Florida Senate - 2018 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT Bill No. CS for CS for SB 1880 Ì354542"Î354542 LEGISLATIVE ACTION Senate . House Comm: RCS . 03/01/2018 . . . . ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— The Committee on Rules (Broxson) recommended the following: 1 Senate Amendment 2 3 Delete lines 202 - 265 4 and insert: 5 and exempt in order to protect the technology systems, 6 resources, and data of the corporation. The Legislature further 7 finds that this public records exemption be given retroactive 8 application because it is remedial in nature. 9 (2)(a) The Legislature also finds that it is a public 10 necessity that portions of risk assessments, evaluations, 11 audits, and other reports of the corporation’s information 12 technology security program for its data, information, and 13 information technology resources which are held by the 14 corporation be made confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1), 15 Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Article I of the State 16 Constitution if the disclosure of such portions of records would 17 facilitate unauthorized access to or the unauthorized 18 modification, disclosure, or destruction of: 19 1. Data or information, whether physical or virtual; or 20 2. Information technology resources, which include: 21 a. Information relating to the security of the 22 corporation’s technologies, processes, and practices designed to 23 protect networks, computers, data processing software, and data 24 from attack, damage, or unauthorized access; or 25 b. Security information, whether physical or virtual, which 26 relates to the corporation’s existing or proposed information 27 technology systems. 28 (b) The Legislature finds that it is valuable, prudent, and 29 critical to the corporation to have an independent entity 30 conduct a risk assessment, an audit, or an evaluation or 31 complete a report of the corporation’s information technology 32 program or related systems. Such documents would likely include 33 an analysis of the corporation’s current information technology 34 program or systems which could clearly identify vulnerabilities 35 or gaps in current systems or processes and propose 36 recommendations to remedy identified vulnerabilities. 37 (3)(a) The Legislature further finds that it is a public 38 necessity that those portions of a public meeting which could 39 reveal information described in this section be made exempt from 40 s. 286.011, Florida Statutes, and s. 24(b), Article I of the 41 State Constitution. It is a public necessity that such meetings 42 be made exempt from the open meetings requirements in order to 43 protect the corporation’s information technology systems, 44 resources, and data. The information disclosed during portions 45 of meetings would clearly identify the corporation’s information 46 technology systems and its vulnerabilities. This disclosure 47 would jeopardize the information technology security of the 48 corporation and compromise the integrity and availability of the 49 corporation’s data and information technology resources. 50 (b) The Legislature further finds that it is a public 51 necessity that the recording and transcript of those portions of 52 meetings specified in paragraph (a) be made confidential and 53 exempt from s. 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), 54 Article I of the State Constitution unless a court determines 55 that the meeting was not restricted to the discussion of data 56 and information made confidential and exempt by this act. It is 57 a public necessity that the resulting recordings and transcripts 58 be made confidential and exempt from the public records 59 requirements in order to protect the corporation’s information 60 technology systems, resources, and data. The disclosure of such 61 recordings and transcripts would clearly identify the 62 corporation’s information technology systems and its 63 vulnerabilities. This disclosure would jeopardize the 64 information technology security of the corporation and 65 compromise the integrity and availability of the corporation’s 66 data and information technology resources. 67 (c) The Legislature further finds that this public records 68 exemption must be given retroactive