| 1 | Representative Eisnaugle offered the following: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 | Amendment (with ballot amendment) |
| 4 | ----------------------------------------------------- |
| 5 | B A L L O T A M E N D M E N T |
| 6 | Remove lines 689-898 and insert: |
| 7 | CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT |
| 8 | ARTICLE V, SECTIONS 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, 14, AND 21 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 | STATE COURTS.-Proposing a revision of Article V of the |
| 11 | State Constitution relating to the judiciary. |
| 12 | Under current law, the Florida Supreme Court is the highest |
| 13 | court in Florida and hears both civil and criminal cases. It has |
| 14 | 7 appointed justices. This revision would divide the current |
| 15 | Supreme Court into two divisions, one hearing civil cases and |
| 16 | the other hearing criminal cases. Each division would have 5 |
| 17 | appointed justices who are permanently assigned. The 3 current |
| 18 | justices who have the most service with the Florida Supreme |
| 19 | Court would be assigned to the criminal division, the remaining |
| 20 | 4 current justices would be assigned to the civil division, and |
| 21 | the Governor would appoint 3 new justices to fill the remaining |
| 22 | openings in the two divisions. The existing jurisdiction of the |
| 23 | Supreme Court would be expanded to allow discretionary review of |
| 24 | certain district court of appeal decisions. This revision |
| 25 | generally defines the civil law and criminal law jurisdiction of |
| 26 | each division, provides for assignment of cases to each |
| 27 | respective division, and allows the Legislature, by general law, |
| 28 | to further define the jurisdictions of each division. The |
| 29 | jurisdiction of a division will be limited to the division's |
| 30 | area, whether civil or criminal. The power of justices of the |
| 31 | criminal division to hear appeals from final judgments entered |
| 32 | in proceedings for the validation of bonds or certificates of |
| 33 | indebtedness and to review action of statewide agencies relating |
| 34 | to rates or service of utilities providing electric, gas, or |
| 35 | telephone service is limited by this revision and granted |
| 36 | exclusively to the civil division. The power of justices of the |
| 37 | civil division to issue a writ of habeas corpus and to hear |
| 38 | appeals from final judgments of trial courts imposing the death |
| 39 | penalty is limited by this revision and granted exclusively to |
| 40 | the justices of the criminal division. This revision provides |
| 41 | that if both divisions assert jurisdiction over a case, the |
| 42 | Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Florida will decide where |
| 43 | jurisdiction is appropriate. |
| 44 | This proposed revision also creates a title of chief |
| 45 | justice in each of the divisions with an 8-year term. The |
| 46 | constitution currently provides that the Chief Justice of the |
| 47 | Supreme Court is the administrative head of the state judicial |
| 48 | system. This revision provides that the position of Chief |
| 49 | Justice of the Supreme Court will rotate every 4 years between |
| 50 | the chief justice of the civil division and the chief justice of |
| 51 | the criminal division. The constitution currently also provides |
| 52 | that the chief justice is chosen by vote of the justices. This |
| 53 | revision provides that the initial new justices and the initial |
| 54 | chief justice of each division will be selected by the Governor |
| 55 | and future chief justices will be selected by the Governor |
| 56 | subject to Senate confirmation. A chief justice is, like a |
| 57 | regular justice under current law, subject to retention election |
| 58 | and mandatory retirement requirements applicable to all Florida |
| 59 | justices and judges. |
| 60 | Under current law, the Governor appoints a justice from a |
| 61 | list of nominees provided by a judicial nominating commission, |
| 62 | and appointments by the Governor are not subject to |
| 63 | confirmation. Other than the initial 3 new appointees, this |
| 64 | revision requires Senate confirmation of a justice before the |
| 65 | appointee can take office. If the Senate votes not to confirm |
| 66 | the appointment, the judicial nominating commission must |
| 67 | reconvene and may not renominate any person whose prior |
| 68 | appointment to fill the same vacancy was not confirmed by the |
| 69 | Senate. For the purpose of confirmation, the Senate may meet at |
| 70 | any time or may appoint a committee to decide confirmations |
| 71 | while the Senate is not in session. If the Senate does not vote |
| 72 | against confirmation within 90 days, the justice will be deemed |
| 73 | confirmed and will take office. |
| 74 | The State Constitution authorizes the Supreme Court to |
| 75 | adopt rules for the practice and procedure in all courts. The |
| 76 | constitution further provides that a rule of court may be |
| 77 | repealed by a general law enacted by a two-thirds vote of the |
| 78 | membership of each house of the Legislature. This proposed |
| 79 | constitutional revision eliminates the requirement that a |
| 80 | general law repealing a court rule pass by a two-thirds vote of |
| 81 | each house. The Legislature could repeal a rule of court by a |
| 82 | general law approved by a majority vote of each house of the |
| 83 | Legislature that expresses the policy behind the repeal. The |
| 84 | court could readopt the rule in conformity with the public |
| 85 | policy expressed by the Legislature, but if the Legislature |
| 86 | repeals the readopted rule, this proposed revision prohibits the |
| 87 | court from readopting the repealed rule without the |
| 88 | Legislature's prior approval. Court rules may be adopted by both |
| 89 | divisions of the Supreme Court meeting jointly, or the court may |
| 90 | elect to divide classes of rules between the divisions. |
| 91 | The Judicial Qualifications Commission is an independent |
| 92 | commission created by the State Constitution to investigate and |
| 93 | prosecute before the Florida Supreme Court alleged misconduct by |
| 94 | a justice or judge. Currently under the constitution, commission |
| 95 | proceedings are confidential until formal charges are filed by |
| 96 | the investigative panel of the commission. Once formal charges |
| 97 | are filed, the formal charges and all further proceedings of the |
| 98 | commission are public. Currently, the constitution authorizes |
| 99 | the House of Representatives to impeach a justice or judge. |
| 100 | Further, the Speaker of the House of Representatives may |
| 101 | request, and the Judicial Qualifications Commission must make |
| 102 | available, all information in the commission's possession for |
| 103 | use in deciding whether to impeach a justice or judge. This |
| 104 | proposed revision requires the commission to make all of its |
| 105 | files available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, |
| 106 | rather than just the file of a justice or judge under |
| 107 | investigation by the House of Representatives. Such files would |
| 108 | maintain their confidentiality unless the House of |
| 109 | Representatives initiates impeachment proceedings against a |
| 110 | justice or judge, in which case the files related to that |
| 111 | justice or judge may be open. This revision deletes a |
| 112 | requirement that a general law repealing a commission rule be |
| 113 | passed by a majority vote of the membership of each house of the |
| 114 | Legislature and revises the number of Supreme Court justices |
| 115 | needed to repeal such a rule. |
| 116 | State appropriations are made annually by general law. |
| 117 | Current law does not require any specific level of funding for |
| 118 | any agency or department. This revision requires that the courts |
| 119 | be appropriated a minimum of 2.25 percent of general revenue |
| 120 | funding beginning with the 2013-2014 fiscal year. |
| 121 | This revision will take effect upon its passage by the |
| 122 | electorate and provides a schedule for implementation of its |
| 123 | provisions. This revision makes other conforming and modernizing |
| 124 | changes to the State Constitution regarding the judicial system, |
| 125 | including removing the positions of clerk and marshal of the |
| 126 | Supreme Court and the courts of appeal from the constitution; |
| 127 | providing for transition to the new divisions; removing outdated |
| 128 | schedules related to the Judicial Qualifications Commission; and |
| 129 | making conforming and technical changes in the judicial articles |
| 130 | of the constitution. |
| 131 |
|
| 132 | BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following statement be |
| 133 | placed on the ballot if a court declares the preceding statement |
| 134 | defective and the decision of the court is not reversed: |
| 135 |
|
| 136 | CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT |
| 137 | ARTICLE V, SECTIONS 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, 14, AND 21 |
| 138 |
|
| 139 | JUDICIARY.-Proposing a revision of the Judiciary Article of |
| 140 | the Florida Constitution; reorganizing the Florida Supreme Court |
| 141 | into divisions; requiring Senate confirmation for appointment of |
| 142 | a Supreme Court justice; providing standards and procedures for |
| 143 | legislative repeal of a court rule; providing a minimum level of |
| 144 | court funding; allowing legislative review of confidential files |
| 145 | of the Judicial Qualifications Commission; providing for |
| 146 | transition; and making other ancillary amendments, including, |
| 147 | but not limited to, technical and conforming amendments. |
| 148 |
|
| 149 | BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following statement be |
| 150 | placed on the ballot if a court declares the preceding |
| 151 | statements defective and the decision of the court is not |
| 152 | reversed: |
| 153 |
|
| 154 | CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT |
| 155 | ARTICLE V, SECTIONS 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, 14, AND 21 |
| 156 |
|
| 157 | STATE COURTS.-Proposing a revision to Article V of the |
| 158 | State Constitution relating to the judiciary; changing the |
| 159 | authority of the Legislature to repeal a court rule by 2/3 vote |
| 160 | of the membership of each house to a simple majority of each |
| 161 | house; limiting the Supreme Court's ability to readopt a rule |
| 162 | repealed by the Legislature; replacing the current seven-member |
| 163 | Supreme Court with two five-member divisions of the Supreme |
| 164 | Court, one with civil jurisdiction and one with criminal |
| 165 | jurisdiction; establishing a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court |
| 166 | who shall serve as the chief administrative officer for the |
| 167 | courts; establishing a chief justice for the civil division of |
| 168 | the Supreme Court; establishing a chief justice for the criminal |
| 169 | division of the Supreme Court; providing for the manner of |
| 170 | selection and term for the chief justice of each division of the |
| 171 | Supreme Court; changing the manner of designation and term of |
| 172 | office of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court; providing that |
| 173 | a chief justice of a division of the Supreme Court is subject to |
| 174 | a retention election and eligibility requirements as currently |
| 175 | established in the State Constitution; providing for manner of |
| 176 | replacement of a chief justice of a division; providing for |
| 177 | apportionment of current justices among the civil and criminal |
| 178 | divisions of the Supreme Court; changing the requirements for a |
| 179 | quorum from four to three as being necessary for a decision; |
| 180 | providing authority and circumstances where the divisions of the |
| 181 | Supreme Court may meet en banc; providing jurisdiction for each |
| 182 | division of the Supreme Court, including matters which will be |
| 183 | exclusive to each division; clarifying the jurisdiction of the |
| 184 | Supreme Court to hear appeals from certain district court of |
| 185 | appeal decisions; providing that the Legislature may further |
| 186 | define the split of jurisdiction between civil and criminal |
| 187 | matters; providing that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court |
| 188 | decides jurisdiction should both divisions claim jurisdiction |
| 189 | over the same case; removing references to clerks and marshals; |
| 190 | requiring Senate confirmation before a justice may take office; |
| 191 | providing that if the Senate does not act within 90 days the |
| 192 | nominee is deemed confirmed as a justice; allowing the Senate to |
| 193 | meet outside of regular session without having the House of |
| 194 | Representatives convene at the same time; allowing Senate Rule |
| 195 | to designate a committee that may confirm a nominee; deleting |
| 196 | outdated references; requiring the Judicial Qualifications |
| 197 | Commission to provide the House of Representatives access to |
| 198 | records; providing for confidentiality of records; requiring a |
| 199 | minimum level of funding for the judicial system; providing for |
| 200 | transition; requiring the current Supreme Court to list its |
| 201 | members by seniority in office; providing that the three most |
| 202 | senior justices be assigned to the criminal division and the |
| 203 | remaining justices assigned to the criminal division; providing |
| 204 | time limits for appointments by the Governor for the remaining |
| 205 | seats; providing an exception to Senate confirmation for initial |
| 206 | appointments; requiring the Governor to name the initial chief |
| 207 | justice of each division; providing that the initial chief |
| 208 | justice of the civil division be named the Chief Justice of the |
| 209 | Supreme Court; requiring that existing cases be split between |
| 210 | the divisions; providing that cases decided before the split |
| 211 | into divisions are final and not subject to rehearing or recall |
| 212 | of the mandate; providing for the terms of the initial chief |
| 213 | justices of the divisions; providing for adoption of court |
| 214 | rules; allowing the Legislature by general law to further |
| 215 | provide for transition; providing that the transition schedules |
| 216 | may be deleted by general law when they have become outdated. |