1 | A bill to be entitled |
2 | An act relating to public records; amending s. 11.51, |
3 | F.S.; creating an exemption from public records |
4 | requirements for work papers held by the Office of Program |
5 | Policy Analysis and Government Accountability that relate |
6 | to an authorized project or a research product; providing |
7 | for retroactive application; providing a statement of |
8 | public necessity; providing a contingent effective date. |
9 |
|
10 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
11 |
|
12 | Section 1. Subsection (7) is added to section 11.51, |
13 | Florida Statutes, to read: |
14 | 11.51 Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government |
15 | Accountability.- |
16 | (7) Work papers held by the Office of Program Policy |
17 | Analysis and Government Accountability that relate to an |
18 | authorized project or a research product are exempt from s. |
19 | 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution. The exemption applies |
20 | to work papers held by the Office of Program Policy Analysis and |
21 | Government Accountability before, on, or after the effective |
22 | date of the exemption. |
23 | Section 2. The Legislature finds that it is a public |
24 | necessity that certain work papers held by the Office of Program |
25 | Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA) be made |
26 | exempt from section 24(a), Article I of the State Constitution. |
27 | As required by the Legislature, OPPAGA may provide independent |
28 | evaluative research and objective analyses to promote government |
29 | accountability and the efficient and effective use of public |
30 | resources. In order for OPPAGA to accomplish this mission, it is |
31 | necessary that individuals and businesses share information with |
32 | OPPAGA staff without concerns of competitive disadvantage, |
33 | disclosure, or reprisals. Private sector business entities have |
34 | legitimate concerns that information provided to assist the |
35 | Legislature in directing policy initiatives will be protected |
36 | from those in the marketplace who could gain financially from |
37 | the ability to access information collected by OPPAGA. In |
38 | addition, supervisors and others often want to know the |
39 | information given by their employees as part of an OPPAGA |
40 | project for the Legislature. If such information were available |
41 | as a public record, fewer people would be willing to provide |
42 | information needed by the Legislature to evaluate ongoing |
43 | programs. Also, during the project process, much information is |
44 | collected that must be validated before it is relied upon by |
45 | OPPAGA and some information is not validated. Without a public |
46 | record exemption, any person could inspect and copy the record |
47 | containing the unverified information and risk placing on the |
48 | public record unproven allegations that could harm, embarrass, |
49 | humiliate, or cause serious personal or commercial consequences |
50 | to the individual or business as a result of their discussions |
51 | with OPPAGA. Providing a public record exemption for OPPAGA work |
52 | papers will facilitate the ability of OPPAGA to acquire |
53 | important project information for the Legislature and protect |
54 | the public from inappropriate disclosure of proprietary and |
55 | confidential information and from allegations that may not be |
56 | proven with further investigation. An exemption of limited |
57 | duration would not be sufficient to protect the previously |
58 | identified interests. Thus, the Legislature finds that it is a |
59 | public necessity to make exempt from the public records |
60 | requirements of the State Constitution work papers held by |
61 | OPPAGA that relate to an authorized project or to a research |
62 | product. |
63 | Section 3. This act shall take effect on the same date |
64 | that SB 1204 or similar legislation takes effect, if such |
65 | legislation is adopted in the same legislative session, or an |
66 | extension thereof, and becomes law. |