Florida Senate - 2017 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. CS for SB 582 Ì686042ÈÎ686042 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House Comm: RCS . 03/28/2017 . . . . ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— The Committee on Judiciary (Latvala) recommended the following: 1 Senate Amendment (with title amendment) 2 3 Delete lines 31 - 96 4 and insert: 5 the Legislature. The department, by way of departmental 6 officials who are not active market participants, shall review 7 each final board decision for anticompetitive conduct and, based 8 on its findings, shall issue an order constituting state action 9 approving, modifying, or voiding the decision. The department’s 10 anticompetitive review constitutes a limited legal review and 11 its resulting determination is not subject to legal challenge. 12 For purposes of this paragraph, the term “final board decisions” 13 includes final orders for disciplinary actions, declaratory 14 statements, actions concerning unlicensed activity, licensure 15 application denials, and rulemaking. 16 (b) Legal costs for defense of antitrust actions brought 17 against boards or board members shall be paid out of the 18 Professional Regulation Trust Fund. 19 Section 2. Subsection (12) is added to section 456.004, 20 Florida Statutes, to read: 21 456.004 Department; powers and duties.—The department, for 22 the professions under its jurisdiction, shall: 23 (12)(a) Determine whether final board decisions constitute 24 anticompetitive conduct that does not promote state policy, does 25 not comport with the standards established by the Legislature, 26 or does not comport with the authority delegated to a board by 27 the Legislature. The department, by way of departmental 28 officials who are not active market participants, shall review 29 each final board decision for anticompetitive conduct and, based 30 on its findings, shall issue an order constituting state action 31 approving, modifying, or voiding the decision. The department’s 32 anticompetitive review constitutes a limited legal review and 33 its resulting determination is not subject to legal challenge. 34 For purposes of this paragraph, the term “final board decisions” 35 includes final orders for disciplinary actions, declaratory 36 statements, actions concerning unlicensed activity, licensure 37 application denials, and rulemaking. 38 (b) Legal costs for defense of antitrust actions brought 39 against boards or board members shall be paid out of the Medical 40 Quality Assurance Trust Fund. 41 Section 3. Paragraph (e) is added to subsection (7) of 42 section 497.103, Florida Statutes, to read: 43 497.103 Authority of board and department; Chief Financial 44 Officer recommendations.— 45 (7) ACTIONS BY BOARD AND DEPARTMENT.— 46 (e)1. The department shall determine whether final board 47 decisions constitute anticompetitive conduct that does not 48 promote state policy, does not comport with the standards 49 established by the Legislature, or does not comport with the 50 authority delegated to a board by the Legislature. The 51 department, by way of departmental officials who are not active 52 market participants, shall review each final board decision for 53 anticompetitive conduct and, based on its findings, shall issue 54 an order constituting state action approving, modifying, or 55 voiding the decision. The department’s anticompetitive review 56 constitutes a limited legal review and its resulting 57 determination is not subject to legal challenge. For purposes of 58 this paragraph, the term “final board decisions” includes final 59 orders for disciplinary actions, declaratory statements, actions 60 concerning unlicensed activity, licensure application denials, 61 and rulemaking. 62 2. Legal costs for defense of antitrust actions brought 63 against boards or board members shall be paid out of the 64 Regulatory Trust Fund. 65 66 ================= T I T L E A M E N D M E N T ================ 67 And the title is amended as follows: 68 Delete lines 11 - 18 69 and insert: 70 voiding each decision; specifying that the 71 departments’ anticompetitive review constitutes a 72 limited legal review and its resulting determination 73 is not subject to legal challenge; specifying actions 74 that are considered final board decisions; requiring 75 that legal costs for defense of antitrust actions and 76 financial damages be paid from specified accounts; 77 providing