Florida Senate - 2014 SENATOR AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for SB 1634
Ì674026#Î674026
LEGISLATIVE ACTION
Senate . House
.
.
.
Floor: WD .
04/30/2014 09:11 AM .
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Senator Soto moved the following:
1 Senate Amendment (with directory and title amendments)
2
3 Between lines 1799 and 1800
4 insert:
5 (4) Two or more developments, represented by their owners
6 or developers to be separate developments, shall be aggregated
7 and treated as a single development under this chapter when they
8 are determined to be part of a unified plan of development and
9 are physically proximate to one other.
10 (c) Aggregation is not applicable when the following
11 circumstances and provisions of this chapter are applicable:
12 1. Developments which are otherwise subject to aggregation
13 with a development of regional impact which has received
14 approval through the issuance of a final development order shall
15 not be aggregated with the approved development of regional
16 impact. However, nothing contained in this subparagraph shall
17 preclude the state land planning agency from evaluating an
18 allegedly separate development as a substantial deviation
19 pursuant to s. 380.06(19) or as an independent development of
20 regional impact.
21 2. Two or more developments, each of which is independently
22 a development of regional impact that has or will obtain a
23 development order pursuant to s. 380.06.
24 3. Completion of any development that has been vested
25 pursuant to s. 380.05 or s. 380.06, including vested rights
26 arising out of agreements entered into with the state land
27 planning agency for purposes of resolving vested rights issues.
28 Development-of-regional-impact review of additions to vested
29 developments of regional impact shall not include review of the
30 impacts resulting from the vested portions of the development.
31 4. The developments sought to be aggregated were authorized
32 to commence development prior to September 1, 1988, and could
33 not have been required to be aggregated under the law existing
34 prior to that date.
35 5. Any development that qualifies for an exemption under s.
36 380.06 (29).
37
38 ====== D I R E C T O R Y C L A U S E A M E N D M E N T ======
39 And the directory clause is amended as follows:
40 Delete lines 1783 - 1784
41 and insert:
42 Section 38. Paragraph (g) of subsection (3) and paragraph
43 (c) of subsection (4) of section 380.0651, Florida Statutes, are
44 amended to read:
45
46 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================
47 And the title is amended as follows:
48 Delete line 96
49 and insert:
50 373.4595, and 380.06, F.S.; renaming “rural areas of
51 critical economic concern” as “rural areas of
52 opportunity”; amending s. 380.0651, F.S.; renaming
53 “rural areas of critical economic concern” as “rural
54 areas of opportunity”; adding a circumstance under
55 which the requirement that two or more developments be
56 aggregated and treated as a single development is
57 inapplicable; amending ss. 985.686 and 1011.76,