The Florida Senate

“Allowance” means a credit issued by the department through allotments or auction which represents an authorization to emit specific amounts of greenhouse gases, as further defined in department rule.

“Cap and trade” or “emissions trading” means an administrative approach used to control pollution by providing a limit on total allowable emissions, providing for allowances to emit pollutants, and providing for the transfer of the allowances among pollutant sources as a means of compliance with emission limits.

“Greenhouse gas” or “GHG” means carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases such as hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride.

“Leakage” means the offset of emission abatement that is achieved in one location subject to emission control regulation by increased emissions in unregulated locations.

“Major emitter” means an electric utility regulated under this chapter.

A statewide limit or cap on the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by major emitters.

Methods, requirements, and conditions for allocating the cap among major emitters.

Methods, requirements, and conditions for emissions allowances and the process for issuing emissions allowances.

The relationship between allowances and the specific amounts of greenhouse gas emissions they represent.

The length of allowance periods and the time over which entities must account for emissions and surrender allowances equal to emissions.

The timeline of allowances from the initiation of the program through to 2050.

A process for the trade of allowances between major emitters, including a registry, tracking, or accounting system for such trades.

Cost containment mechanisms to reduce price and cost risks associated with the electric generation market in this state. Cost containment mechanisms to be considered for inclusion in the rules include, but are not limited to:

In considering cost containment mechanisms for inclusion in the rules, the department shall evaluate the anticipated overall effect of each mechanism on the abatement of greenhouse gas emissions and on electricity ratepayers and the benefits and costs of each to the state’s economy, and shall also consider the interrelationships between the mechanisms under consideration.

A process to allow the department to exercise its authority to discourage leakage of GHG emissions to neighboring states attributable to the implementation of this program.

Provisions for a trial period on the trading of allowances before full implementation of a trading system.

The overall cost-effectiveness of the cap-and-trade system in combination with other policies and measures in meeting statewide targets.

Minimizing the administrative burden to the state of implementing, monitoring, and enforcing the program.

Minimizing the administrative burden on entities covered under the cap.

The impacts on electricity prices for consumers.

The specific benefits to the state’s economy for early adoption of a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases in the context of federal climate change legislation and the development of new international compacts.

The specific benefits to the state’s economy associated with the creation and sale of emissions offsets from economic sectors outside of the emissions cap.

The potential effects on leakage if economic activity relocates out of the state.

The effectiveness of the combination of measures in meeting identified targets.

The implications for near-term periods of long-term targets specified in the overall policy.

The overall costs and benefits of a cap-and-trade system to the state economy.

How to moderate impacts on low-income consumers that result from energy price increases.

Consistency of the program with other state and possible federal efforts.

The feasibility and cost-effectiveness of extending the program scope as broadly as possible among emitting activities and sinks in Florida.

Evaluation of the conditions under which Florida should consider linking its trading system to the systems of other states or other countries and how that might be affected by the potential inclusion in the rule of a safety valve.

The overall cost-effectiveness of the proposed cap-and-trade system in combination with other policies and measures in meeting statewide targets.

The administrative burden to the state of implementing, monitoring, and enforcing the program.

The administrative burden on entities covered under the cap.

The impacts on electricity prices for consumers.

The specific benefits to the state’s economy for early adoption of a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases in the context of federal climate change legislation and the development of new international compacts.

The specific benefits to the state’s economy associated with the creation and sale of emissions offsets from economic sectors outside of the emissions cap.

The potential effects on leakage if economic activity relocates out of the state.

The effectiveness of the combination of measures in meeting identified targets.

The economic implications for near-term periods of short-term and long-term targets specified in the overall policy.

The overall costs and benefits of a cap-and-trade system to the economy of the state.

The impacts on low-income consumers that result from energy price increases.

The consistency of the program with other state and possible federal efforts.

The evaluation of the conditions under which the state should consider linking its trading system to the systems of other states or other countries and how that might be affected by the potential inclusion in the rule of a safety valve.

The timing and changes in the external environment, such as proposals by other states or implementation of a federal program that would spur reevaluation of the Florida program.

The conditions and options for eliminating the Florida program if a federal program were to supplant it.

The need for a regular reevaluation of the progress of other emitting regions of the country and of the world, and whether other regions are abating emissions in a commensurate manner.

The desirability of and possibilities of broadening the scope of the state’s cap-and-trade system at a later date to include more emitting activities as well as sinks in Florida, the conditions that would need to be met to do so, and how the program would encourage these conditions to be met, including developing monitoring and measuring techniques for land use emissions and sinks, regulating sources upstream, and other considerations.