Florida Senate - 2018 COMMITTEE AMENDMENT
Bill No. CS for CS for SB 1880
Ì354542"Î354542
LEGISLATIVE ACTION
Senate . House
Comm: RCS .
03/01/2018 .
.
.
.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
The Committee on Rules (Broxson) recommended the following:
1 Senate Amendment
2
3 Delete lines 202 - 265
4 and insert:
5 and exempt in order to protect the technology systems,
6 resources, and data of the corporation. The Legislature further
7 finds that this public records exemption be given retroactive
8 application because it is remedial in nature.
9 (2)(a) The Legislature also finds that it is a public
10 necessity that portions of risk assessments, evaluations,
11 audits, and other reports of the corporation’s information
12 technology security program for its data, information, and
13 information technology resources which are held by the
14 corporation be made confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1),
15 Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a), Article I of the State
16 Constitution if the disclosure of such portions of records would
17 facilitate unauthorized access to or the unauthorized
18 modification, disclosure, or destruction of:
19 1. Data or information, whether physical or virtual; or
20 2. Information technology resources, which include:
21 a. Information relating to the security of the
22 corporation’s technologies, processes, and practices designed to
23 protect networks, computers, data processing software, and data
24 from attack, damage, or unauthorized access; or
25 b. Security information, whether physical or virtual, which
26 relates to the corporation’s existing or proposed information
27 technology systems.
28 (b) The Legislature finds that it is valuable, prudent, and
29 critical to the corporation to have an independent entity
30 conduct a risk assessment, an audit, or an evaluation or
31 complete a report of the corporation’s information technology
32 program or related systems. Such documents would likely include
33 an analysis of the corporation’s current information technology
34 program or systems which could clearly identify vulnerabilities
35 or gaps in current systems or processes and propose
36 recommendations to remedy identified vulnerabilities.
37 (3)(a) The Legislature further finds that it is a public
38 necessity that those portions of a public meeting which could
39 reveal information described in this section be made exempt from
40 s. 286.011, Florida Statutes, and s. 24(b), Article I of the
41 State Constitution. It is a public necessity that such meetings
42 be made exempt from the open meetings requirements in order to
43 protect the corporation’s information technology systems,
44 resources, and data. The information disclosed during portions
45 of meetings would clearly identify the corporation’s information
46 technology systems and its vulnerabilities. This disclosure
47 would jeopardize the information technology security of the
48 corporation and compromise the integrity and availability of the
49 corporation’s data and information technology resources.
50 (b) The Legislature further finds that it is a public
51 necessity that the recording and transcript of those portions of
52 meetings specified in paragraph (a) be made confidential and
53 exempt from s. 119.07(1), Florida Statutes, and s. 24(a),
54 Article I of the State Constitution unless a court determines
55 that the meeting was not restricted to the discussion of data
56 and information made confidential and exempt by this act. It is
57 a public necessity that the resulting recordings and transcripts
58 be made confidential and exempt from the public records
59 requirements in order to protect the corporation’s information
60 technology systems, resources, and data. The disclosure of such
61 recordings and transcripts would clearly identify the
62 corporation’s information technology systems and its
63 vulnerabilities. This disclosure would jeopardize the
64 information technology security of the corporation and
65 compromise the integrity and availability of the corporation’s
66 data and information technology resources.
67 (c) The Legislature further finds that this public records
68 exemption must be given retroactive