Florida Senate - 2014                          SENATOR AMENDMENT
       Bill No. CS/HB 7023, 1st Eng.
       
       
       
       
       
       
                                Ì877478cÎ877478                         
       
                              LEGISLATIVE ACTION                        
                    Senate             .             House              
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
               Floor: 1f/RE/2R         .                                
             05/01/2014 03:19 PM       .                                
       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————




       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
       Senator Soto moved the following:
       
    1         Senate Amendment to Amendment (494350) (with directory and
    2  title amendments)
    3  
    4         Between lines 1699 and 1700
    5  insert:
    6         (4) Two or more developments, represented by their owners
    7  or developers to be separate developments, shall be aggregated
    8  and treated as a single development under this chapter when they
    9  are determined to be part of a unified plan of development and
   10  are physically proximate to one other.
   11         (c) Aggregation is not applicable when the following
   12  circumstances and provisions of this chapter are applicable:
   13         1. Developments which are otherwise subject to aggregation
   14  with a development of regional impact which has received
   15  approval through the issuance of a final development order shall
   16  not be aggregated with the approved development of regional
   17  impact. However, nothing contained in this subparagraph shall
   18  preclude the state land planning agency from evaluating an
   19  allegedly separate development as a substantial deviation
   20  pursuant to s. 380.06(19) or as an independent development of
   21  regional impact.
   22         2. Two or more developments, each of which is independently
   23  a development of regional impact that has or will obtain a
   24  development order pursuant to s. 380.06.
   25         3. Completion of any development that has been vested
   26  pursuant to s. 380.05 or s. 380.06, including vested rights
   27  arising out of agreements entered into with the state land
   28  planning agency for purposes of resolving vested rights issues.
   29  Development-of-regional-impact review of additions to vested
   30  developments of regional impact shall not include review of the
   31  impacts resulting from the vested portions of the development.
   32         4. The developments sought to be aggregated were authorized
   33  to commence development prior to September 1, 1988, and could
   34  not have been required to be aggregated under the law existing
   35  prior to that date.
   36         5. Any development that qualifies for an exemption under s.
   37  380.06(29).
   38  
   39  ====== D I R E C T O R Y  C L A U S E  A M E N D M E N T ======
   40  And the directory clause is amended as follows:
   41         Delete lines 1683 - 1684
   42  and insert:
   43         Section 38. Paragraph (g) of subsection (3) and paragraph
   44  (c) of subsection (4) of section 380.0651, Florida Statutes, are
   45  amended to read:
   46  
   47  ================= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T ================
   48  And the title is amended as follows:
   49         Delete line 1860
   50  and insert:
   51         373.4595, and 380.06, F.S.; renaming “rural areas of
   52         critical economic concern” as “rural areas of
   53         opportunity”; amending s. 380.0651, F.S.; renaming
   54         “rural areas of critical economic concern” as “rural
   55         areas of opportunity”; adding a circumstance under
   56         which the requirement that two or more developments be
   57         aggregated and treated as a single development is
   58         inapplicable; amending ss. 985.686 and 1011.76,