Florida Senate - 2014 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. CS for CS for SB 1634 Ì674026#Î674026 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House . . . Floor: WD . 04/30/2014 09:11 AM . ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— Senator Soto moved the following: 1 Senate Amendment (with directory and title amendments) 2 3 Between lines 1799 and 1800 4 insert: 5 (4) Two or more developments, represented by their owners 6 or developers to be separate developments, shall be aggregated 7 and treated as a single development under this chapter when they 8 are determined to be part of a unified plan of development and 9 are physically proximate to one other. 10 (c) Aggregation is not applicable when the following 11 circumstances and provisions of this chapter are applicable: 12 1. Developments which are otherwise subject to aggregation 13 with a development of regional impact which has received 14 approval through the issuance of a final development order shall 15 not be aggregated with the approved development of regional 16 impact. However, nothing contained in this subparagraph shall 17 preclude the state land planning agency from evaluating an 18 allegedly separate development as a substantial deviation 19 pursuant to s. 380.06(19) or as an independent development of 20 regional impact. 21 2. Two or more developments, each of which is independently 22 a development of regional impact that has or will obtain a 23 development order pursuant to s. 380.06. 24 3. Completion of any development that has been vested 25 pursuant to s. 380.05 or s. 380.06, including vested rights 26 arising out of agreements entered into with the state land 27 planning agency for purposes of resolving vested rights issues. 28 Development-of-regional-impact review of additions to vested 29 developments of regional impact shall not include review of the 30 impacts resulting from the vested portions of the development. 31 4. The developments sought to be aggregated were authorized 32 to commence development prior to September 1, 1988, and could 33 not have been required to be aggregated under the law existing 34 prior to that date. 35 5. Any development that qualifies for an exemption under s. 36 380.06 (29). 37 38 ====== D I R E C T O R Y C L A U S E A M E N D M E N T ====== 39 And the directory clause is amended as follows: 40 Delete lines 1783 - 1784 41 and insert: 42 Section 38. Paragraph (g) of subsection (3) and paragraph 43 (c) of subsection (4) of section 380.0651, Florida Statutes, are 44 amended to read: 45 46 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================ 47 And the title is amended as follows: 48 Delete line 96 49 and insert: 50 373.4595, and 380.06, F.S.; renaming “rural areas of 51 critical economic concern” as “rural areas of 52 opportunity”; amending s. 380.0651, F.S.; renaming 53 “rural areas of critical economic concern” as “rural 54 areas of opportunity”; adding a circumstance under 55 which the requirement that two or more developments be 56 aggregated and treated as a single development is 57 inapplicable; amending ss. 985.686 and 1011.76,