Florida Senate - 2014                          SENATOR AMENDMENT
       Bill No. CS for SB 1642
       
       
       
       
       
       
                                Ì8645162Î864516                         
       
                              LEGISLATIVE ACTION                        
                    Senate             .             House              
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                Floor: 3/AD/2R         .                                
             04/03/2014 05:37 PM       .                                
       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————




       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
       
    1         Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
    2  
    3         Delete lines 832 - 859
    4  and insert:
    5         Section 9. Present subsections (9) and (10) of section
    6  1008.22, Florida Statutes, are renumbered as subsections (10)
    7  and (11), respectively, and a new subsection (9) is added to
    8  that section, to read:
    9         1008.22 Student assessment program for public schools.—
   10         (9) CHILD WITH MEDICAL COMPLEXITY.—In addition to the
   11  exemption option provided for under s. 1008.212, effective July
   12  1, 2014, a child with a medical complexity may be exempt from
   13  participating in statewide, standardized assessments, including
   14  the Florida Alternate Assessment (FAA), pursuant to the
   15  provisions of this subsection.
   16         (a) Definition of child with medical complexity. A child
   17  with a medical complexity means a child who, based upon medical
   18  documentation from a physician licensed under chapter 458, is
   19  medically fragile and needs intensive care due to a condition
   20  such as congenital or acquired multisystem disease; has a severe
   21  neurological or cognitive disorder with marked functional
   22  impairment; or is technology dependent for activities of daily
   23  living; and lacks the capacity to take or perform on an
   24  assessment.
   25         (b) Exemption options. If the parent consents in writing,
   26  and the IEP team determines that the child should not be
   27  assessed based upon medical documentation that the child meets
   28  the definition of a child with medical complexity, then the
   29  parent may choose one of the following three assessment
   30  exemption options.
   31         1. One-year exemption approved by the district school
   32  superintendent. If the superintendent is provided written
   33  documentation of parental consent and appropriate medical
   34  documentation to support the IEP team’s determination that the
   35  child is a child with medical complexity, then the
   36  superintendent may approve a one-year exemption from all
   37  statewide, standardized assessments, including the FAA. The
   38  superintendent shall report annually to the district school
   39  board and the Commissioner of Education the number of students
   40  who are identified as a child with medical complexity who are
   41  not participating in the assessment program.
   42         2. One- to three-year exemption approved by the
   43  Commissioner of Education. If the commissioner is provided
   44  written documentation of parental consent; district school
   45  superintendent approval; the IEP team’s determination that the
   46  child is a child with medical complexity based upon appropriate
   47  medical documentation; and all medical documentation, then the
   48  commissioner may exempt the child from all statewide,
   49  standardized assessments, including the FAA, for up to three
   50  years. The State Board of Education shall adopt rules to
   51  administer this subparagraph which must expedite the process by
   52  which exemptions are reviewed and approved and which demonstrate
   53  the utmost compassion and consideration for meeting the parent’s
   54  and child’s needs.
   55         3. Permanent exemption approved by the Commissioner of
   56  Education. If the commissioner is provided written documentation
   57  of parental consent; district school superintendent approval of
   58  a permanent exemption; the IEP team’s determination that the
   59  child is a child with medical complexity based upon appropriate
   60  medical documentation and that a permanent exemption is
   61  appropriate; and all medical documentation, then the
   62  commissioner may approve a permanent exemption from all
   63  statewide, standardized assessments, including the FAA. The
   64  State Board of Education shall adopt rules to administer this
   65  subparagraph which must expedite the process by which exemptions
   66  are reviewed and approved and which demonstrate the utmost
   67  compassion and consideration for meeting the parent’s and
   68  child’s needs.
   69         (c) Reporting requirements. The Commissioner of Education
   70  shall annually report to the Legislature data, by district,
   71  related to the implementation of this subsection at the same
   72  time as results are reported regarding student performance on
   73  statewide, standardized assessments.
   74  
   75  ================= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T ================
   76  And the title is amended as follows:
   77         Delete lines 25 - 31
   78  and insert:
   79         correcting cross-references; amending s. 1008.22,
   80         F.S.; providing that a child with a medical complexity
   81         may be exempt from participating in statewide,
   82         standardized assessments under specified
   83         circumstances; defining the term “child with a medical
   84         complexity”; authorizing a parent to choose assessment
   85         exemption options; specifying the assessment exemption
   86         options; requiring the Commissioner of Education to
   87         report to the Legislature regarding the implementation
   88         of the exemption; providing an