Florida Senate - 2013 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. SB 1716 Barcode 951118 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House Comm: RCS . 04/02/2013 . . . . ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— The Committee on Community Affairs (Soto) recommended the following: 1 Senate Amendment (with title amendment) 2 3 Delete lines 26 - 81 4 and insert: 5 transportation concurrency within its jurisdiction and may not 6 require a proportionate-share contribution or construction for 7 new business development before July 1, 2016, unless authorized 8 by the affirmative majority vote of the local government’s 9 governing authority. 10 (b) Paragraph (a) does not apply to proportionate-share 11 contribution or construction assessed on existing developments 12 before July 1, 2013. 13 (c) In order to maintain the exemption from transportation 14 concurrency and proportionate-share contribution or construction 15 pursuant to paragraph (a), a new business development must 16 receive a certificate of occupancy by July 1, 2017. If the 17 certificate of occupancy is not received by July 1, 2017, the 18 local government may apply transportation concurrency and 19 require the appropriate proportionate-share contribution or 20 construction for the business development that would have been 21 applied but for this subsection. The new business development 22 must consist of 6,000 square feet or less for anything 23 classified as other than nonresidential. Any outstanding 24 obligation related to the proportionate-share contribution or 25 construction runs with the land and is enforceable against any 26 person claiming a fee interest in the land subject to that 27 obligation. 28 (d) This subsection does not apply if it requires any 29 modification to a local government’s financing that would 30 invalidate existing contracts, including debt obligations or 31 covenants and agreements relating to bonds validated or issued 32 by the local government. 33 (e) Upon written notification to the local government, a 34 developer may elect to have the local government apply 35 transportation concurrency and proportionate-share contribution 36 or construction to a business development. 37 (f) This subsection expires July 1, 2017. 38 Section 2. Subsection (6) is added to section 163.31801, 39 Florida Statutes, to read: 40 163.31801 Impact fees; short title; intent; definitions; 41 ordinances levying impact fees.— 42 (6)(a) Notwithstanding any provision of law, ordinance, or 43 resolution to the contrary, a county, municipality, or special 44 district may not impose any new or existing impact fee or any 45 new or existing fee associated with the mitigation of 46 transportation impacts on new business development until July 1, 47 2016, unless authorized by the affirmative majority vote of the 48 governing authority of the county, municipality, or special 49 district. Any governing authority of a local government imposing 50 an impact fee in existence on July 1, 2012, must reauthorize the 51 imposition of the fee pursuant to this paragraph. 52 (b) Paragraph (a) does not apply to any impact fee or fee 53 associated with the mitigation of transportation impacts 54 previously enacted by law, ordinance, or resolution assessed on 55 existing business development before July 1, 2013. 56 (c) In order to maintain the exemption from impact fees and 57 fees associated with the mitigation of transportation impacts 58 pursuant to paragraph (a), a new business development must 59 receive a 60 61 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================ 62 And the title is amended as follows: 63 Delete lines 4 - 6 64 and insert: 65 applying transportation concurrency or requiring 66 proportionate-share contribution or construction for 67 new business development for a specified