Florida Senate - 2016 SENATOR AMENDMENT Bill No. CS/CS/CS/HB 491, 1st Eng. Ì2917622Î291762 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House . . . Floor: 1/R/2R . Floor: SENAT/RC 03/11/2016 05:05 PM . 03/11/2016 10:38 AM ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— Senator Hays moved the following: 1 Senate Amendment (with directory and title amendments) 2 3 Between lines 173 and 174 4 insert: 5 (7) The commission shall determine the reasonableness of 6 rate case expenses and shall disallow all rate case expenses 7 determined to be unreasonable. No rate case expense determined 8 to be unreasonable shall be paid by a consumer. 9 (a) In determining the reasonable level of rate case 10 expense, the commission shall consider the following criteria as 11 a basis for disallowing such rate case expense when the criteria 12 are specifically raised in writing by the Public Counsel, an 13 intervenor, or commission staff: 14 1. The extent to which a utility has utilized or failed to 15 utilize the provisions of paragraph (4)(a) or paragraph (4)(b). 16 2. Whether the customers have received a material benefit 17 as a result of the rate case. 18 3. The amount of time between each rate case. 19 4. The extent to which, at the time of the initial filing, 20 the utility filed complete documentation as required by 21 commission rule, including, but not limited to, minimum filing 22 requirements. 23 5. Whether the utility’s rate case filing seeks 24 preferential benefits to shareholders, owners, or nonregulated 25 affiliates. 26 6. The proportion of any rate increase approved by the 27 commission as compared to the amount initially requested by the 28 utility. 29 7. The amount of overall rate case expense incurred and 30 requested as compared to the amount of rate increase approved by 31 the commission. 32 8. The utility management’s culpability in causing any 33 deficiencies in the quality of service provided by the utility. 34 9.andSuch other criteria as the commissionitmay 35 establish by rule. 36 (b) If any of the criteria specified under paragraph (a) 37 are specifically contested in an evidentiary proceeding, the 38 commission shall make specific findings of fact, supported by 39 competent, substantial evidence, for each criterion and the 40 extent to which each criterion benefits the customer. The 41 commission may allocate the benefits between the customers and 42 the shareholders, owners, or affiliates accordingly and may 43 disallow rate case expense in accordance with the specific 44 findings of fact. 45 46 ====== D I R E C T O R Y C L A U S E A M E N D M E N T ====== 47 And the directory clause is amended as follows: 48 Delete line 68 49 and insert: 50 (4) and subsection (7) are amended, subsection (8) is renumbered 51 as subsection (10), 52 53 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================ 54 And the title is amended as follows: 55 Delete line 21 56 and insert: 57 specified expense items; requiring the commission to 58 consider certain criteria in determining the 59 reasonableness of rate case expenses, when 60 specifically raised in writing by certain parties; 61 specifying standards for evidentiary proceedings 62 involving challenges to such criteria; authorizing the 63 commission to allocate benefits between the customers 64 and shareholders, owners, or affiliates and to 65 disallow rate case expense under certain 66 circumstances; specifying the time period