Florida Senate - 2026                        COMMITTEE AMENDMENT
       Bill No. SB 208
       
       
       
       
       
       
                                Ì378440"Î378440                         
       
                              LEGISLATIVE ACTION                        
                    Senate             .             House              
                  Comm: RCS            .                                
                  01/12/2026           .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
                                       .                                
       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————




       —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
       The Committee on Judiciary (McClain) recommended the following:
       
    1         Senate Amendment (with title amendment)
    2  
    3         Delete everything after the enacting clause
    4  and insert:
    5         Section 1. Present subsection (9) of section 125.022,
    6  Florida Statutes, is redesignated as subsection (10), and a new
    7  subsection (9) is added to that section, to read:
    8         125.022 Development permits and orders.—
    9         (9) The amount of any application fee associated with a
   10  development permit or development order must reasonably relate
   11  to the direct and reasonable indirect costs associated with the
   12  review, processing, and final disposition of the application and
   13  must be published on the county’s fee schedule. The fee may not
   14  be based on a percentage of construction costs, site costs, or
   15  project valuation.
   16         Section 2. Present subsection (9) of section 166.033,
   17  Florida Statutes, is redesignated as subsection (10), and a new
   18  subsection (9) is added to that section, to read:
   19         166.033 Development permits and orders.—
   20         (9) The amount of any application fee associated with a
   21  development permit or development order must reasonably relate
   22  to the direct and reasonable indirect costs associated with the
   23  review, processing, and final disposition of the application and
   24  must be published on the municipality’s fee schedule. The fee
   25  may not be based on a percentage of construction costs, site
   26  costs, or project valuation.
   27         Section 3. Subsection (7) is added to section 163.3194,
   28  Florida Statutes, to read:
   29         163.3194 Legal status of comprehensive plan.—
   30         (7)(a) Local government comprehensive plans and land
   31  development regulations must include factors for assessing the
   32  compatibility of allowable residential uses within a residential
   33  zoning district and future land use category. Such factors may
   34  include intensity, density, scale, building size, mass, bulk,
   35  height and orientation, lot coverage, lot size and
   36  configuration, architectural style, permeability, screening,
   37  buffers, setbacks, stepbacks, transitional areas, signage,
   38  traffic and pedestrian circulation and access, and operational
   39  impacts, such as noise, odor, and lighting.
   40         (b) Land development regulations must incorporate objective
   41  design standards or other measures for mitigating or minimizing
   42  potential incompatibility.
   43         (c)1. Before recommending denial of an application for
   44  rezoning, subdivision, or site plan approval on compatibility
   45  grounds, local government staff must identify with specificity
   46  each area of incompatibility and may recommend mitigation
   47  measures to the applicant.
   48         2.If the applicant has proposed mitigation measures, the
   49  local government may not deny an application on compatibility
   50  grounds unless the denial includes written findings stating that
   51  the proposed mitigation measures are inadequate and that no
   52  feasible mitigation measures exist.
   53         3.A denial of an application on compatibility grounds must
   54  specify with particularity the area or areas of incompatibility,
   55  including applicable standards and an explanation of any
   56  mitigation measures considered and declined by the applicant, or
   57  the basis for determining that no feasible mitigation measures
   58  exist. References to “community character” or “neighborhood
   59  feel” are not sufficient in and of themselves to support a
   60  denial of an application on compatibility grounds.
   61         4. A local government’s approval of an application may
   62  include requirements or conditions to mitigate or minimize
   63  compatibility concerns.
   64         (d) This subsection does not apply to any of the following:
   65         1. Compatibility between uses in different future land use
   66  categories, including rural, agricultural, conservation, open
   67  space, mixed-use, industrial, or commercial use.
   68         2. Applications for development within planned unit
   69  developments or master planned communities.
   70         3. Applications for development within historic districts
   71  designated before January 1, 2026.
   72         (e) This section does not require approval of an
   73  application that is otherwise inconsistent with the applicable
   74  local government comprehensive plan or land development
   75  regulations.
   76         Section 4. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
   77  
   78  ================= T I T L E  A M E N D M E N T ================
   79  And the title is amended as follows:
   80         Delete everything before the enacting clause
   81  and insert:
   82                        A bill to be entitled                      
   83         An act relating to land use and development
   84         regulations; amending ss. 125.022 and 166.033, F.S.;
   85         requiring that the amount of certain application fees
   86         reasonably relate to certain costs; requiring that
   87         such fees be published on the county’s or
   88         municipality’s fee schedule, respectively; requiring
   89         that such fees not be based on certain costs or
   90         valuations; amending s. 163.3194, F.S.; requiring that
   91         local government comprehensive plans and land
   92         development regulations include factors for assessing
   93         the compatibility of certain residential uses;
   94         requiring that land development regulations
   95         incorporate certain objective standards or other
   96         measures for mitigating or minimizing potential
   97         incompatibility; requiring local government staff to
   98         meet certain requirements before recommending denial
   99         of certain applications on compatibility grounds;
  100         prohibiting a local government from denying certain
  101         applications on compatibility grounds if the applicant
  102         has proposed certain measures; providing an exception;
  103         requiring that the denial of an application specify
  104         certain information; providing that a local
  105         government’s approval of an application may include
  106         certain requirements or conditions; providing
  107         applicability; providing construction; providing an
  108         effective date.