Florida Senate - 2014 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. CS for CS for SB 1576 Ì8445441Î844544 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House Comm: RCS . 04/24/2014 . . . . ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— The Committee on Appropriations (Montford) recommended the following: 1 Senate Amendment to Amendment (356190) (with title 2 amendment) 3 4 Delete lines 468 - 523 5 and insert: 6 (1) By December 31, 2014, the department shall adopt rules 7 to fund pilot projects that test the effectiveness of innovative 8 or existing nutrient reduction or water conservation 9 technologies or practices designed to minimize nutrient 10 pollution in the springs of this state. The department may 11 approve funding for pilot projects each funding cycle if the 12 department determines that the pilot project will not be harmful 13 to the ecological resources in the study area. 14 (2) By December 31, 2014, the department shall adopt rules 15 to evaluate, rank, and select projects eligible for funding 16 under this part or land acquisition pursuant to s. 17 201.15(1)(c)3.b. In developing these rules, the department shall 18 give preference to the projects that will result in the greatest 19 improvement to water quality and water quantity for the dollars 20 to be expended for the project. At a minimum, the department 21 shall consider: 22 (a) The level of nutrient impairment of the Outstanding 23 Florida Spring in which the project is located. 24 (b) The quantity of pollutants, particularly total 25 nitrogen, the project is estimated to remove from an Outstanding 26 Florida Spring with an adopted nutrient total maximum daily 27 load. 28 (c) The flow necessary to restore the Outstanding Florida 29 Spring to its adopted minimum flow or minimum water level. 30 (d) The anticipated impact the project will have on 31 restoring or increasing water flow or water level. 32 (e) The amount of matching funds for the project that will 33 be provided by the entities responsible for implementing the 34 project. 35 (f) Whether the project is located in a rural area of 36 critical state concern, as defined in s. 288.0656, with 37 preference given to the local government responsible for 38 implementing the project. 39 (g) For multiple-year projects, whether the project has 40 funding sources that are identified and assured through the 41 expected completion date of the project. 42 (h) The cost of the project and the length of time it will 43 take to complete relative to its expected benefits. 44 (i) Whether the entities responsible for implementing the 45 project, since July 1, 2009, have used their own funds for 46 projects to improve water quality or conserve water use within a 47 springshed or spring protection and management zone of an 48 Outstanding Florida Spring, with preference given to those 49 entities that have expended such funds. 50 51 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================ 52 And the title is amended as follows: 53 Delete lines 648 - 649 54 and insert: 55 373.809, F.S.;