Florida Senate - 2026                               (NP)    SB 8
       
       
        
       By Senator Rodriguez
       
       
       
       
       
       40-00019-26                                              20268__
    1                        A bill to be entitled                      
    2         An act for the relief of Patricia Ermini by the Lee
    3         County Sheriff’s Office; providing for an
    4         appropriation to compensate her for injuries sustained
    5         as a result of the negligence of the Lee County
    6         Sheriff’s Office; providing a limitation on the
    7         payment of compensation and attorney fees; providing
    8         an effective date.
    9  
   10         WHEREAS, on the evening of March 23, 2012, 71-year-old
   11  Patricia Ermini spoke on the telephone with her daughter, Robin
   12  Lacasse, who found that her mother was extremely upset in the
   13  wake of her contentious and expensive divorce after a brief
   14  marriage, and
   15         WHEREAS, Ms. Lacasse suggested to her mother that she hang
   16  up, take some time to calm down, and, afterward, call her back,
   17  which her mother did; however, Ms. Lacasse missed her mother’s
   18  call, and
   19         WHEREAS, when Ms. Ermini failed to reach her daughter, she
   20  went to bed in her bedroom, which was being cooled by a window
   21  air conditioner, and
   22         WHEREAS, over the course of half an hour, Ms. Lacasse
   23  repeatedly tried to return her mother’s call, and, when her
   24  mother did not answer, Ms. Lacasse called the Lee County
   25  Sheriff’s Office (LCSO) to request that a well-being check be
   26  conducted to determine whether her mother was safe, and
   27         WHEREAS, shortly before 9 p.m., LCSO dispatch relayed the
   28  call for a well-being check to Deputy Charlene Palmese, with
   29  Deputies Richard Lisenbee and Robert Hamer also responding to
   30  the call, conveying the following information to the deputies:
   31  Ms. Ermini’s name and age; that the request for a well-being
   32  check had been initiated by Ms. Ermini’s daughter, who did not
   33  reside in Lee County and was afraid for her mother’s life; that
   34  Ms. Ermini was in the middle of a difficult divorce; that Ms.
   35  Ermini had told her daughter that she “couldn’t take it
   36  anymore”; that Ms. Ermini’s daughter was worried that Ms. Ermini
   37  might commit suicide; that Ms. Ermini had never threatened
   38  suicide before; that Ms. Ermini did not suffer from mental
   39  illness; and that Ms. Ermini had a gun and might have been
   40  drinking, and
   41         WHEREAS, at the time of the call, Deputy Lisenbee was on
   42  probation and undergoing remedial training, in part because of
   43  his demonstrated inability to control scenes or suspects through
   44  verbal commands, and he later told investigators that he could
   45  not recall receiving training in the conduct of well-being
   46  checks, and
   47         WHEREAS, Deputy Palmese had completed her field training
   48  only a few days before the call, during which she received
   49  instruction on how to respond to a well-being check, but she
   50  later told investigators that she could not recall whether, at
   51  the time of the call, she had ever actually participated in a
   52  well-being check, and
   53         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer had been to many suicide threat
   54  calls, and he made it a practice to carry his rifle when it was
   55  known that a firearm was present on the premises where the
   56  subject of the call was located, and
   57         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee, who was the first to arrive at
   58  Ms. Ermini’s home in response to the call, observed that there
   59  were no lights on in the home when he arrived and, after a brief
   60  exterior check, went to the front door, where he secured a
   61  screen door in the open position, knocked on the door, and
   62  announced, “Sheriff’s Office,” to no response, and
   63         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee determined that the front door was
   64  unlocked, opened the door, and again said, “Sheriff’s Office,”
   65  followed by “Anyone here? Anyone home?” to no response, and
   66         WHEREAS, Deputy Palmese was second to arrive, followed by
   67  Deputy Hamer, who, like the other deputies, parked out of view
   68  from inside the residence, and
   69         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer retrieved from the trunk of his
   70  vehicle his AR-15 rifle, which was equipped with a flashlight
   71  and a sighting device that allowed him to find his target more
   72  quickly and easily, and
   73         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer determined that the three deputies,
   74  all of whom were wearing dark green uniforms, should go into the
   75  residence to clear the house, and
   76         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer activated the flashlight on his
   77  rifle, and Deputy Lisenbee announced “Sheriff’s Office” once or
   78  twice more before they entered the home, after which they
   79  proceeded to move about the dark residence in silence as they
   80  cleared the living room, finally arriving at the primary
   81  bedroom, which had double doors, both of which were closed, and
   82         WHEREAS, without knocking or further announcing their
   83  presence, Deputy Lisenbee opened the right-hand bedroom door and
   84  shined his flashlight on a female, who appeared to be asleep on
   85  the bed wearing only undergarments, and
   86         WHEREAS, after Deputy Lisenbee entered the bedroom doorway,
   87  he announced, “Sheriff’s Office. Are you okay?” to which the
   88  woman responded, “Who’s there? Who’s there?,” and
   89         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee said, “Sheriff’s Office. We’re
   90  here to make sure you’re okay. Are you okay?,” and
   91         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee said that, although the woman may
   92  have sounded frightened, he did not temper his tone, nor did he
   93  ever shine his flashlight on himself to allow Ms. Ermini to see
   94  that he was, in fact, a uniformed officer, and
   95         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer said he heard Ms. Ermini say, “What
   96  are you doing here? I have a gun,” and
   97         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer later acknowledged that he didn’t
   98  know whether Ms. Ermini had heard or understood Deputy Lisenbee,
   99  yet nonetheless, he turned off the flashlight on his gun, “took
  100  the point,” and stepped in front of Deputy Lisenbee because, he
  101  said, he had more weaponry, was the senior officer on scene, and
  102  had significantly more gun range time, and
  103         WHEREAS, terrified, Ms. Ermini told the person at the
  104  doorway, whom she perceived as an intruder, to get out of her
  105  house “because [she had] a gun” and, with that, jumped up from
  106  the bed and hid behind the still-closed left-hand bedroom door,
  107  and
  108         WHEREAS, it remains unclear whether Ms. Ermini grabbed her
  109  gun as she ran to shelter behind the door, and
  110         WHEREAS, as Ms. Ermini tried to look around the bedroom
  111  door, she was shot multiple times, with Deputy Hamer firing
  112  seven rounds from his rifle through the closed bedroom door, and
  113         WHEREAS, according to the chief crime scene investigator, a
  114  bullet fired through the middle of the door struck Ms. Ermini in
  115  her left leg, shattering her femur and causing her to fall
  116  backward onto the floor; another bullet hit her in the upper
  117  right arm, leaving a portion of her upper arm missing; and a
  118  third bullet caused a graze wound across the back of her head,
  119  and
  120         WHEREAS, a wood splinter from the door lodged in her right
  121  eye, temporarily blinding her in that eye, and
  122         WHEREAS, it was less than 2 minutes from the time of entry
  123  until Ms. Ermini was shot multiple times and fell to the floor,
  124  and
  125         WHEREAS, Deputy Hamer notified dispatch of the shooting and
  126  continued to sweep the bedroom before finally delivering first
  127  aid to Ms. Ermini, whom he handcuffed because she was still
  128  alive and therefore posed a possible threat to the deputies, and
  129         WHEREAS, Lee County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were
  130  dispatched at the same time as the officers and were waiting
  131  just two blocks away, which likely saved Ms. Ermini’s life, and
  132         WHEREAS, when the lead paramedic for EMS arrived, he
  133  determined that Ms. Ermini had life-threatening injuries to the
  134  front and back of her left leg and to the front and back of her
  135  right arm, and a laceration to the back of her head just above
  136  the neckline, and
  137         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini repeatedly asked the paramedic why she
  138  had been shot, who the intruders were, and why they were in her
  139  home, and
  140         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini’s most grievous injury was the
  141  shattered femur in her left leg, and moving her caused her
  142  significant blood loss and excruciating pain, and
  143         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini was taken to Lee Memorial Hospital in
  144  critical condition and later admitted to the intensive care
  145  unit, and
  146         WHEREAS, in addition to the gunshot wounds, Ms. Ermini had
  147  numerous wounds on her face from the wood splinters from the
  148  bedroom door, and
  149         WHEREAS, an LCSO lieutenant who followed the ambulance to
  150  the hospital initially refused the emergency room doctor’s
  151  request to remove the handcuffs from Ms. Ermini; emergency room
  152  staff were told that Ms. Ermini “tried to kill a cop”; and Ms.
  153  Ermini’s family members were denied visitation, and
  154         WHEREAS, doctors were able to save Ms. Ermini’s eye with
  155  surgery, but her vision has deteriorated since the incident, and
  156         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini required multiple surgeries to repair
  157  her femur and address her wounds, including multiple skin grafts
  158  on her shoulder, and
  159         WHEREAS, after discharge, she suffered a severe septic
  160  infection that caused her tremendous pain, and the pain
  161  medications she was prescribed induced debilitating paranoia,
  162  and
  163         WHEREAS, on March 24, 2012, Sheriff Mike Scott told the
  164  news media that Ms. Ermini shot at deputies who had responded to
  165  a well-being check and that they returned fire, which directly
  166  contradicts Deputy Hamer’s statement, in which he indicated that
  167  he shot first, and
  168         WHEREAS, on March 29, 2012, Ms. Ermini was arrested in the
  169  intensive care unit on two counts of aggravated assault on a law
  170  enforcement officer, which the state attorney declined to
  171  prosecute, and
  172         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini was an emergency room nurse in South
  173  Florida for many years and had worked with law enforcement
  174  officers, no evidence was ever produced that she had any animus
  175  toward law enforcement officers, and it is still disputed that
  176  Ms. Ermini’s weapon was discharged during the encounter, and
  177         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini remained hospitalized for about 30 days
  178  and has never fully recovered from her injuries, and
  179         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini continues to suffer acute pain,
  180  fatigue, and a limited range of motion due to the gunshot wound
  181  to her upper arm, all of which impair her ability to accomplish
  182  many of the activities of daily living, and she also suffers
  183  from debilitating posttraumatic stress disorder, and
  184         WHEREAS, Ms. Ermini was forced to sell her home because she
  185  cannot afford in-home assistance, and
  186         WHEREAS, Deputy Lisenbee and Deputy Hamer were terminated
  187  by the LCSO shortly after the incident, the latter for “conduct
  188  unbecoming,” and
  189         WHEREAS, in November 2015, Ms. Ermini filed suit against
  190  LCSO and the individual deputies involved in the call, and
  191         WHEREAS, on January 12, 2018, after a 4-day trial, a jury
  192  that included a retired law enforcement officer awarded $1
  193  million in damages to Ms. Ermini for her pain and suffering, and
  194         WHEREAS, after apportionment of 75 percent of the fault to
  195  LCSO, a judgment was entered in Ms. Ermini’s favor for $750,000,
  196  and
  197         WHEREAS, ultimately, after numerous procedural attempts by
  198  LCSO to overturn the judgment, the United States Court of
  199  Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed the judgment of the United
  200  States District Court in Ms. Ermini’s favor, and on or about
  201  December 9, 2019, the Florida Sheriffs Risk Management Fund, on
  202  behalf of its insured, the Lee County Sheriff’s Office, paid the
  203  statutory limit of $200,000 in damages under section 768.28,
  204  Florida Statutes, and
  205         WHEREAS, this claim bill is for recovery of the excess
  206  judgment in the amount of $550,000, plus interest and taxable
  207  trial costs and appellate costs awarded to Ms. Ermini in the
  208  amount of $76,769.93, for a total claim of $626,769.93, NOW,
  209  THEREFORE,
  210  
  211  Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
  212  
  213         Section 1. The facts stated in the preamble to this act are
  214  found and declared to be true.
  215         Section 2. The Lee County Sheriff’s Office is authorized
  216  and directed to appropriate from funds not otherwise encumbered
  217  and to draw a warrant in the sum of $626,769.93 payable to
  218  Patricia Ermini as compensation for injuries and damages
  219  sustained.
  220         Section 3. The amount paid by the Lee County Sheriff’s
  221  Office, pursuant to s. 768.28, Florida Statutes, and the amount
  222  awarded under this act are intended to provide the sole
  223  compensation for all present and future claims arising out of
  224  the factual situation described in this act which resulted in
  225  injuries and damages to Patricia Ermini. The total amount paid
  226  for attorney fees relating to this claim may not exceed 25
  227  percent of the total amount awarded under this act.
  228         Section 4. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law.