Florida Senate - 2021                        COMMITTEE AMENDMENT
       Bill No. CS for SB 932
       
       
       
       
       
       
                                Ì735846IÎ735846                         
       
                              LEGISLATIVE ACTION                        
                    Senate             .             House              
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————




       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
       The Committee on Rules (Wright) recommended the following:
       
    1         Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
    2  
    3         Delete lines 27 - 77
    4  and insert:
    5  responsibilities, and joys, of childrearing. Except as otherwise
    6  provided in this paragraph, there is no presumption for or
    7  against the father or mother of the child or for or against any
    8  specific time-sharing schedule when creating or modifying the
    9  parenting plan of the child.
   10         2. The court shall order that the parental responsibility
   11  for a minor child be shared by both parents unless the court
   12  finds that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental
   13  to the child. The following evidence creates a rebuttable
   14  presumption of detriment to the child: that
   15         a. A parent has been convicted of a misdemeanor of the
   16  first degree or higher involving domestic violence, as defined
   17  in s. 741.28 and chapter 775;, or
   18         b.A parent meets the criteria of s. 39.806(1)(d); or
   19         c.A parent has been convicted of or had adjudication
   20  withheld for an offense enumerated in s. 943.0435(1)(h)1.a., and
   21  at the time of the offense:
   22         (I)The parent was 18 years of age or older.
   23         (II)The victim was under 18 years of age or the parent
   24  believed the victim to be under 18 years of age ,creates a
   25  rebuttable presumption of detriment to the child.
   26  
   27  If the presumption is not rebutted after the convicted parent is
   28  advised by the court that the presumption exists, shared
   29  parental responsibility, including time-sharing with the child,
   30  and decisions made regarding the child, may not be granted to
   31  the convicted parent. However, the convicted parent is not
   32  relieved of any obligation to provide financial support. If the
   33  court determines that shared parental responsibility would be
   34  detrimental to the child, it may order sole parental
   35  responsibility and make such arrangements for time-sharing as
   36  specified in the parenting plan as will best protect the child
   37  or abused spouse from further harm. Whether or not there is a
   38  conviction of any offense of domestic violence or child abuse or
   39  the existence of an injunction for protection against domestic
   40  violence, the court shall consider evidence of domestic violence
   41  or child abuse as evidence of detriment to the child.
   42         3.a. In ordering shared parental responsibility, the court
   43  may consider the expressed desires of the parents and may grant
   44  to one party the ultimate responsibility over specific aspects
   45  of the child’s welfare or may divide those responsibilities
   46  between the parties based on the best interests of the child.
   47  Areas of responsibility may include education, health care, and
   48  any other responsibilities that the court finds unique to a
   49  particular family.
   50         4.b. The court shall order sole parental responsibility for
   51  a minor child to one parent, with or without time-sharing with
   52  the other parent if it is in the best interests of the minor
   53  child.
   54         5.There is a rebuttable presumption against granting time
   55  sharing with a minor child if a parent has been convicted of or
   56  had adjudication withheld for an offense enumerated in s.
   57  943.0435(1)(h)1.a., and at the time of the offense:
   58         a.The parent was 18 years of age or older.
   59         b.The victim was under 18 years of age or the parent
   60  believed the victim to be under 18 years of age.
   61  
   62  A parent may rebut the presumption upon a specific finding in
   63  writing by the court that the parent poses no significant risk
   64  of harm to the child and that time-sharing is in the best
   65  interests of the minor child. If the presumption is rebutted,
   66  the court shall consider all time-sharing factors in subsection
   67  (3) when developing a time-sharing schedule.
   68         6.3. Access to records and information pertaining to a
   69  
   70  ================= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T ================
   71  And the title is amended as follows:
   72         Delete lines 2 - 7
   73  and insert:
   74         An act relating to parenting and time-sharing of a
   75         minor child for a convicted parent; amending s. 61.13,
   76         F.S.; creating a rebuttable presumption against shared
   77         parental responsibility and time-sharing with a minor
   78         child for certain parents who have been convicted of
   79         or had adjudication withheld for a specified offense;
   80         providing an effective date.