| 1 | A bill to be entitled |
| 2 | An act relating to noncriminal traffic infractions; |
| 3 | creating s. 316.0077, F.S.; providing for testing of |
| 4 | certain unattended devices used to enforce traffic |
| 5 | laws; providing that such devices used to enforce |
| 6 | speed limit laws are also subject to specified |
| 7 | provisions; providing civil fines for violations; |
| 8 | amending s. 318.14, F.S.; specifying that, at a |
| 9 | hearing of any charge of a noncriminal traffic |
| 10 | infraction, the burden for proving guilt rests with |
| 11 | the government entity bringing the charge; specifying |
| 12 | that a person may not be compelled to be a witness |
| 13 | against himself or herself in any hearing of a |
| 14 | noncriminal traffic infraction; specifying that any |
| 15 | person charged with a violation that involves a |
| 16 | traffic infraction detector or any similar device has |
| 17 | the right to confront any witnesses against him or |
| 18 | her; requiring that evidence obtained from such device |
| 19 | must be authenticated in court by certain persons who |
| 20 | must appear in person and offer direct testimony and |
| 21 | account in writing for any evidence used; providing |
| 22 | for witness compensation pursuant to specified |
| 23 | provisions; providing that a person receiving a notice |
| 24 | of violation involving such device has the option of |
| 25 | paying a fine or requesting a hearing without further |
| 26 | issuance of a traffic citation and may not be charged |
| 27 | a surcharge for requesting the hearing; providing that |
| 28 | there shall be no prosecution of a traffic infraction |
| 29 | based upon evidence from such device and a notice of |
| 30 | violation or citation based on such device is void |
| 31 | unless the device has passed specified accuracy test; |
| 32 | providing an effective date. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 | Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: |
| 35 |
|
| 36 | Section 1. Section 316.0077, Florida Statutes, is created |
| 37 | to read: |
| 38 | 316.0077 Unattended traffic law enforcement devices.- |
| 39 | (1)(a) Any traffic infraction detector or similar |
| 40 | unattended device used to enforce the traffic laws of this state |
| 41 | must be tested for accuracy at least once every 6 months. Such |
| 42 | accuracy test shall consist of, at a minimum: |
| 43 | 1. The length of time a traffic control device monitored |
| 44 | by the detector or similar device exhibits a yellow signal, if |
| 45 | applicable. |
| 46 | 2. The amount of time elapsed, in milliseconds, between |
| 47 | the alleged violation and the capturing of any photograph or |
| 48 | video. |
| 49 | 3. Real-time verification that the vehicle or device used |
| 50 | for the accuracy test provides a valid test of the response of |
| 51 | the traffic infraction detector or similar unattended device |
| 52 | used to enforce the traffic laws of this state to an actual |
| 53 | potential violator. |
| 54 | (b) Any traffic infraction detector or other unattended |
| 55 | device used to enforce the unlawful speed laws of this state is |
| 56 | also subject to s. 316.1905. |
| 57 | (2) The accuracy checks shall be random and unannounced |
| 58 | and conducted by a private company that does not have any |
| 59 | interest in the outcome of the accuracy check. A government |
| 60 | agency or company that gives away, leases, or sells traffic |
| 61 | infraction detectors or similar unattended devices used to |
| 62 | enforce the traffic laws of this state or any affiliate of such |
| 63 | company may not perform the accuracy check. Any company |
| 64 | operating a traffic infraction detector or similar unattended |
| 65 | device used to enforce the traffic laws of this state shall |
| 66 | provide access and cooperation for the accuracy check, shall pay |
| 67 | the costs of the accuracy check, and may not charge for access. |
| 68 | (3) A person engaged in the process of an accuracy check |
| 69 | does not commit a violation of this chapter unless the check is |
| 70 | conducted in a reckless manner. |
| 71 | (4) A government agency or a company that operates, gives |
| 72 | away, leases, or sells traffic infraction detectors or similar |
| 73 | unattended devices used to enforce the traffic laws of this |
| 74 | state that violates this section shall pay a civil fine of not |
| 75 | less than $500 per incident to the person aggrieved. |
| 76 | Section 2. Subsection (6) of section 318.14, Florida |
| 77 | Statutes, is amended to read: |
| 78 | 318.14 Noncriminal traffic infractions; exception; |
| 79 | procedures.- |
| 80 | (6)(a) The commission of a charged infraction at a hearing |
| 81 | under this chapter must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. |
| 82 | (b) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, in any |
| 83 | hearing of a charge of a noncriminal traffic infraction, the |
| 84 | burden of proving guilt rests upon the government entity |
| 85 | bringing the charge. A person appearing in any such hearing may |
| 86 | not be compelled to be a witness against himself or herself. |
| 87 | (c) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, in any |
| 88 | prosecution involving a traffic infraction detector or similar |
| 89 | unattended device used to enforce traffic laws of this state, a |
| 90 | person so charged has the right to confront the witnesses |
| 91 | against him or her. Any evidence obtained from such device must |
| 92 | be authenticated in court by the person receiving or processing |
| 93 | such evidence, any person having reviewed such evidence in order |
| 94 | to make a decision to file a notice of violation, and any person |
| 95 | that issued the notice of violation or traffic citation. An |
| 96 | affidavit is not sufficient to authenticate such evidence, and |
| 97 | such evidence must be accounted for in writing from the time of |
| 98 | the alleged violation until the issuance of a notice of |
| 99 | violation or traffic citation. Compensation of any witness for |
| 100 | the prosecution shall be provided as required in s. 92.143. |
| 101 | (d) Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, a person |
| 102 | receiving a notice of violation involving a traffic infraction |
| 103 | detector or similar unattended device used to enforce traffic |
| 104 | laws of this state has the option of requesting a hearing or |
| 105 | paying a fine. If the person so charged requests a hearing, no |
| 106 | payment or fee may be required prior to conviction and no |
| 107 | further traffic citations may be issued to such person based on |
| 108 | the violation for which a hearing was requested. |
| 109 | (e) There shall be no prosecution of a charge for an |
| 110 | alleged violation based on evidence from a traffic infraction |
| 111 | detector or similar unattended device used to enforce traffic |
| 112 | laws of this state, and a notice of violation or citation based |
| 113 | on such device is void unless the device has passed the accuracy |
| 114 | test specified in s. 316.0077. |
| 115 | Section 3. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. |