Florida Senate - 2013 SB 1276 By Senator Montford 3-00298A-13 20131276__ 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to public meetings; amending s. 3 1004.28, F.S.; providing an exemption from public 4 meeting requirements for certain portions of meetings 5 of a university direct-support organization or of the 6 executive committee or other committees of the board 7 of directors of such organization; providing for 8 legislative review and repeal of the exemption; 9 providing a statement of public necessity; providing 10 an effective date. 11 12 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 13 14 Section 1. Subsection (5) of section 1004.28, Florida 15 Statutes, is amended to read: 16 1004.28 Direct-support organizations; use of property; 17 board of directors; activities; audit; facilities.— 18 (5) ANNUAL AUDIT; PUBLIC RECORDS AND MEETINGS EXEMPTION.— 19 (a) Each direct-support organization shall provide for an 20 annual financial audit of its accounts and records to be 21 conducted by an independent certified public accountant in 22 accordance with rules adopted by the Auditor General pursuant to 23 s. 11.45(8) and by the university board of trustees. The annual 24 audit report shall be submitted, within 9 months after the end 25 of the fiscal year, to the Auditor General and the Board of 26 Governors for review. The Board of Governors, the university 27 board of trustees, the Auditor General, and the Office of 28 Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountabilityshallhave 29 the authority to require and receive from the organization or 30 from its independent auditoranyrecords relative to the 31 operation of the organization. 32 (b) The identity of donors who desire to remain anonymous 33 shall be protected, and that anonymity shall be maintained in 34 the auditor’s report. All records of the organization other than 35 the auditor’s report, management letter, andanysupplemental 36 data requested by the Board of Governors, the university board 37 of trustees, the Auditor General, and the Office of Program 38 Policy Analysis and Government Accountability areshall be39 confidential and exempt fromthe provisions ofs. 119.07(1). 40 (c) Any portion of a meeting of the board of directors of 41 the organization, or of the executive committee or other 42 committees of such board, at which the identity of a donor or 43 prospective donor, a proposal seeking research funding from the 44 organization, or a plan or program for either initiating or 45 supporting research is discussed, is exempt from s. 286.011 and 46 s. 24(b), Art. I of the State Constitution. This paragraph is 47 subject to the Open Government Sunset Review Act in accordance 48 with s. 119.15, and shall stand repealed on October 2, 2018, 49 unless reviewed and saved from repeal through reenactment by the 50 Legislature. 51 Section 2. (1) The Legislature finds that it is a public 52 necessity that a portion of a meeting of the board of directors 53 of a university direct-support organization, or the executive 54 committee or other committees of the board, at which the 55 identity of a donor or prospective donor is discussed be exempt 56 from disclosure. For the benefit of the state universities, and 57 ultimately all citizens of this state, direct-support 58 organizations serve a vital role in raising charitable donations 59 from private sources. This undertaking demands great sensitivity 60 and discretion, as donors and prospective donors frequently seek 61 anonymity and are concerned about the potential release of 62 sensitive financial information. If direct-support organizations 63 cannot protect the anonymity of donors or prospective donors, 64 prospective donors may decline to contribute, thus hampering the 65 ability of the direct-support organization to fully accomplish 66 its mission. The state recognizes these realities by expressly 67 making most of the records of direct-support organizations 68 confidential and exempt from the state’s public records laws, 69 including the identity of donors or prospective donors. Failure 70 to close meetings at which the identity of donors or prospective 71 donors is discussed would significantly compromise the 72 confidentiality of such donors. 73 (2) The Legislature further finds that it is a public 74 necessity that a portion of a meeting of the board of directors 75 of a university direct-support organization, or the executive 76 committee or other committees of the board, at which a proposal 77 seeking research funding from the organization or a plan or 78 program for either initiating or supporting research is 79 discussed be exempt from disclosure. The resources raised by 80 direct-support organizations are frequently used to fund 81 university-connected research projects, which provide valuable 82 opportunities for faculty and students and may lead to future 83 commercial applications. This activity requires the direct 84 support organization to evaluate proposals and examine plans or 85 programs for either initiating or supporting research which 86 contain highly proprietary information, including specific 87 research approaches and targets of investigation. Maintaining 88 the confidentiality of research plans and proposals is a 89 hallmark of research funding, is practiced by the National 90 Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, and 91 allows for candid exchanges between reviewers critiquing plans 92 and proposals. This exemption is necessary because the failure 93 to close access to portions of meetings in which these 94 activities are discussed would significantly undermine the 95 confidentiality of the research plans and proposals and may 96 injure the affected researcher. 97 Section 3. This act shall take effect October 1, 2013.