Florida Senate - 2013 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. SB 824 Barcode 234164 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House Comm: RCS . 04/09/2013 . . . . ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— The Committee on Governmental Oversight and Accountability (Simmons) recommended the following: 1 Senate Amendment (with title amendment) 2 3 Delete lines 21 - 50 4 and insert: 5 court under this chapter is confidential and exempt from s. 6 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution. 7 (2) As used in this section, the term “forensic behavioral 8 health evaluation” means any record, including supporting 9 documentation, derived from a competency, substance abuse, 10 psychosexual, psychological, psychiatric, psychosocial, 11 cognitive impairment, sanity, or other mental health evaluation 12 of an individual. 13 Section 2. The Legislature finds that it is a public 14 necessity that forensic behavioral health evaluations filed with 15 the court pursuant to chapter 916, Florida Statutes, be 16 confidential and exempt from disclosure under s. 24(a), Art. I 17 of the State Constitution. The personal health of an individual 18 and the treatment he or she receives is an intensely private 19 matter. An individual’s forensic behavioral health evaluation 20 should not be made public merely because it is filed with the 21 court. Protecting forensic behavioral health evaluations is 22 necessary to consistently protect the health care privacy rights 23 of all persons. Making these evaluations confidential and exempt 24 will protect information of a sensitive personal nature, the 25 release of which would cause unwarranted damage to the 26 reputation of an individual. Further, the knowledge that 27 sensitive personal information is subject to disclosure could 28 have a chilling effect on mental health experts who conduct the 29 evaluations for use by the court. Therefore, making these 30 evaluations confidential and exempt allows courts to effectively 31 and efficiently make decisions relating to the competency of 32 individuals who interact with the state courts system. 33 34 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================ 35 And the title is amended as follows: 36 Delete lines 7 - 10 37 and insert: 38 providing a