entities has directly restricted or limited the use of real |
| 58 | property such that the property owner is permanently unable to |
| 59 | attain the reasonable, investment-backed expectation for the |
| 60 | existing use of the real property or a vested right to a |
| 61 | specific use of the real property with respect to the real |
| 62 | property as a whole, or that the property owner is left with |
| 63 | existing or vested uses that are unreasonable such that the |
| 64 | property owner bears permanently a disproportionate share of a |
| 65 | burden imposed for the good of the public, which in fairness |
| 66 | should be borne by the public at large. The terms "inordinate |
| 67 | burden" and or "inordinately burdened" do not include temporary |
| 68 | impacts to real property; impacts to real property occasioned by |
| 69 | governmental abatement, prohibition, prevention, or remediation |
| 70 | of a public nuisance at common law or a noxious use of private |
| 71 | property; or impacts to real property caused by an action of a |
| 72 | governmental entity taken to grant relief to a property owner |
| 73 | under this section; however, a moratorium on development, as |
| 74 | defined in s. 380.04, that is in effect for longer than 1 year |
| 75 | is not a temporary impact to real property and, thus, depending |
| 76 | upon the particular circumstances, may constitute an "inordinate |
| 77 | burden" as provided in this paragraph. |
| 78 | (4)(a) Not less than 120 180 days prior to filing an |
| 79 | action under this section against a governmental entity, a |
| 80 | property owner who seeks compensation under this section must |
| 81 | present the claim in writing to the head of the governmental |
| 82 | entity, except that if the property is classified as |
| 83 | agricultural pursuant to s. 193.461, the notice period is 90 |
| 84 | days. The property owner must submit, along with the claim, a |
| 85 | bona fide, valid appraisal that supports the claim and |
| 86 | demonstrates the loss in fair market value to the real property. |
| 87 | If the action of government is the culmination of a process that |
| 88 | involves more than one governmental entity, or if a complete |
| 89 | resolution of all relevant issues, in the view of the property |
| 90 | owner or in the view of a governmental entity to whom a claim is |
| 91 | presented, requires the active participation of more than one |
| 92 | governmental entity, the property owner shall present the claim |
| 93 | as provided in this section to each of the governmental |
| 94 | entities. |
| 95 | (c) During the 90-day-notice period or the 120-day-notice |
| 96 | 180-day-notice period, unless extended by agreement of the |
| 97 | parties, the governmental entity shall make a written settlement |
| 98 | offer to effectuate: |
| 99 | 1. An adjustment of land development or permit standards |
| 100 | or other provisions controlling the development or use of land. |
| 101 | 2. Increases or modifications in the density, intensity, |
| 102 | or use of areas of development. |
| 103 | 3. The transfer of developmental rights. |
| 104 | 4. Land swaps or exchanges. |
| 105 | 5. Mitigation, including payments in lieu of onsite |
| 106 | mitigation. |
| 107 | 6. Location on the least sensitive portion of the |
| 108 | property. |
| 109 | 7. Conditioning the amount of development or use |
| 110 | permitted. |
| 111 | 8. A requirement that issues be addressed on a more |
| 112 | comprehensive basis than a single proposed use or development. |
| 113 | 9. Issuance of the development order, a variance, special |
| 114 | exception, or other extraordinary relief. |
| 115 | 10. Purchase of the real property, or an interest therein, |
| 116 | by an appropriate governmental entity or payment of |
| 117 | compensation. |
| 118 | 11. No changes to the action of the governmental entity. |
| 119 |
|
| 120 | If the property owner accepts the settlement offer, the |
| 121 | governmental entity may implement the settlement offer by |
| 122 | appropriate development agreement; by issuing a variance, |
| 123 | special exception, or other extraordinary relief; or by other |
| 124 | appropriate method, subject to paragraph (d). |
| 125 | (5)(a) During the 90-day-notice period or the 120-day- |
| 126 | notice 180-day-notice period, unless a settlement offer is |
| 127 | accepted by the property owner, each of the governmental |
| 128 | entities provided notice pursuant to paragraph (4)(a) shall |
| 129 | issue a written ripeness decision identifying the allowable uses |
| 130 | to which the subject property may be put. The failure of the |
| 131 | governmental entity to issue such a written ripeness decision |
| 132 | during the applicable 90-day-notice period or 120-day-notice |
| 133 | 180-day-notice period shall cause be deemed to ripen the prior |
| 134 | action of the governmental entity to become its final decision, |
| 135 | for purposes of this section, identifying the uses for the |
| 136 | subject property, and shall operate as a ripeness decision that |
| 137 | has been rejected by the property owner. Whether rendered by |
| 138 | submission of a written decision during the 120-day-notice |
| 139 | period or by failure to submit such a written decision, the |
| 140 | final decision of the governmental entity produced under this |
| 141 | paragraph operates as a final decision that has been rejected by |
| 142 | the property owner. This final The ripeness decision, as a |
| 143 | matter of law, constitutes the last prerequisite to judicial |
| 144 | review on the merits, and the matter shall be deemed ripe or |
| 145 | final for the purposes of the judicial proceeding created by |
| 146 | this section, notwithstanding the availability of other |
| 147 | administrative remedies. |
| 148 | (b) If the property owner rejects the settlement offer and |
| 149 | the final ripeness decision of the governmental entity or |
| 150 | entities, the property owner may file a claim for compensation |
| 151 | in the circuit court, a copy of which shall be served |
| 152 | contemporaneously on the head of each of the governmental |
| 153 | entities that made a settlement offer and a final ripeness |
| 154 | decision that was rejected by the property owner. Actions under |
| 155 | this section shall be brought only in the county where the real |
| 156 | property is located. |
| 157 | (6)(a) The circuit court shall determine whether an |
| 158 | existing use of the real property or a vested right to a |
| 159 | specific use of the real property existed and, if so, whether, |
| 160 | considering the settlement offer and final ripeness decision, |
| 161 | the governmental entity or entities have inordinately burdened |
| 162 | the real property. If the actions of more than one governmental |
| 163 | entity, considering any settlement offers and final ripeness |
| 164 | decisions, are responsible for the action that imposed the |
| 165 | inordinate burden on the real property of the property owner, |
| 166 | the court shall determine the percentage of responsibility each |
| 167 | such governmental entity bears with respect to the inordinate |
| 168 | burden. A governmental entity may take an interlocutory appeal |
| 169 | of the court's determination that the action of the governmental |
| 170 | entity has resulted in an inordinate burden. An interlocutory |
| 171 | appeal does not automatically stay the proceedings; however, the |
| 172 | court may stay the proceedings during the pendency of the |
| 173 | interlocutory appeal. If the governmental entity does not |
| 174 | prevail in the interlocutory appeal, the court shall award to |
| 175 | the prevailing property owner the costs and a reasonable |
| 176 | attorney fee incurred by the property owner in the interlocutory |
| 177 | appeal. |
| 178 | (b) Following its determination of the percentage of |
| 179 | responsibility of each governmental entity, and following the |
| 180 | resolution of any interlocutory appeal, the court shall impanel |
| 181 | a jury to determine the total amount of compensation to the |
| 182 | property owner for the loss in value due to the inordinate |
| 183 | burden to the real property. The award of compensation shall be |
| 184 | determined by calculating the difference in the fair market |
| 185 | value of the real property, as it existed at the time of the |
| 186 | governmental action at issue, as though the owner had the |
| 187 | ability to attain the reasonable investment-backed expectation |
| 188 | or was not left with uses that are unreasonable, whichever the |
| 189 | case may be, and the fair market value of the real property, as |
| 190 | it existed at the time of the governmental action at issue, as |
| 191 | inordinately burdened, considering the settlement offer together |
| 192 | with the final ripeness decision, of the governmental entity or |
| 193 | entities. In determining the award of compensation, |
| 194 | consideration may not be given to business damages relative to |
| 195 | any development, activity, or use that the action of the |
| 196 | governmental entity or entities, considering the settlement |
| 197 | offer together with the final ripeness decision, has restricted, |
| 198 | limited, or prohibited. The award of compensation shall include |
| 199 | a reasonable award of prejudgment interest from the date the |
| 200 | claim was presented to the governmental entity or entities as |
| 201 | provided in subsection (4). |
| 202 | (c)1. In any action filed pursuant to this section, the |
| 203 | property owner is entitled to recover reasonable costs and |
| 204 | attorney fees incurred by the property owner, from the |
| 205 | governmental entity or entities, according to their |
| 206 | proportionate share as determined by the court, from the date of |
| 207 | the filing of the circuit court action, if the property owner |
| 208 | prevails in the action and the court determines that the |
| 209 | settlement offer, including the final ripeness decision, of the |
| 210 | governmental entity or entities did not constitute a bona fide |
| 211 | offer to the property owner which reasonably would have resolved |
| 212 | the claim, based upon the knowledge available to the |
| 213 | governmental entity or entities and the property owner during |
| 214 | the 90-day-notice period or the 120-day-notice 180-day-notice |
| 215 | period. |
| 216 | 2. In any action filed pursuant to this section, the |
| 217 | governmental entity or entities are entitled to recover |
| 218 | reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred by the governmental |
| 219 | entity or entities from the date of the filing of the circuit |
| 220 | court action, if the governmental entity or entities prevail in |
| 221 | the action and the court determines that the property owner did |
| 222 | not accept a bona fide settlement offer, including the final |
| 223 | ripeness decision, which reasonably would have resolved the |
| 224 | claim fairly to the property owner if the settlement offer had |
| 225 | been accepted by the property owner, based upon the knowledge |
| 226 | available to the governmental entity or entities and the |
| 227 | property owner during the 90-day-notice period or the 120-day- |
| 228 | notice 180-day-notice period. |
| 229 | 3. The determination of total reasonable costs and |
| 230 | attorney fees pursuant to this paragraph shall be made by the |
| 231 | court and not by the jury. Any proposed settlement offer or any |
| 232 | proposed ripeness decision, except for the final written |
| 233 | settlement offer or the final written ripeness decision, and any |
| 234 | negotiations or rejections in regard to the formulation either |
| 235 | of the settlement offer or the final ripeness decision, are |
| 236 | inadmissible in the subsequent proceeding established by this |
| 237 | section except for the purposes of the determination pursuant to |
| 238 | this paragraph. |
| 239 | (d) Within 15 days after the execution of any settlement |
| 240 | pursuant to this section, or the issuance of any judgment |
| 241 | pursuant to this section, the governmental entity shall provide |
| 242 | a copy of the settlement or judgment to the Department of Legal |
| 243 | Affairs. |
| 244 | (11) A cause of action may not be commenced under this |
| 245 | section if the claim is presented more than 1 year after a law |
| 246 | or regulation is first applied by the governmental entity to the |
| 247 | property at issue. For purposes of this section, enacting a law |
| 248 | or adopting a regulation does not constitute applying the law or |
| 249 | regulation to a property. If an owner seeks relief from the |
| 250 | governmental action through lawfully available administrative or |
| 251 | judicial proceedings, the time for bringing an action under this |
| 252 | section is tolled until the conclusion of such proceedings. |
| 253 | (13) In accordance with s. 13, Art. X of the State |
| 254 | Constitution, the state, for itself and for its agencies or |
| 255 | political subdivisions, waives sovereign immunity for causes of |
| 256 | action based upon the application of any law, regulation, or |
| 257 | ordinance subject to this section, but only to the extent |
| 258 | specified in this section This section does not affect the |
| 259 | sovereign immunity of government. |
| 260 | Section 2. The amendments to s. 70.001, Florida Statutes, |
| 261 | made by this act apply prospectively only and do not apply to |
| 262 | any claim or action filed under s. 70.001, Florida Statutes, |
| 263 | which is pending on the effective date of this act. |
| 264 | Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2011. |